quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

That's real funny you guys. I might have been upset if you had come up with an intelligent and logical argument against the Tea Party instead of just making up all that stupid or filthy shit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
That's real funny you guys. I might have been upset if you had come up with an intelligent and logical argument against the Tea Party instead of just making up all that stupid or filthy shit.

To be fair, the Tea Party originally called themselves "tea baggers" because they were using tea bags for the symbolism. They did not know the sexual connotation of "tea bagging," though, and quickly distanced themselves from the moniker once they found out.

One of these posters has a picture that shows an older lady with a sign that says something to the effect of "tea bagging for Jesus." It's truly hilarious.

Unfortunately for those whose beliefs sometimes do align with the Tea Party, they did start calling themselves tea baggers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
I get it and I didn't know the sexual connotation either until now. I only recently learned what a nut-(something I can't say because it's in violation of TOS-er) is and it sounds like nut sacker except there's a different vowel in place of the "a", and I think pretty much means the same thing, but still, using nut sacker or that other similar TOS violation of a term is taking teabagger out of its context and equivalent to a typical 4th grade school yard insult like poopy face. I guess that's the best they can do.
When I think about it though, I wish I could have been there when that lady with the sign found out the other meaning for tea bagger.
That is funny.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Yeah it aint a matter of dont agree with them. First they are fucking inept, secondly they are ignorant, thirdly they know nothing of the constitution, fourthly they must lie in every case to further their agenda. There is more, but even the Nazi party had more connection to thought and truth than the nutsackers.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
You haven't one which is not an unusual state of affairs, you have ignorant jingos. What are the truths that they promulgate? What is there to agree with that they actually walk the walk that they spew horseshit about?
Dont say smaller government, nutsackers have added thousands to the payroll.
Dont say fiscally responsible, nutsackers are presiding over historic debt of their making, historic levels of borrow and spend of their making.
Dont say constitutionality, they have no observable understanding of constitution and law.
Dont say cooperation, compromise, cordiality, communication, or consideration, they are inept, vituperative, lying, obstructionists and can only make their shitreathing ideology (which is inchoate and hallucinatory) by fantastical and farcical made up smears and impugnation, and ignoring majorities, and craven capitualism in subservience to corporate masters.
Thanks for making my point.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
You haven't one which is not an unusual state of affairs, you have ignorant jingos. What are the truths that they promulgate? What is there to agree with that they actually walk the walk that they spew horseshit about?
Dont say smaller government, nutsackers have added thousands to the payroll.
Dont say fiscally responsible, nutsackers are presiding over historic debt of their making, historic levels of borrow and spend of their making.
Dont say constitutionality, they have no observable understanding of constitution and law.
Dont say cooperation, compromise, cordiality, communication, or consideration, they are inept, vituperative, lying, obstructionists and can only make their shitreathing ideology (which is inchoate and hallucinatory) by fantastical and farcical made up smears and impugnation, and ignoring majorities, and craven capitualism in subservience to corporate masters.
Thanks for making my point.

You already made my point, MN. No need to continue on.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
You haven't one which is not an unusual state of affairs, you have ignorant jingos. What are the truths that they promulgate? What is there to agree with that they actually walk the walk that they spew horseshit about?
Dont say smaller government, nutsackers have added thousands to the payroll.
Dont say fiscally responsible, nutsackers are presiding over historic debt of their making, historic levels of borrow and spend of their making.
Dont say constitutionality, they have no observable understanding of constitution and law.
Dont say cooperation, compromise, cordiality, communication, or consideration, they are inept, vituperative, lying, obstructionists and can only make their shitreathing ideology (which is inchoate and hallucinatory) by fantastical and farcical made up smears and impugnation, and ignoring majorities, and craven capitualism in subservience to corporate masters.
Thanks for making my point.

You already made my point, MN. No need to continue on.

Now I get it, nutsackers are the borrow and spend liberals.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
I don't use it either though I sick of seeing it. I can certainly define, in more ways than one, how I perceive it.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Yep, and your logic is excellent, the same as your signature lines.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The same Kaiser that you claimed was a liberal organization?

So let me get this straight. You are more concerned about the 500K who may lose their private, grandfathered insurance policies ....

Perspective, thats 1.3% of California's total population - But lets cut out the almost 3 million in that state that are illegal - Now we are at 1.4%

...... instead of the 22% who have no insurance at all?

quote:

No tizzy. I'm concerned that OBAMACARE is adding to the ranks of the uninsured.
And its pretty much a given that there will be MORE uninsured 1 year from now than there is now.

quote:

Families are going to be spending 50% more on healthcare - meaning they won't be spending it on other things.
Huge explosion in the numbers of patients going to medicare doctors - but... there aren't any more medicare profiders than last year. What do you think that will do to wait times.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yeah it aint a matter of dont agree with them. First they are fucking inept, secondly they are ignorant, thirdly they know nothing of the constitution, fourthly they must lie in every case to further their agenda. There is more, but even the Nazi party had more connection to thought and truth than the nutsackers.