Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Another poitless gun death.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Another poitless gun death. Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 1:29:11 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD


Lazerath Long "the only crime should be stupidity, the penalty should be death, and should be administered instantly"


Do you think it prudent to follow the advice of a fictional character of whom it's creator has commented on as being a self absorbed asshole without an ounce of compassion in his body whose only function is to perpetuate and agrandise his family empire?
If you are going to read hineline then read all of hineline including his wife.




Over regulation leads to complacency.


Yet when asked you can never tell us just what is overregulated and how so.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 2:40:18 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

And this thread is another cruel attempt to take advantage of a stupid senseless accident to score political points.


But Bama... how many of these tragedies must we have before political points are necessary?

Come on laws are needed damn it... the owner of the range said it was common for them to teach 5 year old kids how to shoot...please don't tell me you are as nuts as him.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 2:53:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

And this thread is another cruel attempt to take advantage of a stupid senseless accident to score political points.


But Bama... how many of these tragedies must we have before political points are necessary?

Come on laws are needed damn it... the owner of the range said it was common for them to teach 5 year old kids how to shoot...please don't tell me you are as nuts as him.

Butch

Have you ever heard of child endangerment laws? That is all that is needed, but they need to be enforced.
My son started shooting at 7.
But not even with a repeater, let alone full auto.
Please, please point out where I said this was anything but stupid.
Young children should be taught gun safety, but there is a right and a wrong way to do it.
Remember this was not a 5 year old, that age has only crept in for shock value.
By 10 a kid should, if they have been taught properly, be safe with a firearm and adult supervision. But they still shouldn't have full auto.
So yes this is an attempt to use this tragedy for political gain to the extent that at least one gunaphob pretended it was the kid who got shot.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 2:54:24 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Cars and poisons and pools, fires, stabbings, beatings, domestic abuse, drugs, rapes, accidents with power tools ,stupid parents, abusive parents, negligent adults, ignorant neighbours and curious children happen everywhere, in every country every day.
Humans are stupid.

There are regulations made covering safety issues when they become problematic or a solution is found to lessen the harm caused.
That a huge number of people dont get why others get upset angry, passionate about the pointless preventable deaths caused by idiots with guns. And especially those who have no desire to see a change in laws, OR enforcement of laws 7in place to lessen the harm done by idiots with guns is selfish, shortsighted and ignorant especially when they pretend (to themselves mostly) they have never done anything stupid/careless or thoughtless in their lives.

And yet...for all those regulations and laws, people die. Children die. In most cases, irresponsible behavior on the part of children masquerading as adults is involved.


Actually, because of those regulations, far fewer die. Most idiots whom would do such a thing, will not be thinking on whether the action will kill them, but on the penalty of doing such a thing. There are laws against murder. Murder laws are a REGULATION. People still get murdered; but how much less are they murder than if there was no law covering murder?

The only person displaying irresponsible behavior in this discussion is YOU. You do not understand what a law or regulation is defined (a regulation is a law, and a law is a regulation).

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Having a swimming pool or a car or drugs is not a right. Having a gun is.


Yes, if you ignore the first half of the 2nd amendment and reinterpret the second half anyway you want; yes, having a firearm is an 'individual right'. Of course, I still haven't found a single conservative or gun nut on here that feels its 'ok' to ignore politically inconvenient concepts of other amendments and reinterpret the remainder of those amendments in a politically advantage way. If its not 'ok' to ignore parts of an amendment nor reinterpret them to fit our narrow political views; then its not 'ok' for conservatives and gun nuts to do the same on the 2nd amendment. For what you do on the 2nd, the government can easily do on the 8th. Would you like the first half of the 8th amendment being ignored and the second half reinterpreted by the government? You forget, that our government is run by US Citizens, whom have just as much to the rights as you do.

And your also wrong thinking you have a right to a gun. When US Citizens get tired of the blatant deaths due to firearms, things will be changed. The more of an asshole and dick you show your fellow Americans, the FASTER, that will happen. So you have nothing to gain by behaving in that form. You might consider improving your behavior.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Because it is, some folks get upset when others argue as if it is the gun's fault rather than the person(s) handling it. And part of that is because those who argue most vociferously against guns do not come to these boards ranting when a child is killed by some parent stoked on drugs. They don't come ranting on the boards when some child drowns in a bathtub, left unattended by a young mother on her cell phone. They don't come ranting on the boards when some poor old gentleman is knocked unconscious ...and later dies... by some young thug playing the knock-out game. And yet...let a tragedy occur where a gun is involved and suddenly you have those like tweakabelle saying that no 2nd Amendment right is worth a drop of "precious child" blood. I don't like to assume because that's usually where I am proved wrong but I would be willing to bet that for tweakabelle...And some others...that statement would be extended to mean no drop of precious HUMAN blood.


