RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real

RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

Rules/ToS that you thought were real

There are rules here?

28% (8)

I know all the rules for I am God here

10% (3)

I'm pretty sure I know the rules but I am fallible

60% (17)

Total Votes : 28

(last vote on : 1/5/2016 7:20:46 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 4:39:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK I dont think I have ever read TOS, hell I couldnt even tell ya where they are located, but I just figure, be cool and youre good. From time to time, I fail at that, but no ones perfect. I think the ones of us that have been here a while or are regular pretty much know. Its more so the newer posters that I see get in trouble. Anarchy works here, mostly. Until the sock puppets begin to breed. quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK Oh and ET, the rules are here only for you, we get to be wild hetherns lol That explains the Exile (sad face)

LiveSpark -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 5:31:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moderator3 I am not upset, just tired and missing things. I am glad the thread is here though. I may not be able to answer, but I can read and try to see what the needs are and eventually get to things so people can understand. My hospital stays have just about done me in and I am trying to catch up so I can make some money. lol So its double days for me. This could actually be funny. Till next time, you all have fun. You just concentrate on YOU and getting better. We're fine here, for the most part people are good.

LiveSpark -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 6:07:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK I dont think I have ever read TOS, hell I couldnt even tell ya where they are located, but I just figure, be cool and youre good. From time to time, I fail at that, but no ones perfect. I think the ones of us that have been here a while or are regular pretty much know. Its more so the newer posters that I see get in trouble. Oh and ET, the rules are here only for you, we get to be wild hetherns lol Same here. It isn't rocket science, respect others, behave yourself and (most of the time) there are no problems.

satanscharmer -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 7:05:19 AM)
I know there are rules but I scanned very quickly through them, just like any other terms of service agreements. A lot of the stuff seems like common sense to me. If I were to break one it is most likely because the rule doesn't make sense at all in my mind. I've seen the 'do not mention another poster in a thread where that poster being mentioned isn't, unless it is something positive' referenced a few times. I didn't know if it was a rule or not, but it makes sense to me. Not every poster visits every thread and reads every post. I don't think it a fair fight, the person being mentioned may not have the ability to defend themselves and seems similar to blacklisting. I am curious as to why some threads disappear in their entirety while others are just edited, warnings posted, and/or eventually locked. What makes a thread poof worthy?

Kaliko -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 1:31:26 PM)
FR LOL What a different world here than a year or so ago when everyone was claiming with disdain that of course they read the TOS before they join a discussion board, doesn't everybody? (rolls eyes) I do like this place much better without sticks up everybody's asses.

CreativeDominant -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 3:22:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: satanscharmer I know there are rules but I scanned very quickly through them, just like any other terms of service agreements. A lot of the stuff seems like common sense to me. If I were to break one it is most likely because the rule doesn't make sense at all in my mind. I've seen the 'do not mention another poster in a thread where that poster being mentioned isn't, unless it is something positive' referenced a few times. I didn't know if it was a rule or not, but it makes sense to me. Not every poster visits every thread and reads every post. I don't think it a fair fight, the person being mentioned may not have the ability to defend themselves and seems similar to blacklisting. I am curious as to why some threads disappear in their entirety while others are just edited, warnings posted, and/or eventually locked. What makes a thread poof worthy? The answer to your last question is......me.[;)]

satanscharmer -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 7:46:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant The answer to your last question is......me.[;)] I KNEW IT! Darn it CD, will ya quit causing trouble please. Sheesh.

Moderator3 -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 7:54:04 PM)
Yeah, he sent me email and I'm afraid to open it. [:D]

Moderator3 -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 7:59:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: satanscharmer I know there are rules but I scanned very quickly through them, just like any other terms of service agreements. A lot of the stuff seems like common sense to me. If I were to break one it is most likely because the rule doesn't make sense at all in my mind. I've seen the 'do not mention another poster in a thread where that poster being mentioned isn't, unless it is something positive' referenced a few times. I didn't know if it was a rule or not, but it makes sense to me. Not every poster visits every thread and reads every post. I don't think it a fair fight, the person being mentioned may not have the ability to defend themselves and seems similar to blacklisting. I am curious as to why some threads disappear in their entirety while others are just edited, warnings posted, and/or eventually locked. What makes a thread poof worthy? Here is an example: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4778837 You can't see what was there before, but you can see quite a bit that may explain some of this. (Some, I am starting to hate that word and declarations of intent or anything that means I have to cover my butt, prove my intent or um, lots of everything. Nap time. *Oh god, I almost said nappy time. The UK members would have a hay day with that! [;)])

CreativeDominant -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/8/2015 8:06:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: satanscharmer quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant The answer to your last question is......me.[;)] I KNEW IT! Darn it CD, will ya quit causing trouble please. Sheesh. He...he...he...[:D]

satanscharmer -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/9/2015 5:53:56 AM)
Ok, thank you. There have been a few threads that stayed and it surprised me. The ones that disappear sometimes seem innocent but I only manage to catch at the opening, before any trouble, and therefore can't compare the removed threads to ones that are just moderated. I am kind of in awe things can go downhill that fast, but not entirely surprised. quote: ORIGINAL: Moderator3 Here is an example: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4778837 You can't see what was there before, but you can see quite a bit that may explain some of this. (Some, I am starting to hate that word and declarations of intent or anything that means I have to cover my butt, prove my intent or um, lots of everything. Nap time. *Oh god, I almost said nappy time. The UK members would have a hay day with that! [;)]) Lol. I used to say "nappy time" all the time until I learned (on here) it meant something entirely different in the UK. Hope you had a good one! Having to deal with that trouble-maker CD, you've certainly earned it.[:D]

CreativeDominant -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/9/2015 7:32:38 AM)
----»»» as innocent as freshly fallen snow«««----

UnholyBear -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/9/2015 10:09:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant ----»»» as innocent as freshly fallen snow«««---- In New York.

CreativeDominant -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/9/2015 12:39:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: UnholyBear quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant ----»»» as innocent as freshly fallen snow«««---- In New York. [sm=angry.gif][sm=anger.gif]

UnholyBear -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/10/2015 1:38:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote: ORIGINAL: UnholyBear quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant ----»»» as innocent as freshly fallen snow«««---- In New York. [sm=angry.gif][sm=anger.gif] damn that is so hot!! ~fans self~

RemoteUser -> RE: Rules/ToS that you thought were real (2/11/2015 8:54:47 PM)
I've been told that we have these rule things, but I've never needed to consciously consider any of them. Short of one incident I think might have happened about five years ago under my old moniker where a thread derailed and everyone got scolded, I don't think I've ever crossed any lines. I'm too sensible, maybe?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Spam Policy

0.046875