Because Music demanded it

Because Music demanded it (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

BamaD -> Because Music demanded it (10/12/2015 3:51:26 PM)
Ok Music here is your thread. Did you or did you not favor the misnamed "assault weapons" ban.

Musicmystery -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/12/2015 6:57:11 PM)
Looks like a good time. Enjoy yourself!

BamaD -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/12/2015 6:58:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Looks like a good time. Enjoy yourself! Still won't answer a simple question, remember you said you would if I started a thread for it.

MrRodgers -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/12/2015 7:01:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Ok Music here is your thread. Did you or did you not favor the misnamed "assault weapons" ban. What's the beef ? I missed it.

Lucylastic -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/12/2015 7:31:02 PM)
bamas having another hissy fit... nothing to see here, move along please[;)]

lovmuffin -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/12/2015 7:46:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic bamas having another hissy fit... nothing to see here, move along please[;)] Yer just trying to hog all the voyeuristic opportunities to yerself. [8D] I thought you were a sadist.

BamaD -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/12/2015 8:42:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Ok Music here is your thread. Did you or did you not favor the misnamed "assault weapons" ban. What's the beef ? I missed it. In trying to nail him down to a specific answer to a specific question he said he wouldn't answer there and to start another thread if I wanted a simple yes or no answer so I did. As you can see he still won't answer.

BamaD -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/12/2015 8:44:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic bamas having another hissy fit... nothing to see here, move along please[;)] No he said start a new thread if I wanted an answer. He never gives a straight answer to anything so I met his conditions and he still won't answer, I guess he is counting on someone else to protect him.

MrRodgers -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/13/2015 1:23:36 AM)
A ban on assault weapons was passed in 1994 and expired without renewal, in 2004. Two days after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, Senator Dianne Feinstein said she would introduce a new assault weapons ban on the first day of Congress. In 1/2013, Sen. Feinstein introduced S. 150, the "Assault Weapons Ban of 2013." The bill was similar to the 1994 ban, but differed in that it used a one-feature test for a firearm to qualify as an assault weapon rather than the two-feature test of the 1994 ban. In 4/2013, it failed on a Senate vote of 60 to 40. A 60-40 majority mind you but could not override the auto/anonymous filibuster I guess. What of it ?

Lucylastic -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/13/2015 4:16:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic bamas having another hissy fit... nothing to see here, move along please[;)] Yer just trying to hog all the voyeuristic opportunities to yerself. [8D] I thought you were a sadist. you havent seen the end game, and I am...

Lucylastic -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/13/2015 4:21:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic bamas having another hissy fit... nothing to see here, move along please[;)] No he said start a new thread if I wanted an answer. He never gives a straight answer to anything so I met his conditions and he still won't answer, I guess he is counting on someone else to protect him. he needs protection from you? oh please

BamaD -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/13/2015 9:43:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers A ban on assault weapons was passed in 1994 and expired without renewal, in 2004. Two days after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, Senator Dianne Feinstein said she would introduce a new assault weapons ban on the first day of Congress. In 1/2013, Sen. Feinstein introduced S. 150, the "Assault Weapons Ban of 2013." The bill was similar to the 1994 ban, but differed in that it used a one-feature test for a firearm to qualify as an assault weapon rather than the two-feature test of the 1994 ban. In 4/2013, it failed on a Senate vote of 60 to 40. A 60-40 majority mind you but could not override the auto/anonymous filibuster I guess. What of it ? I was trying to get Music to give one straight answer. He said if I wanted one start a thread so I did, as you see he still refuses to answer and is counting on others to defend him.

BamaD -> RE: Because Music demanded it (10/13/2015 9:45:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic bamas having another hissy fit... nothing to see here, move along please[;)] No he said start a new thread if I wanted an answer. He never gives a straight answer to anything so I met his conditions and he still won't answer, I guess he is counting on someone else to protect him. he needs protection from you? oh please Apparently Music, you like doing his heavy lifting for him?

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.602051E-02