I'm not saying to ban the 2nd amendment due to this instance. I am saying that unfortunately, we'll have to regulate this issue in the hopes that range owners do not hire total idiots to be instructors. And that firearm instruction with children is handled in a very specific manner. I don't think children should be allowed automatic firearms....EVER.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
The bigger problem comes about when they say "reasonable" regulations and then want to try and wrap up a right in a more restrictive package than anything else just waiting for a tragedy. Do I, as a gun owner, think that handing over an Uzi to a 9 year old is smart? Responsible? No. Nor do most of the gun rights proponents on this thread. So, punish the parents under child abuse statutes or make a law restricting the age of someone that is allowed to use an Uzi. The problem comes about when you want to restrict my access to one. If I have gone through a background check, taken a gun safety course and don't use it illegally, it is my right to have it. I've gone through more vetting to own a gun than I did to own a car which can be just as dangerous. More than I went through to have a child. Some people say that's a right too but I don't see anti-gun people lining up to demand background checks on those folks, despite the fact that there are a helluva lot more children killed through neglect and abuse every year than there are children killed by irresponsible gun owners.


See that BOLD part? That's you demanding a regulation. Someone that's against regulations.

No one on this thread is stating to restrict your usage of firearms. The WHOLE thread is about 'how do you feel about this event, and what could be done to minimize it going forward'.

An there are quite a number of different systems, tools, regulations, and people that deal with child abuse and neglect in the nation. Its a thankless job, but it helps keep children from being abused and killed.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 2:59:09 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
quote:

And this thread is another cruel attempt to take advantage of a stupid senseless accident to score political points.

But Bama... how many of these tragedies must we have before political points are necessary?

Come on laws are needed damn it... the owner of the range said it was common for them to teach 5 year old kids how to shoot...please don't tell me you are as nuts as him.

Butch

Have you ever heard of child endangerment laws? That is all that is needed, but they need to be enforced.
My son started shooting at 7.
But not even with a repeater, let alone full auto.
Please, please point out where I said this was anything but stupid.
Young children should be taught gun safety, but there is a right and a wrong way to do it.
Remember this was not a 5 year old, that age has only crept in for shock value.
By 10 a kid should, if they have been taught properly, be safe with a firearm and adult supervision. But they still shouldn't have full auto.
So yes this is an attempt to use this tragedy for political gain to the extent that at least one gunaphob pretended it was the kid who got shot.


Oh yeah, because you have....NEVER....used a tragedy to advance your political views on firearms....

The kid's age was not added in for shock value, but to explain the facts of the story. That's called 'Journalism'. There is nothing political in stating feeling bad about this little girl; its called 'being human'.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:09:14 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: joether


Yes, if you ignore the first half of the 2nd amendment and reinterpret the second half anyway you want; yes, having a firearm is an 'individual right'.

I think you mean well but you have your facts wrong. If you were to consult the anti federalist papers on this issue you could disabuse yourself of your ignorance and do your cause for gun safety(if that is your quest)more good.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:15:16 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
FR

I'm always a bit baffled about this 'Oh you're scoring political points' charge. Very often a specific problem is seen as part of a more general issue across society. If so, it's bound to be seen, also, as a political problem. Why exactly is it somehow inherently wrong to bring up the politics of it?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:21:20 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
quote:

And this thread is another cruel attempt to take advantage of a stupid senseless accident to score political points.

But Bama... how many of these tragedies must we have before political points are necessary?

Come on laws are needed damn it... the owner of the range said it was common for them to teach 5 year old kids how to shoot...please don't tell me you are as nuts as him.

Butch

Have you ever heard of child endangerment laws? That is all that is needed, but they need to be enforced.
My son started shooting at 7.
But not even with a repeater, let alone full auto.
Please, please point out where I said this was anything but stupid.
Young children should be taught gun safety, but there is a right and a wrong way to do it.
Remember this was not a 5 year old, that age has only crept in for shock value.
By 10 a kid should, if they have been taught properly, be safe with a firearm and adult supervision. But they still shouldn't have full auto.
So yes this is an attempt to use this tragedy for political gain to the extent that at least one gunaphob pretended it was the kid who got shot.


Oh yeah, because you have....NEVER....used a tragedy to advance your political views on firearms....

The kid's age was not added in for shock value, but to explain the facts of the story. That's called 'Journalism'. There is nothing political in stating feeling bad about this little girl; its called 'being human'.



Read, I said that those of your ilk who want to make the most points possible have worked in the age of 5, when they know it isn't true. And some have even pretended it was the kid who was shot.


