DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata All across America you will see roadside memorials placed by family and friends where a loved one died. Given that the majority of the U.S. population is Christian, they are usually crosses - but not always, of course. One of them was along a roadside in Lake Elsinore, CA. But that one is gone now, because the dead boy's mother was threatened with a lawsuit by The American Humanist Association. In May 2012, 19-year-old Anthony Vincent Devaney was struck and killed crossing Lake Street. In December of that year, the family erected the memorial. A complaint prompted the American Humanist Association in Washington, D.C., to intervene, contending the placement of the symbol in the city right-of-way violated the separation of church and state... Representatives of the association said they were prepared to challenge the city again if it didn’t ensure the Devaneys’ cross came down. The organization, which represents atheists and other nonreligious individuals, released a statement Thursday expressing gratitude the cross was being removed. ~Source In my opinion, it is beyond ridiculous to claim that these sorrowful memorials constitute a governmental establishment of religion. And while we are once again left to wonder what goal these groups are trying to achieve, it's seems at least clear that upholding the Constitution isn't one of them. K. When these memorials are maintained by the city, as this one was, it does become an endorsement of religion when the sole symbol is a large cross on the city right of way. This city had also just tried to erect a large cross as a "war memorial." I agree the cross from 9/11 should go in the museum strictly as a relic of the structure. The religious connotations should not be involved and all the blessings and that crap should not be included in a museum I pay for.
< Message edited by DomKen -- 3/11/2014 8:51:27 AM >
|