quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Gauge

I am no expert on the demolition of buildings,

Then why do you offer your ignorant opinion?


but I know there is a lot more involved than simply placing charges.

How would you know this if,as you say, you are no expert on the demolition of buildings?

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

To comment is one thing but when you offer self admitted ignorance re:demolition or engineering then expect to be called on it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

To comment is one thing but when you offer self admitted ignorance re:demolition or engineering then expect to be called on it.

What I know about demolition of a building is fundamental at best, but I can read and I can search on the Internet and have discovered, from expert sites that there is, in fact, more to demolition than simply placing charges. If you are intent on badgering me for something innocuous and trite, don't bother.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

FR
sorry for being awol here, just popped on for a quick peek and expect to have more time later to address some of the issues brought up.

Meantime here is some food for thought.

Here are a couple more (compared) that were shown to people over and over again on tv to sell the attacks on the ME, suffice to say both cannot be correct and the only way this anomaly is possible is through the use of CGI.

Then there is a difference in preparing a building and loading it. People were given the impression that its a necessity to torch them first but its not. Most preparation is removing all the contaminates which takes months. Loading it only takes a matter of minutes but no need to believe me here is a 30 year demo veteran tells how its done with regard to building WTC7 the one no plane hit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well before we talk about my knowledge of demolition, (no time right now to get into it) what do you think about this stack of phds has to say about it?

Meet the Experts | 9/11: Explosive Evidence

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well before we talk about my knowledge of demolition, (no time right now to get into it) what do you think about this stack of phds has to say about it?

Meet the Experts | 9/11: Explosive Evidence

Experts like Richard Gage, who admits himself he knows fuck all about demolitions ? You need to do a few things Real.

The first is learn the difference between Architects and PHD`s

The Second is to read what the American Institute of Architects thinks about Gage.
http://www.architectmagazine.com/architecture/architects-shy-from-truther-conspiracy-theory_1.aspx

I could suggest a third but might get a gold cmail.

quote:

The architects and engineers who have signed our petition reflect a wide range of disciplines and specialties. A great many hold degrees from nationally and internationally respected colleges and universities, and many have received high honors from their professional or academic communities. Many are principals of firms, and several dozen have designed high-rise structures similar to the World Trade Center buildings. For most, the length of professional experience can be measured not in years but in decades, and collectively, they comprise more than 30,000 years of qualified technical experience. In short, they are precisely the kinds of people that our society turns to when trying to understand complex events like the catastrophic destruction of the World Trade Center – that is, experts.

More than 75 AE911Truth petition signers hold Ph.D. degrees. More than 190 hold M.S. degrees. Nearly 100 of our architects are members of the American Institute of Architects (AIA). Seven of our signers are Fellows of the AIA (FAIA), one of the highest honors that the organization can bestow upon a member.

High-rise architect Daniel Barnum, FAIA, is one of the signers who holds this prestigious distinction, which reflects great personal and professional achievement. More than 75 AE911Truth petition signers hold Ph.D. degrees. With more than 40 years of experience, Barnum has worked on major high-rise office buildings in Houston, Texas, and was project manager for a 22-story high-rise office building in Akron, Ohio. In recalling the collapse of World Trade Center 7 in the film 9/11: Explosive Evidence—Experts Speak Out, Barnum said, “…a few fires in that building and, I mean, they weren’t even raging, and how could that cause a building to collapse? Couldn’t happen.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Someone still doesnt get what PHD means. Even a cursory glance at your list finds very few mantion of a PHD.

YOU keep spouting off about Gage and his group, so you best get used to people showing him up for what he is.

FEA......... You really think floors wont give way when taking the extra load from the floors above ? Are you that dense ? (Rhetorical)

Martyr for truth ?....... You wouldt know truth if it bit you on the fucking arse.

Keep posting the cartoons though, I am sure some clowns believe them to be true.

If you think the CIA/Mossad, took out Jowenko as he knew the truth, dont you think your years of spouting bullshit would have come to an end already.....

LMAO Indeed.

Gage is a clown but you are the fucking circus.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
well little mention of them does not negate their existence as active members.

quote:

No I am not spouting off about gage, I am spouting off about the evidence he lays on the table. Others can figure out if there was a conspiracy, this is about the scientific approach to the matter.

quote:

Oh? In that case I stand down so you can instruct us what a phd is in your opinon?

quote:

Gage is only the spokes person to inform you what the group as a whole have concluded in the professional opinions. So I dont see how attacking him personally can possibly gain any points in a physics and engineering debate of the events of 911.

quote:

that is so funny I laugh my ass off every time I see it, but surprisingly there are people who cant distinguish between what to expect from symmetrical damage versus asymmetrical damage.

quote:

I do not know of any case (and I have looked extensively) of asymmetrical damage causing uniform symmetrical failure at freefall in nature. Do you?

quote:

This was a battle that the so called 911 myth busters or debunkers better know as official story huggers fought ferociously to no avail for years.

Its very simple really to explain the difference and what should have been expected under those conditions.

quote:

I dont know of any situation where fire can make steel look like that do you?

quote:

He cant be all bad since they invited him to present the issues on CSpan Journal.

quote:

I am sure Jowekos untimely death immediately following his interview where he stated that it was a demolition was just another one of those unfortunate "coincidences" right?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Two things: asymmetrical damage and symmetrical damage can make them fall straight down. We do it in aikijutsu all the time.

Additionally we have no proof that the hole in the thing lying on grass (on grass mind you) came from or was anywhere in New York, let alone at the WTC. Don't forget, you are the dumbass who showed me pylon rings and claimed they were bent circular from WTC and the conundrum of conspiracy from that piece of fucking junk--- from the fucking site prisonplanet. (Where you get a great deal of your asswipe from)

Again, all these perfect theories of engineering do not account for Sammy the bull Gravano.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
There you go with the Gage bullshit again

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nope, nothing nefarious about any of that iron, all pretty normal looking from fire and collapse, and nothing certifiable or credible that any of that came from WTC.

None of that was the pictures you showed, when you were telling me you were a certified welder but couldnt identify plasma cutting slag.

So, you have pictures of something in iron debris, but nobody knows of what. With nothing at all strange about them from what I can see.

You show iron in the grass, with water in the background as well as houses, and there is nothing like that near WTC. The bulk of the steel debris from WTC was shipped (by barge, or by truck) to 4 salvage yards in NJ, and those pictures are not from salvage yards.