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:23:43 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

I'm always a bit baffled about this 'Oh you're scoring political points' charge. Very often a specific problem is seen as part of a more general issue across society. If so, it's bound to be seen, also, as a political problem. Why exactly is it somehow inherently wrong to bring up the politics of it?

How can you be baffled by an argument you use. That is the first thing I get when I show how much evil can be done with knives. If you can throw it at me expect it to be shoved down your throat every time you turn around.
At least I am not accusing anyone of gloating because someone died.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 8/28/2014 3:25:02 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:24:12 PM   
AQRMZ


Posts: 147
Joined: 10/12/2013
Status: offline
In reply to almost everybody.

You guys are all missing the point.

When the owner was interviewed on the TV news, he said the guy was doing it wrong, it is not the kid's fault or a law or anything else'
but the guy was not standing where he was supposed to stand and he had his hand on the kid's back instead of the shoulder. The video confirmed that by showing someone doing it right.

Just emphasizes that with a firearm, ya do it right or else!!!

Had he been where he was supposed to be the shot would have gone off into the air and probably hit AirFarceONE or something. Then you would have something real to piss about.

JUST JOKIN' here folks. just jokin'.

< Message edited by AQRMZ -- 8/28/2014 3:26:43 PM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:26:36 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AQRMZ

You guys are all missing the point.

When the owner was interviewed he said the guy was doing it wrong, it is not the kid's fault or a law or anything else but the guy was not standing where he was supposed to stand and he had his hand on the kid's back instead of the shoulder.

Had he been where he was supposed to be the shot would have gone off into the air and probably hit AirFarceONE or something. Then you would have something real to piss about.

JUST JOKIN' here folks. just jokin'.

But you are correct that the owner said the dead guy screwed up.
Like there is a big argument about that.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to AQRMZ)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:28:30 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
How can you be baffled by an argument you use. That is the first thing I get when I show how much evil can be done with knives. If you can throw it at me expect it to be shoved down your throat every time you turn around.
At least I am not accusing anyone of gloating because someone died.


Sorry, what the feck are you talking about, Bama? How does that relate to me or what I've said?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:36:19 PM   
AQRMZ


Posts: 147
Joined: 10/12/2013
Status: offline
Yes, but every body is going off on the law.

Heck I taught my oldest how to shoot the Colt .45 when he was about 6. First time, I sat him down under the range bench (week day, Alameda gun club range was empty except for my neighbor and me.) Action was open, mag. was out and I told him to look at the target 25yd. I turned around to get stuff out of the truck and all of a sudden he was standing behind me with the gun. ................ Well, I gently took it out of his hand, informed him quietly that we had to go home now because he did not mind me and did something unsafe. My neighbor looked at me like what the heck? And I whispered to him that it was a great learning opportunity for the boy. Needless to say something like than never happened again.

Also on gun training for kids: around that time the Army was talking about training a "point and shoot" kind of drill. I had a .22 air rifle and Dave, the boy, knew how to shoot it so I took him in the back yard where there was lemon tree, the decorative kind, in three shots he could hit a lemon on the ground from 30' every time by just holding it to his shoulder and focusing on the lemon and the point of impact.

So kids can be trained if a adult is patient and willing.

BTW, he has never had a gun accident in his life.



< Message edited by AQRMZ -- 8/28/2014 3:37:30 PM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 3:42:23 PM   
eulero83


Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

And this thread is another cruel attempt to take advantage of a stupid senseless accident to score political points.


But Bama... how many of these tragedies must we have before political points are necessary?

Come on laws are needed damn it... the owner of the range said it was common for them to teach 5 year old kids how to shoot...please don't tell me you are as nuts as him.

Butch

Have you ever heard of child endangerment laws? That is all that is needed, but they need to be enforced.
My son started shooting at 7.
But not even with a repeater, let alone full auto.
Please, please point out where I said this was anything but stupid.
Young children should be taught gun safety, but there is a right and a wrong way to do it.
Remember this was not a 5 year old, that age has only crept in for shock value.
By 10 a kid should, if they have been taught properly, be safe with a firearm and adult supervision. But they still shouldn't have full auto.
So yes this is an attempt to use this tragedy for political gain to the extent that at least one gunaphob pretended it was the kid who got shot.


Why do I have a suspect you just consider right everything you do and wrong everything you don't do?

I'll just say that childern are not adults in smaller size, and considering them as such in endangering.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: Another pointless gun death. - 8/28/2014 4:06:22 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

You should worry more about how you look.

K.




I wondered when some arsehole would post this, instead of staying on topic.


