RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone

Page: << < prev 8 9 [10] 11 12 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 9:01:02 AM

Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
FR
Religious freedom is a founding principle of this country, and that absolutely needs to be protected, cherished, and fought for.
But it would be great if those that claim to be Christians actually understood the words of Christ.

This law isn't just for Christians, but, I agree with your statements.

Yes but being christians in a large number would be the one with less consequences refusing service to a minority, if not they would be the first to protest against it, just think if a muslim started to refuse service to and not buy supplies from infidels in indiana, he would probably be out of business in a very short time so it would allow the fundamentalists in larger number to bully any minority they don't like.
I also agree with the contradiction in their way to be christians.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 9:23:43 AM

Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

http://www.vox.com/2015/3/22/8270411/california-lgbt-executions
Here is the link Eulero, its one of my posts, so he wont see it

I read the actual proposal text http://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008%20%28Sodomy%29_0.pdf the only thing came into my mind were the words "sti cazzi!" for the not italians can be translated in "what the fuck" with additional surprise and fear.

(in reply to Lucylastic)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 9:27:33 AM

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

A "sti cazzi!" moment indeed, heh one of the few italian words I know:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to eulero83)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 9:35:19 AM

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

hypocrite...there said it, pot calling the kettle black in extremis.
quote:

You bitching about someone else using insults is funny as hell. Can anyone say hypocrite?

Yes you said it, didn't think you would have a problem doing so. It's backing up your lies with any proof that you fail so miserably at. But just for shits and giggles I will ask. Where is the post where I said something and did something else.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to Lucylastic)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 10:38:47 AM

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Go play silly buggers elsewhere.
You are a hypocrite for bitching about insults.
You dont get to expand your goalposts.
At least not in my interactions with you.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to thishereboi)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 11:35:19 AM

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83
for what I heard they are collecting the signatures and if they reach the legal number there would be a balot about...

http://www.vox.com/2015/3/22/8270411/california-lgbt-executions
Here is the link Eulero, its one of my posts, so he wont see it

How could a guy like that become a lawyer? Anti-sodomy law? Seriously? Sodomy was originally meant to be anal sex. Period. So, even a man and a woman enjoying anal sex would be committing sodomy. Nowadays, it refers to anal or oral sex. I wonder if this guy has ever had a blowjob. If he has, does he get to be the first with a bullet in the head?
Apparently, many Californians from both sides of the aisle are fucked in the head (pun intended).

its not just californians.....
it Is christianity

Really? You're going to shit can an entire religious faith because of some jack asses (including Westboro Baptist Church dipshits)? That's even worse than condemning all who claim Islam as terrorists.

You've besmirched even more people than those who categorically slam Islam.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 11:38:33 AM

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
FR
Religious freedom is a founding principle of this country, and that absolutely needs to be protected, cherished, and fought for.
But it would be great if those that claim to be Christians actually understood the words of Christ.

This law isn't just for Christians, but, I agree with your statements.

Yes but being christians in a large number would be the one with less consequences refusing service to a minority, if not they would be the first to protest against it, just think if a muslim started to refuse service to and not buy supplies from infidels in indiana, he would probably be out of business in a very short time so it would allow the fundamentalists in larger number to bully any minority they don't like.
I also agree with the contradiction in their way to be christians.

This law is for anyone of any religious faith. Period.

Might a Christian get worked up quicker, or more easily than someone of another faith? Maybe.

Might a Christian in the US be less tolerant than someone of another faith? Maybe.

The law still is not limited to Christians. That would make it unConstitutional (or moreso, depending on how this law gets decided).

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to eulero83)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 4:47:02 PM

Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Yes you said it, didn't think you would have a problem doing so. It's backing up your lies with any proof that you fail so miserably at. But just for shits and giggles I will ask. Where is the post where I said something and did something else.

Pick a thread and we can go from there.

(in reply to thishereboi)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 4:51:18 PM

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Go play silly buggers elsewhere.
You are a hypocrite for bitching about insults.
You dont get to expand your goalposts.
At least not in my interactions with you.

