RE: Now tell me again.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 2:05:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

original: Nosathro

you me . Also the only reason militias were in the South was to keep the black slaves in line. So racism was the reason for the second amendment. You may also consider more recent reports.


Those wern't militias, they were the KKK. Furthermore racism was the reason gun control started in the south. They made it unlawful for newly freed slaves to arm themselves.

Edited to add.......duhhh!!!!


The KKK was after the Civil War.


Ok, so you posted links to UK crime stats and made the above statement. What does one have to do with the other ? Where did the above statement on militias and slaves come from ? And the Second Amendment was for racism ? That's news to me.

Don't feel bad it would have been news to the people who wrote it.




Nosathro -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 2:28:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


The drug dealer/thief


In my career in criminal justice I have not known a drug dealer/thief. Drug dealing is a full time job and I never met a drug dealer interested in stolen goods, cash is to their liking. I will say that I have encountered drug addicts who broke into homes in search of money to buy drugs, but no dealers.

What you don't know will fill an encyclopedia.


And what you think you know would fill the Library of Congress.




Nosathro -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 2:34:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

original: Nosathro

you me . Also the only reason militias were in the South was to keep the black slaves in line. So racism was the reason for the second amendment. You may also consider more recent reports.


Those wern't militias, they were the KKK. Furthermore racism was the reason gun control started in the south. They made it unlawful for newly freed slaves to arm themselves.

Edited to add.......duhhh!!!!


The KKK was after the Civil War.


Ok, so you posted links to UK crime stats and made the above statement. What does one have to do with the other ? Where did the above statement on militias and slaves come from ? And the Second Amendment was for racism ? That's news to me.


Ignorance is bliss




BamaD -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 2:45:51 PM)

You must be a truly happy man.




BamaD -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 2:54:54 PM)

Also the only reason militias were in the South was to keep the black slaves in line. So racism was the reason for the second amendment. You may also consider more recent reports.


To the extent that this is true it is like saying that Dillinger preferred model A so the model A was created to help bank robbers.




lovmuffin -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 3:00:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You must be a truly happy man.


That should have been my line.




BamaD -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 3:13:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You must be a truly happy man.


That should have been my line.

Sorry, didn't mean to step on your line.




deathtothepixies -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 4:16:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I carry to keep my stuff


what stuff do you have that is worth killing for?

My stuff is insured, seems an easier way of doing things




thishereboi -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 4:30:11 PM)

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


The drug dealer/thief


In my career in criminal justice I have not known a drug dealer/thief. Drug dealing is a full time job and I never met a drug dealer interested in stolen goods, cash is to their liking. I will say that I have encountered drug addicts who broke into homes in search of money to buy drugs, but no dealers.

What you don't know will fill an encyclopedia.


And what you think you know would fill the Library of Congress.


I knew one. When sales got slow he stole things to supplement his income. Just because you personally don't know about something, doesn't mean it isn't out there.




Politesub53 -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 5:05:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Nor did I advance such a claim. What I advanced is that gun control laws do not reduce gun violence. What you view as 'ancient' statistice I specifically chose as a benchmark.

Gun control nuts make the argument that britain has gun control laws and very low gun deaths. therefore gun control works.

This is shown to be false as gun deaths rose after the pistol act of 1903 and after the tighter restrictions later. Gun deaths are higher now than before gun control laws were passed - and there is now a 100 year history showing gun control laws did not do what gun control advocates say they did.

Second - I am conversant with your study you quoted. The fact that they were doctors is of no bearing in the study. Their expertise as doctors doesn't come into play. You might as well query them on lunar phases of the moon, brazilian soccer, or man in the mooon marigolds.

Thats study was utter tripe


Do you have any figures to back the bolded claim up with ? Especially for after 1903. And I do mean offical UK figures.

Just looking at stats from the last 20 years proves you are wrong. the high figure of 1996 was due to the Dunblane massacre, the hand gun ban was after that. I am unsure why people make stuff up which is so easily disproved.

http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/compareyears/region/192/rate_of_gun_homicide

Below is a stat re long term murder rates by any means in the UK, down decade after decade until rising again from the 1970s until mid 1990s

RESEARCH PAPER 99/111
14
VI. Crime: Indictable offences, homicides and Police numbers.
Homicides per million population in England and Wales
Year Homicides
1900 9.6
1910 8.1
1920 8.3
1930 7.5
1940 ..
1950 7.9
1955 6.3
1960 6.2
1965 6.8
1970 8.1
1975 10.3
1980 12.5
1985 12.5
1990 13.1
1995 14.5
1997 14.1

Source for the above list is section VI http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-111.pdf




Hillwilliam -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 6:14:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


Also the only reason militias were in the South was to keep the black slaves in line. So racism was the reason for the second amendment.

Every time I think you cannot post something more ignorant then your previous efforts, you prove me wrong.


Then again you should not worry about Zombies either, they eat brains so your safe.

http://truth-out.org/news/item/13890-the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery

The person who was referred to in that article was well named., "Dr. Carl T. Bogus"

Was he a classmate of yours when you were getting your "multiple advanced degrees" that you claim. [:D]




thompsonx -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 6:44:32 PM)

quote:

I knew one. When sales got slow he stole things to supplement his income. Just because you personally don't know about something, doesn't mean it isn't out there.


