RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(Full Version)
All Forums
>>
[Casual Banter]
>>
Humor and Games
Message
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(3/10/2016 8:04:48 AM)
yawning
Yodelling across wide nothingness infers natural gulf.
[sm=banana.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(3/13/2016 4:35:55 AM)
gulf
Ground under long firth.
[sm=alien.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(3/19/2016 5:41:04 PM)
Firth
Fjord in Reykjavík, terribly handy.
[sm=skiprope.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(3/25/2016 6:32:23 AM)
Handy
Has a neat, disciplined yard.
[sm=skiprope.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(3/27/2016 6:06:51 PM)
Yard
Yay, a real drink.
[sm=skiprope.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(4/1/2016 1:11:38 AM)
Drink.
Don't risk imbibing, ninety kelvins.
[sm=shirtysmiley.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(4/3/2016 3:55:07 AM)
kelvins.
Keeping every little vector in neat stasis.
[sm=banana.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(4/7/2016 11:36:19 PM)
Stasis.
Stability takes a seriously intended skill.
[sm=skiprope.gif]
DaddySatyr
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(4/7/2016 11:45:39 PM)
Skill
Sentient Kinetic Implementation Limiting Liability (I haven't done one of these. Is this right?)
Michael
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(4/7/2016 11:58:37 PM)
[sm=champ.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(4/8/2016 12:16:16 AM)
Liability
Locally it augers bad if lawyers involve treaty yarns.
[sm=smiley_bee.gif]
DaddySatyr
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(4/8/2016 12:32:01 AM)
Yarns
Yore Actions Retold Nano Subjectively
Michael
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(4/20/2016 2:39:00 AM)
subjectively
Some ugly bitch just explicitly called Trev indolant, very empathy lacking yenta.
[sm=car.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(5/15/2016 8:11:09 AM)
Yenta.
Yapping excessively not terribly amicable.
[sm=axe.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(7/9/2016 7:54:36 PM)
Amicable.
A man is considered amiable by liking everyone.
[sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(8/1/2016 4:56:28 AM)
everyone
Every verifiable entity registers yearly, only null excluded.
[sm=cactus.gif]
freedomdwarf1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(8/1/2016 5:10:03 AM)
I told ya 6 months ago it was too convoluted.
This must be one of the most b-o-o-r-i-n-g 1-man word games on this site.
56 posts and only 3 people have made an attempt at it - the rest is just you.
So keep playing with yourself. Have a nice day [:D]
ResidentSadist
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(8/1/2016 8:53:08 AM)
convoluted...
Critical overtly negative venomous overdressed lizard using text expressing dissatisfaction (with this game)
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(8/1/2016 9:29:35 AM)
dissatisfaction
Dumbarse interjector sought self agrandisement trolling intellectual speciality, failed abysmally, chump tried it on, nullified.
[sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]
Curmudgeonly1
->
RE: But waduzitmeeean?
(8/17/2016 6:46:44 AM)
nullified
Not usually left limp, in fact, inevitably ended decisively.
[sm=couch.gif]
Page:
<<
< prev
1
2
[3]
4
5
next >
>>
Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Spam Policy
0.2265625