Wrong again. I said "You bitching about someone else using insults is funny as hell. Can anyone say hypocrite?" and that is what I meant. If I had just bitched about throwing out insults than you would have been correct, but I didn't so once again you fail. What a surprise, not.

Now if your done trolling maybe we can get back to the topic.

I wonder how many gay business owners in Indiana are losing money to the boycott?

edited to add.. and polite sub do let us know if you have problem with the link, you seem to be great at asking for them but once again fail to do so yourself.

Now if your done trolling maybe we can get back to the topic.

< Message edited by thishereboi -- 3/29/2015 4:54:18 PM >

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to Lucylastic)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 4:58:59 PM

Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

I only have a problem with your general level of hypocrisy sweetie.

(in reply to thishereboi)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 5:23:54 PM

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I only have a problem with your general level of hypocrisy sweetie.

and yet can't come up with one link to back up your bullshit. SSDD

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to Politesub53)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/29/2015 5:34:31 PM

Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

SSDD....oh,the irony.

ROFLMAO....truly.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4

(in reply to thishereboi)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/30/2015 3:42:50 AM

Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

If the evil gop isn't trying to pick on gays that will kill this thread.

Well if it doesn't, this should explode joether's head:

Image source: Senate Transcript

Obama voted for the Illinois RFRA.

K.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kirata -- 3/30/2015 3:52:09 AM >

(in reply to BamaD)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/30/2015 4:01:53 AM

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

If the evil gop isn't trying to pick on gays that will kill this thread.

Well if it doesn't, this should explode joether's head:

Image source: Senate Transcript

Obama voted for the Illinois RFRA.

K.

yes...but we're sure Obama (like bill Clinton surely would have) has "evolved" on the subject...

(in reply to Kirata)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/30/2015 4:59:33 AM

Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

Funny that you mention that Bounty,cause I think he did "evolve" on the subject.Took Biden to get out in front of him,but he came around...

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4

(in reply to bounty44)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/30/2015 5:34:10 AM

Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Funny that you mention that Bounty,cause I think he did "evolve" on the subject.Took Biden to get out in front of him,but he came around...

So Obama used to be a tyrannical conservative pushing religious dogma down people's throats and in favor of people having the right to refuse to serve gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and transgendereds? Yeah, I don't think so. Maybe the law, despite its flaws, just doesn't do any of the things joether claimed it does in the first place.

K.

< Message edited by Kirata -- 3/30/2015 5:38:00 AM >

(in reply to slvemike4u)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/30/2015 6:03:01 AM

Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline

FR

Interesting bit of backstory:

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Kirata)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/30/2015 6:33:47 AM

Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

Interesting bit of backstory:

Interesting bit of backstory:

When a Democrat introduced the Federal RFRA, which Congress passed with overwhelming Democrat support, and which was signed into law by a Democrat president, it wasn't anti-gay. When 19 states enacted materially identical legislation, it wasn't anti-gay. But Indiana's materially identical law is anti-gay because some assholes are in a photo.

Tell me again who is lying?

K.

< Message edited by Kirata -- 3/30/2015 6:52:01 AM >

(in reply to dcnovice)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/30/2015 7:38:41 AM

Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

some assholes are in a photo

Not just any photo. The three antigay lobbyists are in positions of proximity and honor as the governor signs the bill.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Kirata)

RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone - 3/30/2015 7:48:41 AM

Posts: 403
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline

I think the disconnect comes from Indiana's tendency to be several years behind the curve on social issues, and the lobbyists' past political activity. The combination gives a strong appearance of impropriety. The law itself sounds fine to me. As a previous poster said, even the ACLU backed the Federal version. But Pence and his lackeys have consistently opposed the ACLU for decades. It would be foolish to assume that they are suddenly in cahoots.

(in reply to Kirata)

Page: << < prev 8 9 [10] 11 12 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone

Page: << < prev 8 9 [10] 11 12 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.086