Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

"After the elections"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> "After the elections" Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
"After the elections" - 10/3/2014 5:51:03 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
"Really really this time"

"I am with the illegals, the lawbreakers"

"Rode over here with illegals"

http://fusion.net/story/19540/obama-tells-frustrated-latinos-im-going-to-need-you-to-have-my-back/

Grow some balls, little man

If its the right thing to do in your book, then do it now

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: "After the elections" - 10/3/2014 7:12:45 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
His balls sit atop your head, sonny. He is doing it even as we speak, your caterwauling having no effect.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: "After the elections" - 10/3/2014 7:37:37 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

"Really really this time"

"I am with the illegals, the lawbreakers"

"Rode over here with illegals"

http://fusion.net/story/19540/obama-tells-frustrated-latinos-im-going-to-need-you-to-have-my-back/

Grow some balls, little man

If its the right thing to do in your book, then do it now


The immigration issue is tricky for both parties, trying to balance out various factions who have different reasons for either supporting immigration reform or just continuing with the status quo. It's also tied in with other issues related to economic policy, foreign policy, and border security.

So, it's a very complicated enchilada on the President's plate, trying to placate different factions. None of his predecessors seemed to be able to figure out what to do either.

For a while, it seemed the Administration was concentrating more on those who employ illegal immigrants, not so much on the immigrants themselves. That might be the better approach. But there need to be laws with some real teeth in them that will provide for stiff fines and long jail terms for those who employ illegal immigrants. But neither party has the balls to do anything like that.

< Message edited by Zonie63 -- 10/3/2014 7:38:20 AM >

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: "After the elections" - 10/3/2014 11:37:14 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

CONGRESS CONTROLS IMMIGRATION

The Tea Party has stonewalled every attempt at reform.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: "After the elections" - 10/6/2014 3:33:19 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
CONGRESS CONTROLS IMMIGRATION
The Tea Party has stonewalled every attempt at reform.


But, the President is going to do whatever he can within his power to write EO's to get the stuff done; after the election. Is he too busy stumping for Democrats to do what he says he's going to do?

Does he think the elections are going to get him more Democrats to work with in Congress? These elections, under the most likely circumstances won't gain him Democrat majorities in both chambers, so the "Tea Party" will still be around to stonewall every attempt at reform.

What you're supporting is the President (who broke his promise because of opposing Congressional members) promising action when it's quite likely there will be even more opposing Congressional members.

He's trying to get Democrats elected. That's all he's doing. He's saying what he thinks they want to hear (and I think he's correct in what he thinks they want to hear) so they'll vote Democrat.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 2:01:35 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
The President's Approval Rating: 44% SOURCE
Congress's Approval Rating: 13% SOURCE

Congress's Rate of Turning Bills into Laws SOURCE

Whether one loves the President or not. He is not running for office. Members of Congress ARE running for office. Their inability to get shit done is costing this nation in many ways. That Republicans decide to take half a year off from their day job to pursue campaign funding should really piss most Americans off.

While Republicans say they have sent numerous bills to the Senate and are doing 'their job', reality is a different thing. No one cares how many bills have been sent. If they are not turned into laws, who cares? For the folks that don't understand this, consider the following: Democrats own the House and Republicans the Senate. The Democrats send 14,000+ bills that basically eliminate the 2nd amendment in every possible way. How many Republicans sign off on even one of those bills? None. Why? Because those bills are not the stuff Republicans would agree upon. Back to reality the Republican/Tea Party have sent hundreds of bills they know before hand, that Democrats would never sign off on. That Democrats have stated they'll come half way on bills, but expect the Republican/Tea Party to do the same. Unfortunately, the Republicans (and more so the Tea Party) have taken the stance of 'my way or go to hell!'. And that is not conductive to performance in Congress. The Republican/Tea Party have heavily contributed that low approval rating that exists in Congress.

