quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Yes ... thank you for your input, Sanity.

May I just gently suggest to you that, perhaps, not *everything* I say about something that's happening in the USA has the subtext of 'Chortle, Britain is *so* much better than America'?

I mean, not telling you how to think ... just putting that out there, you know, as an abstract theory, a vague possibility, a fairy tale if you like ... you know?

If youre going to preach about Americas problems perhaps you had ought to first make sure that your own affairs are in order

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Yes ... thank you for your input, Sanity.

May I just gently suggest to you that, perhaps, not *everything* I say about something that's happening in the USA has the subtext of 'Chortle, Britain is *so* much better than America'?

I mean, not telling you how to think ... just putting that out there, you know, as an abstract theory, a vague possibility, a fairy tale if you like ... you know?

If youre going to preach about Americas problems perhaps you had ought to first make sure that your own affairs are in order

I'm a lefty, Sanity. Lefties bitch about the powers that be *in any given country, including their own*. The affairs of my own country are *not* in order, and some of the problems I see here are replicated in your own country.

Do you see how that works? As a lefty, you learn to see the faults in your own country's powerful people, and you thus you learn to see the faults in another country's powerful people.

It isn't a 'nationalist thing'. I'm well aware that the Americans saw us English off a couple of centuries ago ... I don't care and in many ways I sympathise. It's a thing that's based on 'suspicion of the powerful', whatever country we're talking about, very much - indeed, mostly - including my own.

Do you get it? Please, please tell me that you get it. My doctor is tired of patching up the cuts and bruises on my forehead after I've been bashing it against my desk. He gets pissed off at writing prescriptions that say "super-power migraine-killing tablets" and "Don't read any of Sanity's posts till your brain has stopped dripping out of the cracks in your forehead'.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Did you trust the Bush administration?

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Me derail...lol I was commenting on your post... how is that a derail... I think it is a good question after your statement... are you distrustful of all government administrations are just liberal ones?

Butch

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Did you trust the Bush administration?

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Why? do you vote for people you do not trust... is that wise?

Butch

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Did you trust the Bush administration?

Never trust any politician. I saw my first congressional bribe in 1985. I've seen city councils bought. Any politician will eventually screw you. I voted for Bush for one reason. Two Supreme Court appointments. Other than that he's a typical tax and spend liberal.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Did you trust the Bush administration?

Never trust any politician. I saw my first congressional bribe in 1985. I've seen city councils bought. Any politician will eventually screw you. I voted for Bush for one reason. Two Supreme Court appointments. Other than that he's a typical tax and spend liberal.

Plus Gore was a eco nut.
And Kerry betrayed his fellow servicemen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Did you trust the Bush administration?

Never trust any politician. I saw my first congressional bribe in 1985. I've seen city councils bought. Any politician will eventually screw you. I voted for Bush for one reason. Two Supreme Court appointments. Other than that he's a typical tax and spend liberal.

Plus Gore was a eco nut.
And Kerry betrayed his fellow servicemen.

You vote for your tribe and expect your politician will betray you. Of course, someone like Hillary has shown her only tribe is herself. So that doesn't count. But, no politician I've ever seen will stand fast.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
FR
IMHO, it doesn't much matter if such shootings are becoming more common. What *is* becoming more common is the number of headlining atrocities that involve violence between races; between the forces of law and of racial minorities, and involving deaths. This is *not* a good thing, in my view. Things don't look good in the USA, from this side of the pond, that's all I can say.

• White on White: 2,509 (83.5% of all white-victim murders)
  
• White on Black: 189 (7.6% of all black-victim murders)
  
• Black on Black: 2,245 (90.1% of all black-victim murders)
  
• Black on White: 409 (13.6% of all white-victim murders)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Did you trust the Bush administration?

Never trust any politician. I saw my first congressional bribe in 1985. I've seen city councils bought. Any politician will eventually screw you. I voted for Bush for one reason. Two Supreme Court appointments. Other than that he's a typical tax and spend liberal.

Plus Gore was a eco nut.
And Kerry betrayed his fellow servicemen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
FR
IMHO, it doesn't much matter if such shootings are becoming more common. What *is* becoming more common is the number of headlining atrocities that involve violence between races; between the forces of law and of racial minorities, and involving deaths. This is *not* a good thing, in my view. Things don't look good in the USA, from this side of the pond, that's all I can say.

"If it bleeds, it leads."

There are no "Black Lives Matter" protests when a black person kills another black person.

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls

Murders in 2013

• White on White: 2,509 (83.5% of all white-victim murders)
  
• White on Black: 189 (7.6% of all black-victim murders)
  
• Black on Black: 2,245 (90.1% of all black-victim murders)
  
• Black on White: 409 (13.6% of all white-victim murders)

Why is it such a big deal when a white person murders a black person, but not when a black person kills a white person? FFS, it happened twice as much!! Why aren't there "Black Lives Matter" protests when a black person kills another black person? In 2013, There were 3,005 white people murdered, and 2,491 black people murdered.

The reason it seems like it's happening more frequently is because it's being sensationalized to sell more advertising. Headlines are the hook, and blood, murder, and death are mighty hooks (as are anything the Kardashians do).

quote:

Of course, the problem with viewing the world, as McKesson does, in the quasi-Marxist terms of comprehensive “forces” and “structures” is that you end up bending the truth to fit your explanatory fictions. For instance, above, McKesson blames “whiteness” for the ostensibly “preferential” treatment of Dylann Roof.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
FR
IMHO, it doesn't much matter if such shootings are becoming more common. What *is* becoming more common is the number of headlining atrocities that involve violence between races; between the forces of law and of racial minorities, and involving deaths. This is *not* a good thing, in my view. Things don't look good in the USA, from this side of the pond, that's all I can say.

"If it bleeds, it leads."

There are no "Black Lives Matter" protests when a black person kills another black person.

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls

Murders in 2013

• White on White: 2,509 (83.5% of all white-victim murders)
  
• White on Black: 189 (7.6% of all black-victim murders)
  
• Black on Black: 2,245 (90.1% of all black-victim murders)
  
• Black on White: 409 (13.6% of all white-victim murders)

Why is it such a big deal when a white person murders a black person, but not when a black person kills a white person? FFS, it happened twice as much!! Why aren't there "Black Lives Matter" protests when a black person kills another black person? In 2013, There were 3,005 white people murdered, and 2,491 black people murdered.

The reason it seems like it's happening more frequently is because it's being sensationalized to sell more advertising. Headlines are the hook, and blood, murder, and death are mighty hooks (as are anything the Kardashians do).

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Did you trust the Bush administration?

Never trust any politician. I saw my first congressional bribe in 1985. I've seen city councils bought. Any politician will eventually screw you. I voted for Bush for one reason. Two Supreme Court appointments. Other than that he's a typical tax and spend liberal.

Plus Gore was a eco nut.
And Kerry betrayed his fellow servicemen.

I actually think Gore became an Eco nut to make money. I don't believe for a second that he believes what he says. He found, as a politician, that propaganda to useful idiots was valuable politically and just turned it to cash when he got out.

quote:

Gore and Blood, the former chief of Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM), co-founded London-based GIM in 2004. Between 2008 and 2011 the company had raised profits of nearly $218 million from institutions and wealthy investors. By 2008 Gore was able to put $35 million into hedge funds and private partnerships through the Capricorn Investment Group, a Palo Alto company founded by his Canadian billionaire buddy Jeffrey Skoll, the first president of EBay Inc. It was Skoll’s Participant Media that produced Gore’s feverishly frightening 2006 horror film, “An Inconvenient Truth”.