Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Making open relationships work


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Making open relationships work Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Making open relationships work - 8/19/2013 4:33:43 PM   
KnightofMists


Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think even within "open relationships", there are different interpretations. But I wouldn't consider it an open relationship if I cannot get sexually involved with another man, with the full kissing and penetration bit of things.
It's like..., that's just half open. But of course, alot of my bdsm kinks are sexually based. I can't do just bdsm with no sex involved.



Yeah... I am with you there. It is like you can go in the store. Look at all touch it, feel it smell it but don't try it on no matter how much you think it might fit and for god sakes you can't buy it and take it home.

Now that is fine...... If everyone is truly content with that situation.

I consider an Open relationship when i am unrestricted to develeop a relationship with another that is not limited by another relationship. Open to have a relationship which is about sexual, emotional and intellectually connections. But, when I am restricted on those by another relationship I am consider it defined relationship. I get to go and play within the boundaries that are pre-defined by another dynamic.

I have developed relationships with others and they have become rather important and enjoyed by me. Ultimately those relationships reach their defined limits that we work within. At some point though those relationships have seeked to be apart of the larger whole. The larger whole being my family relationship. This involves the individual becoming involved and developing a relationship with each member of the family. This is where it gets tricky. Because our individual dynamic is seeking to merge with another dynamic I have going on. I have done this twice now. The first was when kyra came into my life and the dynamics I had with Alandra and Kyra merged. I had an open relationship with each. I was unrestricted to develop those individual dynamics and neither defined the other. The defined themselves. Recently and my second merging was My dynamic with Danielle that merged into the family. To be fair, I think my relationship with Danielle was dependent on her being able to merge with us three. Not from my perspective but Danielle's. So in an indirect way the family dynamic had defined the individual dynamic between Danielle and I. It wasn't so much imposed on us as it was Danieelle's need and want to have a level of intimacy with all of us or none of us. The irony is that I didn't realize or know this until she had become a part of the family.

I learned something very valuable with what transpired with Danielle. In that I realized more than ever the huge distinction of my individual relationship and that of the family dynamic. I learned that, even though I am free to have an full open relationship with another. I see those individual relationships as secondary to my family dynamic. Because of who I am with my needs and wants, I predefined my dynamics to be secondary to me compared to my family dynamic.

So even though I can have an open relationship from the perspective of all my other relationships not defining any relationship I choose to have. I myself pre-define it. It makes me wonder if there really is such a thing as the open relationship. Maybe open in the sense one relationship will not define the excise or structure of another. But I as an individual do come into a relationship with expectations, hopes and boundaries etc that pre-define it. This just brings me to the part I bolded. If the OP clearly internalized the pre-defined boundaries to have another dynamic... Then isn't that an open relationship?

As I said, if you allow another dynamic to pre-define another relationship. I don't see it that has having an open relationship. But if we as individual enter another relationship with our own pre-defined expectations that is just normal. It doesn't matter, if we enter a relationship with the expectation I will not kiss them etc or if I can only enter a relationship with someone I am sexually attracted to etc etc .

I found one is much more successful if they pre-define their relationships rather than their relationships doing it for them.

_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Making open relationships work - 8/19/2013 7:57:36 PM   
MistressDarkArt


Posts: 5178
Status: offline
^^^ Yikes, my head is spinning trying to keep up with KOM's post above.

(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Making open relationships work - 8/19/2013 8:37:13 PM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think even within "open relationships", there are different interpretations. But I wouldn't consider it an open relationship if I cannot get sexually involved with another man, with the full kissing and penetration bit of things.
It's like..., that's just half open. But of course, alot of my bdsm kinks are sexually based. I can't do just bdsm with no sex involved.




I know it's hard for people to comprehend. I think for some reason, the fact that I was doing a ton of BDSM and sensual S&M long before I was even having sex might be part of the reason. I was tying guys (and getting "sensually aroused") up long before I had my first orgasm. Before I saw or touched a man's penis. Before I touched my own pussy.

And then even after having orgasms, I was still doing more extensive S&M with pain and humiliation before I lost my virginity.

To further complicate matters, I get an entirely different "rush" from S&M than I do from sex. Sure, they are exciting together. I get wet when I so S&M. But I get a high or rush from S&M that I don't get from sex and vice versa. And when I get really aroused from bondage, the arousal I get from it does not make me horny for sex, it makes me horny for more S&M. When I am getting aroused from foreplay during intimacy, I get horny for an orgasm. Oddly enough however, when I get aroused during intimacy for sex, I do get horny for rough sex, S&M and bondage, even if it's in my head, but I can have enjoyable vanilla sex, and I can orgasm, even if I'm not dominating.

