RE: Do you want NO kink in your service relationship?

RE: Do you want NO kink in your service relationship? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

crossboi -> RE: Do you want NO kink in your service relationship? (8/9/2013 8:54:40 PM)
LOL. Dominant ==== Arrogant

DesFIP -> RE: Do you want NO kink in your service relationship? (8/10/2013 2:30:28 PM)
Back when I interacted regularly with a lot of high powered types, head of states, high level execs, it was pretty common for most of them to have wives who could be characterized as dragon lady types. But this was understandable. They didn't want any kink, they just wanted some one else to take care of all the petty bullshit of life. Whether deciding when to redecorate and what style, or what to have for dinner. They didn't offer service, they just didn't want any more responsibility and decision making. It may look from the outside like a femdom relationship but it isn't. Because all the decisions she made had his desires at their core. If he disliked salmon but liked Dover sole, then the cook or caterer was told to make the Dover sole and save the salmon for a ladies luncheon.

Charles6682 -> RE: Do you want NO kink in your service relationship? (8/10/2013 6:09:30 PM)
You do make some good points. I know for myself, I seek a "Female Led Relationship". That can be defined in many ways. For me, kink is not a must. I am comfortable with being a "service sub" because I do seem to get more satisfaction just from being of service more than anything else. There are so many vanilla marriages where its cleat the Wife is running the relationship. But no one calls it D/s. Some people joke, "that's just marriage". Where do you think the term the "Old Ball and Chain" comes from?! Some guys are content on just letting the Lady take the lead. No kink involved at all for many. quote: ORIGINAL: AAkasha With the ever increasing visibility of service relationships in BDSM and also the blending of dominant / submissive "roles" in relationships, as well as the continuing alienation of kinky sex and topping/bottoming and how careful subs (especially males) are about how they present their fetishes, I feel like we have to be careful before assuming anyone even WANTS kink in their bdsm relationships. A lot of people might just be seeking gender-led roles - that simple. I often wonder how many submissive men just want plain and simple female led relationships and will "tolerate" dominance in the form of bdsm play if that's in the mix, and the femdoms out there might be "giving" bdsm play as a way to add elements of structure or nuance maybe but it's not core to their desire, so basically people are "playing" with some kink but it's not what they want most of all in their heart. How many people who read collarchat really want a kinky free (as in play) relationship but with power exchange? I also find it more confusing - I have in laws and friends who - on the outside - have more "FEMDOM" relationships (the woman wears the pants. the man is "pussy whipped and it's so obvious) than in mine. But their husbands are NOT getting tied up. There is NO kinky sex happening (if there is sex at all - it's all missionary!) and yet my relationship is femdom. However, I know a lot of submissive men that are on CM would enjoy these relationships because maybe they don't want kink per se, they want a woman who knows what she wants and demands it and expects it...or do they? Have submissive men just be told - taught - forced to downplay their kinky needs so much because of bad etiquette that they appear as service only now?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.0625