RE: Full human toilet?? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

knees2you -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/2/2006 11:43:15 PM)

quote:

Personally, I think disgust should be reserved for those who engage in sex acts with children, animals, the dead or the disabled.  Everything else is 2 or more adults agreeing to enjoy each other.

 
Thinking about this,
I'm Curious or just wondering.
Has anybody seen 2 male elephants getting it on?
Or any 2 male or female Animals?[&:]
 
Guess where the only ones.[8|]
 
Always, Ant[;)]
 
 



drogtar -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/3/2006 12:11:16 AM)

better to be a toliet that buy golden ring for lady
    poor misarible miners work to get ring



fartsniffer -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/3/2006 5:21:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

Im going to comment on open-mindedness rather than scat, as it was touched on a few times in this thread.   The thing about open-mindedness is that the tolerance has to flow in both directions   If we are going to accept those who are trying to explain how wonderful and beautiful this is to them, then by the same token we have to accept those who say its disgusting to them.  If someone should be able to express in this forum their preferences for such play, another should be able to express their dislike of it.  Neither is right or wrong.  Scolding people for having a *negative* opinion about something, while advocating those who have a positive opinion about the same topic, seems somehow hypocritical.   



I disagree.
Fair enough someone can say if an activity is not there cup of tea but to say it is disgusting is unfair,especially on a bdsm site that is supposed to be open minded.

Its like me saying that gay sex is disgusting because i am not gay.
But it is not its right for other girls and guys but not me.
So i disagree.



timeoutgurlie -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/3/2006 9:30:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: knees2you

quote:

Personally, I think disgust should be reserved for those who engage in sex acts with children, animals, the dead or the disabled.  Everything else is 2 or more adults agreeing to enjoy each other.

 
Thinking about this,
I'm Curious or just wondering.
Has anybody seen 2 male elephants getting it on?
Or any 2 male or female Animals?[&:]
 
Guess where the only ones.[8|]
 
Always, Ant[;)]
 
 


We're the only ones what?  Having sex with the same sex?  I know I've read that some animals do the same, can't remember if elephants were on the possible homo list or not.

Now I have to wonder if your question was serious or if you're mocking me some how...I cry now [:(] lol [8D]



redjeepcherokee -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/3/2006 11:03:50 AM)

YOY GUYS ARE FULL OF SHIT> LOL



MistyMenthal -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/4/2006 5:24:17 PM)

quote:

We're the only ones what?  Having sex with the same sex?  I know I've read that some animals do the same, can't remember if elephants were on the possible homo list or not.

Now I have to wonder if your question was serious or if you're mocking me some how...I cry now [:(] lol [8D]


Um What animals would be on a Homo list?
And if there is any, It makes it right for Us?

quote:

YOU GUYS ARE FULL OF SHIT> LOL


No Eating, No Tasting, No Telling!  Opps That's Willy Wonka [&:]

BLOWING KISSES Misty



SeekingaServant -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/4/2006 5:28:18 PM)

Just a fast factual reply...I am not saying I agree with or disagree with anything...however, there is a certain species of lizard that has NO males.  Sometime and somewhere the last male died out.  Now the only way they reproduce is by cloning themselves. Everytime they go to lay eggs, they are producing little daughter clones. However, in order to have the stimulation to lay eggs they must be sexually stimulated...by another female.
Goodness, but I love the discovery channel! 



timeoutgurlie -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/4/2006 6:52:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistyMenthal

quote:

We're the only ones what?  Having sex with the same sex?  I know I've read that some animals do the same, can't remember if elephants were on the possible homo list or not.

