quote:

ORIGINAL: LittleGirlHeart

I have to go in october to get them scraped out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

quote:

ORIGINAL: LittleGirlHeart

I have to go in october to get them scraped out.

Have they told you what stage ? You should get a result of CIN 1, 2 or 3 (Cervical Intra-epithelial Neoplasia). CIN 1 indicates mild cell change. CIN 2 indicates moderate changes and CIN 3 indicates more severe changes but its still not cancer. Its likely they picked up CIN 1 on your smear test and that's why you had the colposcopy. That gives much more accurate results. I showed up CIN 1 on a smear and CIN 3 on the colposcopy before having laser treatment under local anaesthetic. The treatment isn't at all painful and you should be allowed home the same day.

Its good that they were thorough and they found it nice and early. Too many women don't have regular smears. Sounds like you do... well done and don't worry. You are in good hands.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant

That sux. I'm sorry this landed on you :(

quote:

ORIGINAL: LittleGirlHeart

Maria, No. At first after the pap it was just abnormal cells, so we want a colposcopy, then it was ok, well they're not alarming yet, we want to check in about a years time. So papsmear again, and again abnormal cells, so again a.colposcopy and this time it came back pre cancerous. So they're doing a leep procedure. It's way less invasive than a cone biopsyshe said.

A few of my friends have said they have had pc cells show up and after a scraping th ey were completely ok for years . That's heartening.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

quote:

ORIGINAL: LittleGirlHeart

I have to go in october to get them scraped out.

Have they told you what stage ? You should get a result of CIN 1, 2 or 3 (Cervical Intra-epithelial Neoplasia). CIN 1 indicates mild cell change. CIN 2 indicates moderate changes and CIN 3 indicates more severe changes but its still not cancer. Its likely they picked up CIN 1 on your smear test and that's why you had the colposcopy. That gives much more accurate results. I showed up CIN 1 on a smear and CIN 3 on the colposcopy before having laser treatment under local anaesthetic. The treatment isn't at all painful and you should be allowed home the same day.

Its good that they were thorough and they found it nice and early. Too many women don't have regular smears. Sounds like you do... well done and don't worry. You are in good hands.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

quote:

ORIGINAL: LittleGirlHeartIt is a frightening thing when you hear the word "cancer" even "pre cancerous" but this is the whole point of regular smear tests.

Just so you know, I never had any further problems. They zapped the bad bits 20 years ago and I've never had an inconclusive or suspect smear test since.

_____________________________


We'll fight, not out of spite
For someone must stand up for what's right
'Cause where there's a man who has no voice
There ours shall go singing

(in reply to MariaB)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Everyone should be taking 100 MG of Amygdalin a day now. EVERYBODY. Cancer patients should be taking 1000 to 1500 MG per day.

Please do not recite the usual NIH and FDA bullshit. (Laetrile is another name for the chemical amygdalin, which is found in the pits of many fruits and in numerous plants. Cyanide is thought to be the main anticancer component of laetrile. [IT is ONLY one]

Laetrile was first used as a cancer treatment in Russia in 1845, and in the United States in the 1920s. Laetrile has shown little anticancer activity in animal studies and no anticancer activity in human clinical trials. [bullshit] Laetrile is not approved for use in the United States. Inappropriate advertisement of laetrile as a cancer treatment has resulted in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigation that culminated in charges and conviction of one distributor.

The FDA has never done a full blown, objective untainted cancer study on Amygdalin.

The above is unmitigated bullshit resulting in far too many cancer patients resorting to Chemo. Fine...chemo kills cancer cells...then kills the patient. Some...few survive the chemo...most don't. Why ?

Because chemo releases a protein from healthy red blood cells that actually begins to feed the cancer. That's why early chemo therapy shows progress and even shows remission. But soon thereafter, the cancer returns with a vengeance and almost always the patient succumbs.

Chemo has been described as a $200 billion scam and I believe it. Why is Amygdalin successfully used in Mexico and Europe ?

Not being a bacteria or a virus, cancer...is an anemia. The AARP and medical research has shown a diet of certain foods to all to present a significant lowering of the incidence of cancer. Why ? Strange how they all have Amygdalin in them.

