Zonie63
Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011 From: The Old Pueblo Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML quote:
I don't know if there's any duration to cause and effect. I would just go through it on a matter-of-fact basis. Other than that, I'm not sure what you're getting at. Interpretations of history. For example, some claim there is a connection from the 1919 Treaty at Versailles to hyper inflation in Berlin to the fall of Weimer to the rise of Hitler. A different interpretation would be that Hitler came to power because he threw a lot of money at the German recession which was just an offshoot of the failure of capitalism and market speculation. Both interpretations would have some truth to them, although I would say the difference is one of emphasis, not any obvious contradiction with the available facts. quote:
As painful as Kennedy's assignation was at the time it may have little relevance to our present national condition. So, maybe not so memorable??? Maybe not. As I mentioned above, few people seem to care or remember much about Garfield's or McKinley's assassinations, so there's a question of why JFK and Oswald are so famous. Perhaps because it's still in the active memories of people alive today (although that number is getting smaller, as you pointed out). Maybe in a hundred years, historians will be able to put these events into better perspective. I somewhat disagree with the view that it may have little relevance to our present national condition. In terms of the grand scale of history, 50 years is just a drop in the bucket. It wasn't that long ago, and I don't really see any obvious disconnect between the events of today and the events of 50 years ago. The decade in which it happened is viewed as a pivotal decade, the barrier between the "old paradigm" and the "new paradigm," something which still influences how we see things nowadays.
|