RE: Lois Lerner (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


subrosaDom -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 5:23:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Ends up Lois Lerner was e-mailing her husband with the conservative knock

Republicans this week released e-mails showing that former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner expressed scorn for conservatives in an e-mail to an unidentified recipient — the name was redacted.

Lerner’s remarks would be troubling if she sent them to another IRS official, but it ends up that she was communicating with her husband, Michael Miles, according to unredacted copies of the exchange that Democrats leaked on Friday.


Former IRS official Lois Lerner (AP/Lauren Victoria Burke)
To review, Lerner used the term “__hole” to describe extreme conservatives after Miles complained about “the whacko wing of the GOP,” adding that “right wing radio shows are scary to listen to.”

This goes back to our point in an earlier article that federal employees are not prohibited from having political views or expressing them in private conversations. They just can’t promote candidates at work or use their positions to influence elections.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/08/01/ends-up-lois-lerner-was-e-mailing-her-husband-with-the-conservative-knock/#


And what would leftists be saying if during the Bush admin, someone in her position had been responsible for huge delays on applications for liberal/left groups and she had said "the whacko wing of the Democrats" and "left wing radio shows are scary to listen to"? Tell me that Dems and lefties wouldn't have said a word and would have said it's fine because it's a private conversation and I have a bridge to sell you.




Lucylastic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 5:38:05 AM)

tit for tat?
LMAO yeah ok, whatever!
the fact that as yet, nothing has come up that place her in the realm of any wrong doing..... legally
but keep trying.




subrosaDom -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 5:51:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

tit for tat?
LMAO yeah ok, whatever!
the fact that as yet, nothing has come up that place her in the realm of any wrong doing..... legally
but keep trying.



When you destroy all the evidence and institute a conspiracy (in the legal sense) to effect that destruction, it makes it harder to find the smoking gun, since the paper has reached 451 Fahrenheit, actually or metaphorically.




Lucylastic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 6:02:04 AM)

assuming facts not yet in evidence....legally
conspiracy is not fact, or legal




Sanity -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 6:27:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

And what would leftists be saying if during the Bush admin, someone in her position had been responsible for huge delays on applications for liberal/left groups and she had said "the whacko wing of the Democrats" and "left wing radio shows are scary to listen to"? Tell me that Dems and lefties wouldn't have said a word and would have said it's fine because it's a private conversation and I have a bridge to sell you.


Without their hypocrisy, leftists would have nothing.




TheHeretic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 9:10:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

This goes back to our point in an earlier article that federal employees are not prohibited from having political views or expressing them in private conversations. They just can’t promote candidates at work or use their positions to influence elections.



And using her position to try and influence elections is precisely what Ms. Lerner is accused of, Lucy. It's not like this email popped up in a vacuum, and is sparking a witch hunt to see if she somehow used her office to advance her beliefs about conservatives. We already know what she had been up to. In context, the email is damning.





DomKen -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 9:15:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

This goes back to our point in an earlier article that federal employees are not prohibited from having political views or expressing them in private conversations. They just can’t promote candidates at work or use their positions to influence elections.



And using her position to try and influence elections is precisely what Ms. Lerner is accused of, Lucy. It's not like this email popped up in a vacuum, and is sparking a witch hunt to see if she somehow used her office to advance her beliefs about conservatives. We already know what she had been up to. In context, the email is damning.


You are aware of the fact that Lerner is a Republican right?




Lucylastic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 9:21:15 AM)

we shall see.
IF its all they have more fair enough... but its not the smoking gun, its naff all.




TheHeretic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 9:30:20 AM)

No. The smoking gun is the lengths the Dems are going to in order to protect her ass, Lucy.

Speaking of asses, if you are going to run with a bubble butt for an avatar, couldn't you at least find one with some welts?




Lucylastic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 9:32:21 AM)

I could, but im not gonna.....




Sanity -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 9:53:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

You are aware of the fact that Lerner is a Republican right?


No more a Republican than you

Did the above emails escape your attention?

Bush may have appointed her, but to his detriment Bush tried to be a bipartisan leader

Practically suicidally so

Mr Nice guy, wanted everyone to like him

Big mistake




TheHeretic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 10:06:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You are aware of the fact that Lerner is a Republican right?



As much a Republican as you are, Ken, though she displays much more personal integrity. [8|]




DomKen -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 10:22:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You are aware of the fact that Lerner is a Republican right?



As much a Republican as you are, Ken, though she displays much more personal integrity. [8|]

Unlike like you I can check someone's resume
1981 Lerner is hired by the FEC (that's under Ronald Reagan)
2001 She returns to the FEC under W
Then she is appointed to the IRS job.

That's a lot of patronage by Republicans for a Democrat.




Sanity -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 10:24:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You are aware of the fact that Lerner is a Republican right?



As much a Republican as you are, Ken, though she displays much more personal integrity. [8|]


I think he really believes that she is a Republican




TheHeretic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 10:25:53 AM)

So you admit you are making shit up. That's a step in the right direction.




TheHeretic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 10:28:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

I think he really believes ...



Ken believes whatever is convenient at any given moment. That doesn't mean it has anything to do with reality. It's like Sheila Jackson Lee talking about how Democrats never tried to impeach Bush II.




DomKen -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 11:55:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

So you admit you are making shit up. That's a step in the right direction.

No, you ignorant hillbilly. I already proved she has spent most of her career in government working for Republicans. Maybe if you'd pull your head out of your ass and try thinking for a change instead of reading Drudge you could figure that out for yourself.




TheHeretic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 12:54:46 PM)

Ken, the ONLY thing you have ever proved on these boards is that you are a partisan whore and that you lie casually and constantly.

Oh. And that you swear like somebody who spent his Naval service as a chaplain's aide on the Great Lakes.

No decent American should be okay with the IRS being used as a partisan tool by any side. You haven't proved that, but you are an exhibit in the case to be made.




Sanity -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 1:05:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

No, you ignorant hillbilly. I already proved she has spent most of her career in government working for Republicans. Maybe if you'd pull your head out of your ass and try thinking for a change instead of reading Drudge you could figure that out for yourself.


So, everyone in government now is a Democrat, working for Democrats?




TheHeretic -> RE: Lois Lerner (8/3/2014 1:38:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

So, everyone in government now is a Democrat, working for Democrats?



That would come as a real surprise to a lot of the government employees I know. [:D]




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875