Well of course you do.[8|]




thompsonx -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 6:48:59 PM)

quote:

the Second Amendment was for racism ? That's news to me.


http://truth-out.org/news/item/13890-the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery




BamaD -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 7:19:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I carry to keep my stuff


what stuff do you have that is worth killing for?

My stuff is insured, seems an easier way of doing things

Glad to hear that since anyone has the right to just come in and take your stuff what do you have that I can use.

I carry to keep my stuff and protect my family.

This is what I said, not the part you took out of context.
What guarantee do you give that my family is safe when they get my stuff.

And I won't kill them over the stuff per se but because they are willing to harm me to get it.




BamaD -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 7:21:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Nor did I advance such a claim. What I advanced is that gun control laws do not reduce gun violence. What you view as 'ancient' statistice I specifically chose as a benchmark.

Gun control nuts make the argument that britain has gun control laws and very low gun deaths. therefore gun control works.

This is shown to be false as gun deaths rose after the pistol act of 1903 and after the tighter restrictions later. Gun deaths are higher now than before gun control laws were passed - and there is now a 100 year history showing gun control laws did not do what gun control advocates say they did.

Second - I am conversant with your study you quoted. The fact that they were doctors is of no bearing in the study. Their expertise as doctors doesn't come into play. You might as well query them on lunar phases of the moon, brazilian soccer, or man in the mooon marigolds.

Thats study was utter tripe


Do you have any figures to back the bolded claim up with ? Especially for after 1903. And I do mean offical UK figures.

Just looking at stats from the last 20 years proves you are wrong. the high figure of 1996 was due to the Dunblane massacre, the hand gun ban was after that. I am unsure why people make stuff up which is so easily disproved.

http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/compareyears/region/192/rate_of_gun_homicide

Below is a stat re long term murder rates by any means in the UK, down decade after decade until rising again from the 1970s until mid 1990s

RESEARCH PAPER 99/111
14
VI. Crime: Indictable offences, homicides and Police numbers.
Homicides per million population in England and Wales
Year Homicides
1900 9.6
1910 8.1
1920 8.3
1930 7.5
1940 ..
1950 7.9
1955 6.3
1960 6.2
1965 6.8
1970 8.1
1975 10.3
1980 12.5
1985 12.5
1990 13.1
1995 14.5
1997 14.1

Source for the above list is section VI http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-111.pdf

Earlier you said that the law was passed in 1923 if my feeble colonial memory serves 1903 is before WWI




Nosathro -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 11:32:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


Also the only reason militias were in the South was to keep the black slaves in line. So racism was the reason for the second amendment.

Every time I think you cannot post something more ignorant then your previous efforts, you prove me wrong.


Then again you should not worry about Zombies either, they eat brains so your safe.

http://truth-out.org/news/item/13890-the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery

The person who was referred to in that article was well named., "Dr. Carl T. Bogus"

Was he a classmate of yours when you were getting your "multiple advanced degrees" that you claim. [:D]


Along with everything else you can't read, Thom Hartmann, well established Commentator and Author.




popeye1250 -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/23/2013 11:56:22 PM)

Now here's a good article about the mentally ill and guns and crimes.
It's written by the Lovely Miss Ann Coulter so if you're a lefty don't read it or you'll get a headache as it makes too much common sense. (Kriptonite!)
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ann-coulter/2013/09/19/coulter-column-crazier-liberals




Politesub53 -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/24/2013 3:37:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Earlier you said that the law was passed in 1923 if my feeble colonial memory serves 1903 is before WWI


If you wish to use shit like feeble colonial memory feel free, but they are your words and not mine.

Your attempt at baiting would have been better served if you had read the fucking thread properly. I clearly quoted both dates.

quote:

My post #87 and the relevant paragraph.

You are spouting even more bollocks re gun ownership in the UK as a whole prior to the 1923 Firearms act (Note the date) Up until then ANYONE could own a weapon. The 1903 Pistol act was introduced to stop pistols getting into the hands of criminals and drunkards, you could still obtain one with a license and that continued to be the case right up until the Dunblane Massacre which took place in a school. Stricter firearms controls took place in 1923 exactly for the reasons stated, the country was awash with guns.

Like I said, you are indeed entitled to your own incorrect opinion but not your own facts.







thompsonx -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/24/2013 6:33:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I carry to keep my stuff


what stuff do you have that is worth killing for?

My stuff is insured, seems an easier way of doing things

Glad to hear that since anyone has the right to just come in and take your stuff what do you have that I can use.


Curious jump of logic here. Where does one acquire the "right"to steal other peoples shit?







thompsonx -> RE: Now tell me again.... (9/24/2013 6:36:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Also the only reason militias were in the South was to keep the black slaves in line. So racism was the reason for the second amendment. You may also consider more recent reports.


To the extent that this is true it is like saying that Dillinger preferred model A so the model A was created to help bank robbers.


http://truth-out.org/news/item/13890-the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875