Now I have to wonder if your question was serious or if you're mocking me some how...I cry now [:(] lol [8D]


Um What animals would be on a Homo list?
And if there is any, It makes it right for Us?

quote:

YOU GUYS ARE FULL OF SHIT> LOL


No Eating, No Tasting, No Telling!  Opps That's Willy Wonka [&:]

BLOWING KISSES Misty


I'm lost.  Are you asking if it's right for us humans to be gay because there's animals besides humans who are gay?  Was it a joke?  It's really hard to "get" people sometimes when it's all text on a screen [&:] lol

If it was a real question, my answer is we wouldn't need to see homosexuality in animals to make it "ok" for us, BUT, there's been studies done that shows homosexuality in the animal kingdom as well.  That's all I have [:-]



MistyMenthal -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/4/2006 9:25:33 PM)

quote:

Just a fast factual reply...I am not saying I agree with or disagree with anything...however, there is a certain species of lizard that has NO males.  Sometime and somewhere the last male died out.  Now the only way they reproduce is by cloning themselves. Everytime they go to lay eggs, they are producing little daughter clones. However, in order to have the stimulation to lay eggs they must be sexually stimulated...by another female.
Goodness, but I love the discovery channel! 


Oh My Really now?

I just finished watching a Show on Medical Marvels.
After that show, Anything is possible.
A Dog faced man with more hair then a Drag Queen.

Oh wait I might fit that.

BLOWING KISSES<Misty 



malakas -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/9/2006 11:54:45 PM)

My comments above have nothing to do with tolerance or intolerance.  If it is consensual and between adults, I pass no judgement.  My only focus has been on the markedly increased risk of contracting a serious illness if one ingests substantial amounts of feces daily or regularly, even if the feces provider is disease-free and has no medical condition.  I cannot provide hard data for the reason stated above:  there is none because no one's done a study.  Ingesting urine which is generally sterile can even pose health risks, but nothing compared to the health risks of eating feces. I am not saying to do it or not do it or that it's hot or disgusting - all I'm saying is that someone who does it should not be in denial about the very real increased risks of serious illness.



newdombbw -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/11/2006 12:56:51 PM)

Try this link:

www.manscat.com



ButtholeSniffer -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/16/2006 10:44:23 AM)

I think a person just needs to be particular and get to know their partner first. This should be applied with any form of play or sexual act though. As long as you know your partner is healthy and you have had your Hepatitus shots I don't think you have anything to worry about. My x-girlfriend used to shit in my mouth often. I would then lick her dirty asshole clean. I would swallow the residue shit from her asshole, but not the actual turds. This was simply because I was really new to shit play and thought it would kill me if I swallowed to much. (If I could go back in time knowing what I know now, she would never have needed a toilet because I would have consumed and swallowed everything that came out of her ass. Lol!) Anyway, that's been several years ago. I never got sick or even experienced the slightest signs of sickness. I haven't had the honor to have a girl shit in my mouth since then, but I have totally swallowed and consumed my own shit many times while fantasizing it was a Mistress's shit that I was eating. The only unpleasant experience I've had from actually eating large amounts of shit is some mild diareaha. 



hmmmmnbird -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/16/2006 10:21:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: timeoutgurlie

<snip>

Personally, I think disgust should be reserved for those who engage in sex acts with children, animals, the dead or the disabled.  Everything else is 2 or more adults agreeing to enjoy each other.


Not to highjack, but do you really think disabled people should not have sex? Or do you mean someone taking advantage of a mentally disabled person ?



timeoutgurlie -> RE: Full human toilet?? (6/16/2006 11:29:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hmmmmnbird

quote:

ORIGINAL: timeoutgurlie

<snip>

Personally, I think disgust should be reserved for those who engage in sex acts with children, animals, the dead or the disabled.  Everything else is 2 or more adults agreeing to enjoy each other.


Not to highjack, but do you really think disabled people should not have sex? Or do you mean someone taking advantage of a mentally disabled person ?


No, no, not physically disabled...of course not, they can choose who they have sex with just as well as anyone else.  I mean mentally disabled.  Ex:  Nursing staff who rape people who are in homes...I can't think of the proper wording, I'm on meds and pretty sick right now [:o]  Like, someone either born with /or an acquired brain injury, who doesn't have the faculties to *choose* to consent.

It's hard to gel my thoughts together right now, hope you know what I'm meaning to say here. 

Someone with a disability but who has full cognition isn't who I was talking about, I consider people physically challeneged to be just like an any able bodied person...obviously, because they are.



knees2you -> RE: Full human toilet?? (7/22/2006 12:41:49 AM)

quote:

Personally, I think disgust should be reserved for those who engage in sex acts with children, animals, the dead or the disabled.  Everything else is 2 or more adults agreeing to enjoy each other.