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: Another pointless gun death. - 8/28/2014 4:08:01 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Let me see now, how is it this goes?

quote:

is it the inefficence of the weapon that pisses you off or are you just mocking the death of a persons to make a political point?



Yeah, that was it.

No Viagra needed for Polite this evening I see.

I haven't read the thread (and doubt there would be any point in doing so), but let me 'splain something. In the US, we have kids who race cars and motorcycles, jump out of airplanes, train attack dogs, climb mountains, scuba dive, and engage in any other inherently risky sport you can think of. This is a tragic accident, but it doesn't call for jack shit, or call jack shit into question.

I think that covers it.


Yeah Rich, you got it covered in your usual trollish manner. Dont worry about what actually taken place eh.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: Another pointless gun death. - 8/28/2014 4:14:55 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

And just a note to our British friends who have gotten themselves all into a tizzy about something involving the guidance provided to an American child, do be aware that some of your news flows our way as well.

The Rotherham subject is going to be taboo on this forum, but what the FUCK is wrong with you miserable shits!?!?! Maybe have a look in your own fucking yard, instead of peering into ours? 1400 victims over a period of years and your goddamn USELESS FUCKING unarmed police just assumed they were exaggerating and making up stories, and were afraid they might be called racists if they did anything?

HOW FUCKING DARE YOU make snide little comments about us when this is happening under your noses?


Wow, fake outrage. Do you think the overwhelming majority in the UK, of all races, are not outraged by this. Or the fact that South Yorkshire Police have a history of covering up bad stories. As does the government in certain instances, with those bastards claiming "Not in the public interest"

I am unsure why the notion that child abuse and the subsequent follow up would be taboo. I am quite happy to start a thread myself if the moderators allow it.

You do know the whole story behind Rotherham, and the recent report, right ? No, I didnt think so.



(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: Another poitless gun death. - 8/28/2014 4:16:41 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

And this thread is another cruel attempt to take advantage of a stupid senseless accident to score political points.


But Bama... how many of these tragedies must we have before political points are necessary?

Come on laws are needed damn it... the owner of the range said it was common for them to teach 5 year old kids how to shoot...please don't tell me you are as nuts as him.

Butch

Have you ever heard of child endangerment laws? That is all that is needed, but they need to be enforced.
My son started shooting at 7.
But not even with a repeater, let alone full auto.
Please, please point out where I said this was anything but stupid.
Young children should be taught gun safety, but there is a right and a wrong way to do it.
Remember this was not a 5 year old, that age has only crept in for shock value.
By 10 a kid should, if they have been taught properly, be safe with a firearm and adult supervision. But they still shouldn't have full auto.
So yes this is an attempt to use this tragedy for political gain to the extent that at least one gunaphob pretended it was the kid who got shot.


Why do I have a suspect you just consider right everything you do and wrong everything you don't do?

I'll just say that childern are not adults in smaller size, and considering them as such in endangering.


Because you are an idiot.
As demonstrated by the fact that you think I said that children are just short adults.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 8/28/2014 4:22:30 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to eulero83)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: Another pointless gun death. - 8/28/2014 4:17:21 PM   
AQRMZ


Posts: 147
Joined: 10/12/2013
Status: offline
>>>>E83 Why do I have a suspect you just consider right everything you do and wrong everything you don't do? <<<<

Simple, Because we know what is right/works and what is wrong/fucksup and we make the informed adult choice to avoid fucking up.

It is hell to get called on the carpet by folks like you.


SO IT IS SIMPLE, JUST DON'T FUCK UP. IT USUALLY AIN'T ROCKET SCIENCE, NOW DUH?

< Message edited by AQRMZ -- 8/28/2014 4:19:58 PM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: Another pointless gun death. - 8/28/2014 4:18:25 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

And just a note to our British friends who have gotten themselves all into a tizzy about something involving the guidance provided to an American child, do be aware that some of your news flows our way as well.

The Rotherham subject is going to be taboo on this forum, but what the FUCK is wrong with you miserable shits!?!?! Maybe have a look in your own fucking yard, instead of peering into ours? 1400 victims over a period of years and your goddamn USELESS FUCKING unarmed police just assumed they were exaggerating and making up stories, and were afraid they might be called racists if they did anything?

HOW FUCKING DARE YOU make snide little comments about us when this is happening under your noses?


This needs to be rammed down the throat of anyone who has ever used the "racist" slur to attack an idea they just didn't like. Rammed down hard enough that it will hurt to swallow for days afterward.



Fuck you, racism is racism, there is never any justification for it, just like there was no justification for a cover up. Those who did so committed a crime "Misconduct in a public office" and should be investigated by an independent source. if needed, then should then have their day in court.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Another poitless gun death. Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141