eulero83
Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady But isn't that all the more reason they should be using condoms? They should, but before you can find somebody there also should be a law. I'm all in favour for a law using condoms in porn (the monkey see, monkey do mentality that was mentioned), but unless it is a legal obligation, it's a bit hard to enforce and I think without a law a bit of a lost case. The porn industry produces for their clients, who possibly prefer to see porn without condoms, so they want to produce what sells, the only way to get them to change is by passing a law. I googled "california safety work law" and found section 3383 of the california health and safety on workplace regulation says: quote:
(a) Body protection may be required for employees whose work exposes parts of their body, not otherwise protected as required by other orders in this article, to hazardous or flying substances or objects. (b) Clothing appropriate for the work being done shall be worn. Loose sleeves, tails, ties, lapels, cuffs, or other loose clothing which can be entangled in moving machinery shall not be worn. (c) Clothing saturated or impregnated with flammable liquids, corrosive substances, irritants or oxidizing agents shall be removed and shall not be worn until properly cleaned. It doesn't specificate what's the nature of the hazard, just that if there is any protective clothing shall be worn. To me it seems there is a law.
|