 
I believe as my Wife LilBecque does that
anytime the law comes into contact
where we might have to make a change, or
when it comes to the above mentioned,
that people tend to get Irate because they can't
have or do as they would like!
You can do some of the above mentioned as long
as you don't get caught, Right?
 
Kinda like reading the Bible. We are affraid of
what it might say, What we can or can not do.
It's the change that we are affraid of.
 
quote:

"Change is good! Well so is Dollars."
 
Ant, LilBecque[;)]




degradess -> RE: Full human toilet?? (7/22/2006 7:15:27 AM)

I have tried some scat and piss play.  I found it erotic and exciting, but I only do piss play with my dom, and not sure aobut being the reciever with scat.  I would have no problem being the giver.  Yes, I know many can't understand that kind of play.  It's not for just everyone.  Used as humiliation it's really hot though.  I talked to lots of people on alt who have done scat play and heard no ill effects so far.  I suppose there are always risks of course. That's why I only do it with my dom.  But consider the risks of bdsm play in total.  In extreme play there are many types of injuries you can sustain.    There is no "safe " way to play unless it's all verbal and no contact.   We are in this for that very thing to a degree.  Some might disagree with that I suppose.  To get back to the point on scat play, It's fun and hot with the right person, something I am glad I did try at least.   I might add it's gaining in popularity on the sites .   I suspect because of the taboo aspect of the whole thing.  Like a previous post said., anything but kids and the dead are off limits.  ....anything goes otherwise.



Master96 -> RE: Full human toilet?? (7/22/2006 8:10:15 AM)

The far thing I’ll make my slave do is to clean the bathroom. No pee no shit.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_494157/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#494157

Master96,



knees2you -> RE: Full human toilet?? (7/27/2006 9:27:27 AM)

Their are woman who love to give this
I once met one who wanted me Not to
swallow some of Her fluids, but all!
 
I still think that it is unsafe over the years.
 
Even if it was "Perfectly Clean"
people would still think it was "Gross"
 
Ant, and LilBecque[;)]



vagueimp -> RE: Full human toilet?? (7/27/2006 9:42:22 AM)

Your Master has a fabulous slave! As a fellow dom I have always had my subs drink from me. If you research it pee is not only harmless but regarded as medicinal in many cultures. However my reason in having my sub act as my urinal is because I regard it as the ultimate gesture of submission if you rule out shit. It would of course be great to dump on your v.attractive face and watch you rub it all over yourself before showering!



timeoutgurlie -> RE: Full human toilet?? (7/27/2006 8:50:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: knees2you

quote:

Personally, I think disgust should be reserved for those who engage in sex acts with children, animals, the dead or the disabled.  Everything else is 2 or more adults agreeing to enjoy each other.

 
I believe as my Wife LilBecque does that
anytime the law comes into contact
where we might have to make a change, or
when it comes to the above mentioned,
that people tend to get Irate because they can't
have or do as they would like!
You can do some of the above mentioned as long
as you don't get caught, Right?
 
Kinda like reading the Bible. We are affraid of
what it might say, What we can or can not do.
It's the change that we are affraid of.
 
quote:

"Change is good! Well so is Dollars."
 
Ant, LilBecque[;)]




I'm not sure I follow.  Are you saying people would be mad with laws that rule out any BDSM activity, and people would be irate?  Or are you saying the laws against sex with the dead or other living people/creatures who cannot give consent is the point where people became irate for not being able to do what they 'want' in those scenarios?

If someone's going to be irate over not being able to molest their child, fuck their dog, dig up a corpse or take advantage of an adult with the mental capacity of a child...hey, let them be angry, and hope they do get caught.  I think I'm pretty open minded, as long as there's consent there and it's two adults, I won't judge whatever they choose to do, but there are lines you just don't cross and whether you get caught or not shouldn't be what stops you. 

Sex without explicit or implicit consent should blacken one's soul [:o]



Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.5300293