You want a better Congress? Vote Democrat. Republicans and especially the Tea Party, crave power and money above all else. With less power and say, they'll stop going down the 'damnation route of conservatism' and walk back their crap to a more moderate level. In the meantime this nation would see many projects that have been stonewalled finally get finished. A better border security, immigration, campaign reform, infrastructure improvements, education, foreign policy improvements, and several other areas.


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 3:43:02 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The President's Approval Rating: 44% SOURCE
Congress's Approval Rating: 13% SOURCE
Congress's Rate of Turning Bills into Laws SOURCE
Whether one loves the President or not. He is not running for office. Members of Congress ARE running for office. Their inability to get shit done is costing this nation in many ways. That Republicans decide to take half a year off from their day job to pursue campaign funding should really piss most Americans off.
While Republicans say they have sent numerous bills to the Senate and are doing 'their job', reality is a different thing. No one cares how many bills have been sent. If they are not turned into laws, who cares? For the folks that don't understand this, consider the following: Democrats own the House and Republicans the Senate. The Democrats send 14,000+ bills that basically eliminate the 2nd amendment in every possible way. How many Republicans sign off on even one of those bills? None. Why? Because those bills are not the stuff Republicans would agree upon. Back to reality the Republican/Tea Party have sent hundreds of bills they know before hand, that Democrats would never sign off on. That Democrats have stated they'll come half way on bills, but expect the Republican/Tea Party to do the same. Unfortunately, the Republicans (and more so the Tea Party) have taken the stance of 'my way or go to hell!'. And that is not conductive to performance in Congress. The Republican/Tea Party have heavily contributed that low approval rating that exists in Congress.
You want a better Congress? Vote Democrat. Republicans and especially the Tea Party, crave power and money above all else. With less power and say, they'll stop going down the 'damnation route of conservatism' and walk back their crap to a more moderate level. In the meantime this nation would see many projects that have been stonewalled finally get finished. A better border security, immigration, campaign reform, infrastructure improvements, education, foreign policy improvements, and several other areas.


Congress's "job" isn't to pass laws. You don't judge a Congress according to the number of laws passed, but in the number of laws passed compared to the number of laws needed. That the voters in America disagree on how many laws need passed is clearly evident.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 4:57:18 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

He's trying to get Democrats elected. That's all he's doing. He's saying what he thinks they want to hear (and I think he's correct in what he thinks they want to hear) so they'll vote Democrat.




I think that pretty much sums up most of his term.

and before anyone jumps on this, yes the other side does it too.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 7:06:10 AM   
hot4bondage


Posts: 403
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline
Yes indeed. The agency tasked with keeping track of our laws says they can't do it anymore. We literally have more laws, codes, and regulations than we can count. There's a case before the Supremes right now because a patrol officer didn't know the brake light law for his state.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 7:25:31 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The President's Approval Rating: 44% SOURCE
Congress's Approval Rating: 13% SOURCE
Congress's Rate of Turning Bills into Laws SOURCE
Whether one loves the President or not. He is not running for office. Members of Congress ARE running for office. Their inability to get shit done is costing this nation in many ways. That Republicans decide to take half a year off from their day job to pursue campaign funding should really piss most Americans off.
While Republicans say they have sent numerous bills to the Senate and are doing 'their job', reality is a different thing. No one cares how many bills have been sent. If they are not turned into laws, who cares? For the folks that don't understand this, consider the following: Democrats own the House and Republicans the Senate. The Democrats send 14,000+ bills that basically eliminate the 2nd amendment in every possible way. How many Republicans sign off on even one of those bills? None. Why? Because those bills are not the stuff Republicans would agree upon. Back to reality the Republican/Tea Party have sent hundreds of bills they know before hand, that Democrats would never sign off on. That Democrats have stated they'll come half way on bills, but expect the Republican/Tea Party to do the same. Unfortunately, the Republicans (and more so the Tea Party) have taken the stance of 'my way or go to hell!'. And that is not conductive to performance in Congress. The Republican/Tea Party have heavily contributed that low approval rating that exists in Congress.
You want a better Congress? Vote Democrat. Republicans and especially the Tea Party, crave power and money above all else. With less power and say, they'll stop going down the 'damnation route of conservatism' and walk back their crap to a more moderate level. In the meantime this nation would see many projects that have been stonewalled finally get finished. A better border security, immigration, campaign reform, infrastructure improvements, education, foreign policy improvements, and several other areas.