Medical science said the same thing about citric fruits curing scurvy and liver (iron) curing rickets. (pernicious anemia) It was all quackery and medical science was sure those two, were infectious diseases.

Just like we take ascorbic acid, folic acid, niacin and the rest of the B complex...start taking B17 (Amygdalin) NOW !!

quote:

ORIGINAL: DommeinRochester

If you don't mind Dr. Bombay, could you please explain on what medical authority you are stating that I should be taking cyanide?

As a post cancer patient (I kicked cancer's ass in May 2013) I take certain things, and I avoid other things that could cause a return of uglies. Depending on other's particulars, they may need to take things, I avoid. Why? Because ALL cancers are different! What impedes one can help another grow and grow. So please dial back on the blanket prescriptions.

http://www.livestrong.com/article/419847-amygdalin-cancer/


http://www.livestrong.com/article/468303-vitamin-b-17-for-cancer-cure/

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

The Hunza tribe is often cited as proof of the affects of amygdalin, however there are insufficient records to establish that proof. Present day research however does suggest a much lower incidence of cancer with a predominantly apricot and apricot pit diet. (750 to 1000 MG per week)

When one looks at where there are records one finds a better results with the Hopi Native Americans, Navajo Native Americans, and Eskimos however. If you add in other international research...a picture emerges.

* The incidence of cancer among the Hopi Native Americans is 1 in 1000 as compared to 1 in 4 for the USA as a whole
* Prostate cancer varies widely between different countries, even more than breast cancer
* White South Africans have seventeen times more large bowel cancer than black South Africans.
* North America, Europe, Australia have very high rates of colorectal cancer compared to Africa, Asia, and Central and South America.
* The Czech Republic has a death rate of 34.19 per 100,000 male, while Bangladesh has a rate of 0.63 per 100,000 males as pertains to colorectal cancer.

So yes, there are varying rates, types of and deaths from cancer but what emerges is something different than what the western medical cancer industrial complex will tell you and what NCI (NIH) and the FDA will tell you who with the pharmaceuticals have an extremely profitable status quo in the 'treatment' of cancer.

Vitamin D is also found to have an effect on cancer rates and the whole point of discussion begs the question why ?

Why has there not been a complete FDA untainted, unbiased and un-corrupted study into the effects of these supplements on the incidence of cancer ? Why without this research therapies and supplements are banned...even outlawed including ozone research and therapy.

Because they just might find that if people were to use these therapies and concentrate there diets in the proper foods and supplements...cancer would vanish or come close to it and there goes literally billion$ in profits.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: DommeinRochester

If you don't mind Dr. Bombay, could you please explain on what medical authority you are stating that I should be taking cyanide?

As a post cancer patient (I kicked cancer's ass in May 2013) I take certain things, and I avoid other things that could cause a return of uglies. Depending on other's particulars, they may need to take things, I avoid. Why? Because ALL cancers are different! What impedes one can help another grow and grow. So please dial back on the blanket prescriptions.

http://www.livestrong.com/article/419847-amygdalin-cancer/


http://www.livestrong.com/article/468303-vitamin-b-17-for-cancer-cure/

These all contain cyanide:
almonds
millet sprouts
lima beans
soy
spinach
bamboo shoots
cassava

Additionally cyanide is found in most any fruits that have a pit, or core, like cherries, apricots, and apples.

From your own link: "Studies on the effects of amygdalin in clinical trials are sorely lacking."

These studies are sorely lacking because they work, just like Ozone therapy. Ozone therapy is also banned in the US. Gee, I wonder why.

Amygdalin is not a 'prescription' it is a dietary supplement the same as other dietary supplements.

Add to the list along with scurvy and rickets is cycle-cell anemia which presents when one with the genetic predisposition is taken away from their natural diet...they produce symptoms and in this case, is even called...an anemia. An anemia is a quantitative deficiency of the hemoglobin, i.e.m blood which can often be fixed with the proper diet or supplements.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
The Hunza tribe is often cited as proof of the affects of amygdalin, however there are insufficient records to establish that proof.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SinfulBashful

My gyno told me that when a woman gets cervical cancer its usually because she didn't have an exam for several years and it went untreated for a looong time. ITs not something that develops fast.

I think everything will turn out ok for you.