I can get great pleasure, also, watching a man submit, even if I am not the top. I can watch a man being dominated by another man, or another woman, or to no one. I just get off on bondage, helplessness, fear and surrender. Sure, to me is better, but I'm pretty kink agnostic when it comes to getting my "fix." He can have all his clothes on if he's wearing a great gag and the bindings are tight across his chest. I don't need to see his dick; I'm not a sexually focused creature, because I think my "femdom wiring" happened in my brain before I was a sexual creature, somehow.

The later "hard-wiring," yes, did happen right alongside my sexual wiring and it integrated quite nicely. But I can do a ton of S&M and bondage without sex and be fine. I would love to sit and cast young hot men for the latest low budget horror flick of frat boys being kidnapped by a serial killer, for example. Sit and watch extremely handsome men show that they can be tied down and method act fear? NEXT!

Akasha

< Message edited by AAkasha -- 8/19/2013 8:39:20 PM >


_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Making open relationships work - 8/19/2013 8:52:23 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

What Aakasha has described sounds like extra-marital trysts, not secondary relationships. Her emotional investment seems fully vested in her marriage, and that seems to leave little for another relationship. It seems to work b/c Aakasha has kind of described herself as a predatory vampire (not in the evil sense) and strong ties and emotional bonds are not what she seeks or wants from her victims.

It kind of reminds me of a single woman who wears a wedding ring while seeking male company -- she's not looking for something LT.

(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Making open relationships work - 8/20/2013 7:35:26 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
So the thing is, it is clear that you just want to play the kink, it's not emotional for you.
For some strange reason, your sub cum husband just seem to feel jealous if you are giving other males bdsm attention.

Tough one. But you knew this is him from the beginning, so..., it is a tough one, he may never feel secure enough for you to do what you wish.

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Making open relationships work - 8/20/2013 5:51:19 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline
Wow, Akasha, thanks for sharing like this. It is fascinating the various ways people put together relationships and what they do and how they see it. I am in a mongamous relationship and I am not sure if our relationship will ever go further, in some ways after so long together our relationship sexually is just starting to evolve...

One thing I have found interesting is hoe people view the same thing differently. Thought BD/SM play is obviously sexual for many/most people, some people treat it as being outside sex, so they don't have a problem with their partner playing with others, kind of like Akasha and her H, others would treat it as a breach the same as having sex. I guess so much of it depends on what people consider to be intimacy, some people are okay with themselves and their spouses having sex with others, others may limit it to play, others to nothing at all.

With men whose wives see other partners, it is interesting, the one thing that is pretty common IME (and that is all it is, and it is limited to maybe 7 or 8 guys) is the fear of intimacy with the other partners by their wives, the sex doesn't really bother them, it is the fear of intimacy with the other partners, of them getting emotionally involved (and there probably is some truth with this, from everything I have read of studies of wives who cheat, what often happens is it isn't just sex, it becomes intimate, and one stat I have heard quoted is that in 65% of cases where wives are caught cheating, the wife files for divorce and supposedly a common reason is they fell for the other man and want to be with him (or her, in some case).....(on the other hand, that may not be surprising, I also seem to recall that in the case of cheating, a lot of women do so for emotional intimacy that is lacking, rather than sex alone,in their relationship)....So kissing, which many men see as an intimate act, is out, as is dating (ie going to dinner/movie), going for walks, etc....I would hazard a guess most men feel they could have sex just for sex sake, but don't see that in women, they believe, whether it is fully true or not, that women cannot have a sexual only relationship, and it scares them.

I can only speak for myself, but I really admire when people can negotiate like this, make compromises and respect each other, trust each other enough to try and work out to get their needs met. Knowing how hard sometimes it is even to talk about fantasies, to talk about things we want to try, etc, it amazes me people have this level of communication and truth:)

I think the only disturbing thing about folks who have open/poly relationships is how others judge them, like the poster on here calling it cheating, or those who go off about the sacred marriage vows, promises, etc....they can't quite see something, that the marriage vows/contract is between the people and there is no cheating or sin unless one or the other of them is hurting the other, cheating, lying, etc. I know of one married couple where it is more cuckold I guess, where he wants the wife to get intimate, she dates the guys, spends weekends with them, travels with them, and she plays along with it, sometimes part of the routine is she comes home not only not wearing her wedding rings, but wearing an 'engagement ring' and tells him the other guy proposed......it is play acting, I guess he gets off on the humiliation, but they also very much love each other and when other partners have gone over the line she has totally ripped them apart, and she would stop if he truly didn't want her to do it, but they both seem to love it....bizarre to me, but they negotiated this, they love each other, and who am I to judge?

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 26
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Making open relationships work Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.047