Congress's "job" isn't to pass laws. You don't judge a Congress according to the number of laws passed, but in the number of laws passed compared to the number of laws needed. That the voters in America disagree on how many laws need passed is clearly evident.


Actually, according to a small document called 'The US Constitution', it IS Congress's job to pass laws. Because if they didn't past laws, how does anything get done? To hire interns for Senator 'So and So' requires a bill to become law. To pass a budget for the next year, requires a bill to be pass into law. To allow funds to be diverted from one area to support an emergency fund on a disaster, requires a bill to be pass. How did the Affordable Care Act come into law, if not pass by Congress? You were alive and on planet Earth in 2009-2010, right?

I judge Congress on what they get done. What issues have come up in the last year's time? Immigration? Border Security? The Federal Budget? The US Debt? Infrastructure? Education? Student Loans? Health Care Issues? An what has Congress done to address these problems? There is a reason why they have a 13% approval rating. And that its dropped mainly due to the Republican/Tea Party. Or have you forgotten which political party wanted to shut down the whole country? And WHY? Because they wanted a law removed because they couldn't do it any of the other hundreds of thousands of failed attempts. Imagine if things were reversed. That Democrats demanded the 2nd amendment be revoked as 'payment' to pass the budget bill; would conservative be pissed? Oh hell yeah! Just try to bullshit that they wouldn't. And that's what happen with the Partial Shutdown. The Tea Party wanted the ACA removed before Americans started enjoying some new found freedoms....




(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 7:34:57 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hot4bondage
Yes indeed. The agency tasked with keeping track of our laws says they can't do it anymore. We literally have more laws, codes, and regulations than we can count. There's a case before the Supremes right now because a patrol officer didn't know the brake light law for his state.


For the simple minded, yes, there are to many laws.

For those that can actually access libraries, smartphones, and computers; the information is pretty easy to come about.

Gallup a few months ago asked a question of those that they surveyed. "Can you name the five parts of the 1st amendment"? 90% of those polled couldn't answer one item. 8% got one answer while 1% got two to three correct answers. The last two parts of the 1st amendment were only known to less than 0.001% of those polled. The percentages have just stuck in my mind for somereason....

And I've been looking around for that poll for days now, since it would be an interesting topic to discuss. Trying to Google '1st amendment, survey, Gallup' and variations of it, have proved to be useless.

The point here, is that most Americans can rattle off the 1st amendment, WITHOUT, looking it up. Just the same as they cant rattle off how to set the DVR without looking it up. There is a reason why things are written down. So the officer couldn't remember the exact law; could the person rattle off the 4th amendment perfectly?



(in reply to hot4bondage)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 1:13:12 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: hot4bondage
Yes indeed. The agency tasked with keeping track of our laws says they can't do it anymore. We literally have more laws, codes, and regulations than we can count. There's a case before the Supremes right now because a patrol officer didn't know the brake light law for his state.


For the simple minded, yes, there are to many laws.

For those that can actually access libraries, smartphones, and computers; the information is pretty easy to come about.

Gallup a few months ago asked a question of those that they surveyed. "Can you name the five parts of the 1st amendment"? 90% of those polled couldn't answer one item. 8% got one answer while 1% got two to three correct answers. The last two parts of the 1st amendment were only known to less than 0.001% of those polled. The percentages have just stuck in my mind for somereason....

And I've been looking around for that poll for days now, since it would be an interesting topic to discuss. Trying to Google '1st amendment, survey, Gallup' and variations of it, have proved to be useless.

The point here, is that most Americans can rattle off the 1st amendment, WITHOUT, looking it up. Just the same as they cant rattle off how to set the DVR without looking it up. There is a reason why things are written down. So the officer couldn't remember the exact law; could the person rattle off the 4th amendment perfectly?





