quote:

ORIGINAL: smileforme50

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

I just am not able to see the comparison between a guy tasting his own and you going down on another women.

You find the idea gross.
But it has nothing to do with what she might taste like.
The idea is repellent to you.

And if it is a hard limit then it is a hard limit.
After you have stated that once, when a guy brings it up again, then he has proven that the 2 of you are incompatible as partners.
You don't need to justify it.
It simply is a hard limit for you.

You don't see the comparison?? Really?

I'm giving the (straight) guys a bit of a break because I know they would all totally freak out if I suggested the true comparison of them blowing another man....I already KNOW that none of them would admit to doing that. But it irritates me that most of them are so repulsed by the mere mention of them performing a homosexual act. Yet they think that women should be willing to go down on each without any hesitation.

It's doesn't matter that it's a hard limit for me. I'm just asking THEM to not be such hypocrites.

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

They don't know they are being hypocritical.
They only know one thing: that to them, gal on gal is extremely hot.
So trying to approach it with any sort of logic isn't going to work.
Logic can't apply: the blood flow is being diverted to other places.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

They don't know they are being hypocritical.
They only know one thing: that to them, gal on gal is extremely hot.
So trying to approach it with any sort of logic isn't going to work.
Logic can't apply: the blood flow is being diverted to other places.

For whatever it's worth, an LGBT-friendly psychotherapist I know told me that she has observed that straight males who have a gal-on-gal voyeuristic fetish often have suppressed/repressed bisexual tendencies which they have found consciously acceptable to project in this manner.

In other words, it's acceptable to get turned on by seeing two females together performing sexual acts and to be fascinated by this prospect, but not two males. That hits too close to home per homophobia, hence the seeming hypocrisy. In some cases, the voyeuristic male is actually identifying with one of the females. She says it's not uncommon for this type of male to choose a female avatar he can hide behind or to impersonate a female on line.

quote:

ORIGINAL: blacksword404

And what about the men who are not turned on by it? They gay as well? Quacks.

If you don't like dicks, you're gay. If you don't like swallowing cum you're gay. If you like swallowing cum you're gay. If you like seeing two hot naked women have sex and make all sort of noises, you're certainly gay.

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ


They don't know they are being hypocritical.
They only know one thing: that to them, gal on gal is extremely hot.
So trying to approach it with any sort of logic isn't going to work.
Logic can't apply: the blood flow is being diverted to other places.