RE: Answering Messages.

RE: Answering Messages. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 6:36:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kittenluv954 quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I get very few messages, probably because OF my profile, but Ive had many, too many over the years that I wouldnt respond to, even if it meant winning the powerball jackpot. I dont send many either, except to people who are on the forums. but I really dont get the butthurt over your (generic your) intrusion being ignored because it failed to be important enough in my life. tough. I do respond to most of them......the smoking guy and the ants guy get short thrift with some evil thrown in, but...I get more idiots messaging me on fet than I ever have here.... dont forget mosquito guy... 500 buck! lol him too...he didnt like my scenario, I think it was a little too graphic for him[;)]

Kittenluv954 -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 6:55:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Kittenluv954 quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I get very few messages, probably because OF my profile, but Ive had many, too many over the years that I wouldnt respond to, even if it meant winning the powerball jackpot. I dont send many either, except to people who are on the forums. but I really dont get the butthurt over your (generic your) intrusion being ignored because it failed to be important enough in my life. tough. I do respond to most of them......the smoking guy and the ants guy get short thrift with some evil thrown in, but...I get more idiots messaging me on fet than I ever have here.... dont forget mosquito guy... 500 buck! lol him too...he didnt like my scenario, I think it was a little too graphic for him[;)] same. i actually agreed to his offer, and started getting creepy demanding his address and such. told him i was getting angry he wasnt responding, carried on for a bit until i was sure he was more creeped out by me than i was by him. lastly, i saved the exchange, and serve him copy pasta when he shows up in my inbox on yet another profile lol. its been awhile though.

Lucylastic -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 7:00:07 AM)
lol nice one:)

DesFIP -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 7:00:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub I am guessing this is not directed at me... is it...lol Butch Certainly not Butch. Half at the op and the rest at Daddy Satyr. But if you don't expect a woman in the street to respond to your catcalls and you understand why she hurries away, then why wouldn't you understand when she does the same thing online. Generic you

DaddySatyr -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 11:12:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NookieNotes quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: NookieNotes And again, no one is entitled to anything from anyone without a previous agreement in place. Can you do me a favor? Can you show me where I said that anyone was *entitled* to a response? I did say that those that don't respond are rude (and I might have used the words "ignorant" and "self-important"), but can you show me where I said that *anyone* (myself, included) was *entitled* to a response? Michael I simply used the word you used from the quote that was right before that in my post ([in red, bold and brackets, per me]): quote: ORIGINAL: NookieNotes quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr Once, again, the argument you seem to be making is that I'm not [entitled] to a response because of how *someone else* dis-respected you. In my world, that argument leads to a bad place. If I treated people based upon how others treated me, we wouldn't be having this discussion. I agree with this. I let each person make their own mistakes. That, however, is not how the human mind is designed to work, strictly speaking. The human mind is designed to avoid pain and to generalize. This is a simple result. And again, no one is entitled to anything from anyone without a previous agreement in place. Where, I actually agreed with you, mostly. I will give you half agreement with this since I used the word "entitled" to describe the non-responders and it got turned around. Post #7 quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr I like both of you. I think, on the whole you're really good eggs. However, this first "excuse" upon which you seem to be in agreement has not been borne out by my own experiences, here. I used to have a detailed profile with "bullet points" at the top and fuller explanations, below (I'm going to have to see if I have a copy of it, saved, somewhere). I think it was, essentially, my journal post from DEC 2011? I almost always send well thought-out e-mails unless I'm just touching base with someone with whom I've already spoken. The entitled, self-important, rude people can't be arsed to respond and then, they justify their behavior with clap-trap. That's the long and short of it. Michael I'm not saying that you turned the word around, Nookie but it does happen, here, frequently. Michael

DaddySatyr -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 11:20:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SinFix quote: I like both of you. I think, on the whole you're really good eggs. However, this first "excuse" upon which you seem to be in agreement has not been borne out by my own experiences, here. I used to have a detailed profile with "bullet points" at the top and fuller explanations, below (I'm going to have to see if I have a copy of it, saved, somewhere). I think it was, essentially, my journal post from DEC 2011? I almost always send well thought-out e-mails unless I'm just touching base with someone with whom I've already spoken. The Entitled, self-important, rude people can't be arsed to respond and then, they justify their behavior with clap-trap. That's the long and short of it. Michael Sorry, I think I clipped your name out of the top of the post.. but there is where you called anyone entitled... Now I have no real bone in this cause if you go back and read what I wrote, you will see that I am not one of those that you are berating for not responding. But was showing you why some women don't, also I should have made it more clear that most women don't start that behavior until they have received a lot of abusive emails back.. I should share with you one of the first guys I corresponded with on this site. Please to note: if you read or comprehend, I am calling the people who do not respond "entitled"; not the people who are waiting for a reply. While I'm here, I'd like to clarify a couple of things: In this lifestyle and on this website, we tend to conflate certain words and throw them around, willy-nilly. I have been guilty of this on this thread. I don't think anyone is entitled to respect since I believe that respect is to hold something or someone in high esteem. I absolutely believe that is earned. There is a definition of respect which goes something like "To avoid violation of". That is the ONLY aspect of the word to which I believe anyone is entitled. That said, I believe every human being is entitled to basic, common courtesy. I also believe that answering courteous messages is a basic common courtesy. That the people who do not practice this behavior don't agree that it is courteous is no mystery; just a pity. That people can be discourteous is no eye-opener to me. That they can be so shockingly proud of it, is. Michael

dcnovice -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 1:05:16 PM)
quote: the ants guy I'm afraid to ask.

Kittenluv954 -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 1:08:43 PM)
how is not responding to a message make anyone" entitled?" to what? sure, i have the right to reply or not, that doesnt entitle me to anything but that choice. it doesnt tell you anything more than i didnt reply, not about me, my life, my values, intentions, how i treat people, it tells you literally nothing. i didnt reply, thats it. everyone who doesnt reply to all their messages is a list of terrible things, why- because thats the way you see it, therefore it must be true? rofl what baseless butthurt bullshit lol. QQ moar.

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/14/2015 1:11:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr Once, again, the argument you seem to be making is that I'm not entitled to a response because of how *someone else* dis-respected you. Michael Okay, is there a semantics spin you want to put on this? You are qualifying your sense of entitlement to a response in the above. No matter how you break down, smoke screen, or attempt to crawfish, this is all about your sense of entitlement just because you say so.

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Answering Messages. (2/15/2015 3:37:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FeleciasubTV Wouldn't it be nice if people could reply to messages, even just a "thanks but no thanks". People view your profile so you message them thanking them for viewing and explaining what you are seeking. They read your message and can't even be bothered to reply. Politeness doesn't cost anything. Thanks but no thanks. (Feel better?)

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.515625E-02