I thought that there were six parts.

1. Establishment of religion
2. Free exercise of religion
3. Freedom of speech
4. Freedom of press
5. Freedom to assemble
6. Petition for redress of grievance.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 1:30:44 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

I thought that there were six parts.

1. Establishment of religion
2. Free exercise of religion
3. Freedom of speech
4. Freedom of press
5. Freedom to assemble
6. Petition for redress of grievance.



I'm pretty sure that the parts you have listed as 1 & 2 are, actually one part.

I think the issue is that while the God-haters amongst us love to moan and wail about non-establishment, they hate to have to admit that we have a right to practice religion as we may seem fit.

People that get bothered by my belief aren't atheists; they're God-hating control freaks that want to wipe out any belief in any higher power (except, as evidenced here, lately, if we're speaking of "Allah").







Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 10/7/2014 2:22:35 PM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 2:05:28 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
And while the nutsuckers piss and moan paranoiacally about how their magical skywizard is 'hated', the religion of no-religion is also a religion. so, freedom to practice that religion is also a free speech. Suck a wad of cowpiss, Godfreaks.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/7/2014 2:06:20 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 2:31:41 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And while the nutsuckers piss and moan paranoiacally about how their magical skywizard is 'hated', the religion of no-religion is also a religion. so, freedom to practice that religion is also a free speech. Suck a wad of cowpiss, Godfreaks.

It's also amusing how those who claim to be followers of the invisible sky wizard so seldom live their lives according to his teachings and are so often morally reprehensible buckets of pus.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 3:01:46 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The President's Approval Rating: 44% SOURCE
Congress's Approval Rating: 13% SOURCE
Congress's Rate of Turning Bills into Laws SOURCE
Whether one loves the President or not. He is not running for office. Members of Congress ARE running for office. Their inability to get shit done is costing this nation in many ways. That Republicans decide to take half a year off from their day job to pursue campaign funding should really piss most Americans off.
While Republicans say they have sent numerous bills to the Senate and are doing 'their job', reality is a different thing. No one cares how many bills have been sent. If they are not turned into laws, who cares? For the folks that don't understand this, consider the following: Democrats own the House and Republicans the Senate. The Democrats send 14,000+ bills that basically eliminate the 2nd amendment in every possible way. How many Republicans sign off on even one of those bills? None. Why? Because those bills are not the stuff Republicans would agree upon. Back to reality the Republican/Tea Party have sent hundreds of bills they know before hand, that Democrats would never sign off on. That Democrats have stated they'll come half way on bills, but expect the Republican/Tea Party to do the same. Unfortunately, the Republicans (and more so the Tea Party) have taken the stance of 'my way or go to hell!'. And that is not conductive to performance in Congress. The Republican/Tea Party have heavily contributed that low approval rating that exists in Congress.
You want a better Congress? Vote Democrat. Republicans and especially the Tea Party, crave power and money above all else. With less power and say, they'll stop going down the 'damnation route of conservatism' and walk back their crap to a more moderate level. In the meantime this nation would see many projects that have been stonewalled finally get finished. A better border security, immigration, campaign reform, infrastructure improvements, education, foreign policy improvements, and several other areas.

Congress's "job" isn't to pass laws. You don't judge a Congress according to the number of laws passed, but in the number of laws passed compared to the number of laws needed. That the voters in America disagree on how many laws need passed is clearly evident.

Actually, according to a small document called 'The US Constitution', it IS Congress's job to pass laws. Because if they didn't past laws, how does anything get done? To hire interns for Senator 'So and So' requires a bill to become law. To pass a budget for the next year, requires a bill to be pass into law. To allow funds to be diverted from one area to support an emergency fund on a disaster, requires a bill to be pass. How did the Affordable Care Act come into law, if not pass by Congress? You were alive and on planet Earth in 2009-2010, right?
I judge Congress on what they get done. What issues have come up in the last year's time? Immigration? Border Security? The Federal Budget? The US Debt? Infrastructure? Education? Student Loans? Health Care Issues? An what has Congress done to address these problems? There is a reason why they have a 13% approval rating. And that its dropped mainly due to the Republican/Tea Party. Or have you forgotten which political party wanted to shut down the whole country? And WHY? Because they wanted a law removed because they couldn't do it any of the other hundreds of thousands of failed attempts. Imagine if things were reversed. That Democrats demanded the 2nd amendment be revoked as 'payment' to pass the budget bill; would conservative be pissed? Oh hell yeah! Just try to bullshit that they wouldn't. And that's what happen with the Partial Shutdown. The Tea Party wanted the ACA removed before Americans started enjoying some new found freedoms....


The Constitution vests the authority to make laws in Congress. But, that doesn't mean they have to write laws. If the majority in Congress doesn't feel a new law has to be written, why should it write a law? If the majority in Congress feel legislation presented isn't good law, why should it be passed?

The GOP and the Democrats don't agree on how to address any of the issues you listed. What law should have been written, in that case?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 3:18:35 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

I thought that there were six parts.

1. Establishment of religion
2. Free exercise of religion
3. Freedom of speech
4. Freedom of press
5. Freedom to assemble
6. Petition for redress of grievance.



I'm pretty sure that the parts you have listed as 1 & 2 are, actually one part.

I think the issue is that while the God-haters amongst us love to moan and wail about non-establishment, they hate to have to admit that we have a right to practice religion as we may seem fit.

People that get bothered by my belief aren't atheists; they're God-hating control freaks that want to wipe out any belief in any higher power (except, as evidenced here, lately, if we're speaking of "Allah").







Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?


No, I am pretty sure that they are not.

The Church of England is an establishment of religion. The religion is supported by the state. You are not allowed to do that in the US.

Both countries have freedom of religion which means you can worship or not as your conscious dictates.

KSA has an established religion and no freedom of religion. (They arrest Christians for participating in private services.)

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 3:41:43 PM   
deathtothepixies


Posts: 683
Joined: 2/19/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr



People that get bothered by my belief aren't atheists; they're God-hating control freaks


[/color]



Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

your personal beliefs are irrelevant, you are one idiot on a message board, get over it.

last time I checked atheists don't believe in god, so it would be tricky for them to hate god.

What atheists "hate" is the way god believers stop the world from moving forward.

The hate is always from the believers, not the other way round.

Stop being so frightened

_____________________________


The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: "After the elections" - 10/7/2014 3:50:23 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

I'm pretty sure that the parts you have listed as 1 & 2 are, actually one part.

I think the issue is that while the God-haters amongst us love to moan and wail about non-establishment, they hate to have to admit that we have a right to practice religion as we may seem fit.


Can you point to any posts by atheists that seek to deny your right to practice religion as you see fit. It seems like somewhat of a generalisation to me.

quote:




People that get bothered by my belief aren't atheists; they're God-hating control freaks that want to wipe out any belief in any higher power (except, as evidenced here, lately, if we're speaking of "Allah").







Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?


So, you do distinguish between "Atheists" and "God Haters"?

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: "After the elections" - 10/8/2014 4:29:08 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

No, I am pretty sure that they are not.



I must be doing something wrong because I'm being misunderstood a lot more than usual, lately.

Here's the detailed version.

I'm almost positive that most people view your Nos. 1 & 2 as one part (of what someone else proposed of the five) and here's why:

There's a bunch of people that will refer to:

quote:


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ...


as "freedom of religion". Then, there's a certain segment that will refer to that same passage as "Non-establishment" or (more incorrectly) "separation of church and state". I think both of these types of people will identify the entire clause as either one or the other.

As a result, non-establishment and free exercise generally meld into one "part". There's no need to argue this, really. I'll bet if you found people that could recite the first amendment and asked them to break it down, you'd find that most agree with "five parts".







Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> "After the elections" Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.129