RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


PeonForHer -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 3:54:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick


quote:

ORIGINAL: Snitch

Why do people need each other anyway?

Cause fucking somebody is more fun than fucking yourself.


Yup. That ... and, the odd hug is quite good. I feel a bit old to be using teddy bears any more. I can certainly get by with just my own company for a long, long time, happily enough. But you begin to notice, vaguely, that something relating in some not-quite-discernible way to *another person*, is missing, eventually.

Myself, I miss a woman wittering at me first thing in the morning. Women always witter at one first thing in the morning. It grates; but it grates in a nice way. :-)





respectmen -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 4:24:20 PM)

UllrsIshtar

quote:

Show me a man who will be with a woman if they weren't getting something in return.

Everybody wants something in return for being with somebody. Men generally want different things than women though, but no man on Earth is going to stay with a woman without getting from her whatever it is he wants.


I understand that men and women may want different things. But as I will keep pointing out, when you generally compare what a man wants compared to what a woman wants, its usually the woman with the far bigger sense of entitlement. Yet men are judged more on their sense of entitlement even that it's smaller than the woman's. The woman's is judged less, or not at all, even that its 10 times bigger than the man's. A man usually gets ridiculed in these forums when he appears to feel entitled to just the average woman. Just like the OP. So back to my main point, if you really want genuine equality, the same standard must be applied to all and not one gender being privileged over the other. If you or any other woman don't want that, you and any other woman are being hypocrites each time you/they claim equality in the workplace and other areas in life where men appear to be privileged.

quote:

There is no scrutiny placed on what women have to offer to men? Then why do men ever turn women down at all? You're acting like the only one ever getting rejected are men. There are plenty of women who are interested in men they don't have a chance at getting, because the man isn't interested in them.


Of course men have standards and women get rejected. Women may be under some scrutiny but if you look at what I quoted, my wording, I said "heavy scrutiny". I know I should have worded it and explained it better. My point is that men are under heavy scrutiny while women are not under "heavy" scrutiny as they always have a dozen emails in their inbox and generally get a lot of unwanted attention from men. Women generally get more attention from the opposite gender compared to what men generally get. Why? Because women are judged far less than men.

quote:

Women also aren't expecting the most out of men. They're expecting just as much out of men as men are expecting out of women


You seem like you are contradicting yourself because earlier on you admitted that women generally want to date up. So it's impossible for men to expect just as much as women when its women who are dating up.


quote:

You complain about fat, lazy, average, unemployed women thinking they are all that, and should be able to get a great guy. You're mad that they have expectations that are this high, when you're deeming them pretty low-end yourself. You're mad that they don't deem you good enough to date, and that they're holding out for a better guy than you, because you feel that their expectations of men are unreasonable considering what they have to offer (see... you're wanting something in return just as much as women want something in return for being in the relationship... just like every man wants something in return).

But these women are single. They're not getting the guy they want. Apparently men in general are agreeing with you that these women are expecting very much, and offering very little... and so they're single.

So why do you care? Why do you care that a woman who you deem has very little to offer you isn't interested in you? Why are you even interested in women who you deem have nothing to offer in return for what they want?
Let them expect to much and be single, if that's what they want to do. And if another man likes what they have to offer, and dates them anyways (even though you think she's not offering enough) then what do you care? Let him date her, and deem that what she's offering him is enough. It doesn't impact you now does it? Because you've already decided that what she's offering isn't enough for *you*.

Why are you upset that women who you're not interested in dating, are not interested in you?

Go find women who you are interested in dating, who are offering what you think you as a man deserve, who are paying their fair dues in the relationship and offer to give in return for what they expect out of you.

If a woman isn't offering what you're looking for... why care if she doesn't like you to begin with?


Okay, a few people in here seem to make out that I am mad or I seem to WANT these women who I am complaining about. Firstly, I don't want these women. As I explained in my last post that I don't want anything to do with a chauvinist bigot. I don't want to be with a woman who thinks she is more worthy than my existence simply because she is a woman. If I was to get mad, I would have to "want" these women first. As I don't want these women, I find it hard to feel mad. Instead, I am laughing at these women. As I also explained in my last post, I would rather annoy these types of women than to have any friendly relations with them. I would rather point out the truth about them and call out their bullshit rather than tell them what they want to hear.

So please, you and everyone else, stop giving me these pointless and condescending lectures about why I shouldn't be trying to date these women.

I can get laid and do get laid. I actually had an offer last weekend but I was too fucking lazy. I am not desperate or craving and I am not "needing" women.

A man has these sexist misconceptions placed on him simply because he points out that women may have faults too and men suffer from inequality too. The reason behind this problem alone is that the wrong things women do is a socially taboo subject, just as what inequality men face is a socially taboo subject. Therefore, people feel the need to attack the man for raising these types of discussions due to him committing a social taboo. We have to be politically correct these days or pretty much you aren't being sociable. It's not sociable to place women accountable for things that go wrong in the dating world but its the social norm to blame men for everything.

cindyluvNY

quote:

It seems to me that you are talking about women with good looks. Men and women, with good looks, have more opportunities. They get to pick and choose. And a lot of times they are choosing someone who can better their lives. There are a lot of men and women who aren't that way. They are just looking for friendship and compatibility.


No, I'm talking about everyone, any shape and size, any standard. Yes, it's true that people with good looks have more opportunities. But men get judged more on absolutely everything else other than looks.


quote:

Again, it seems to me you are referring to people who provide a fetish service, and they are in high demand. They can pick and choose.


Last time I checked, the man is also offering fetishes. Why is his offerings less worthy than the woman's? Oh, because its socially acceptable to consider women more worthy than men. If we were to consider men more worthy than women in any area of life, there would be outrage. OMG misogyny, female oppression, patriarchy, chauvinism. When women are considered more worthy = good. When men are consider more worthy = bad.

quote:

When you say "the best out of the bunch" can you describe what that is? What are the qualities this person has?


When women would reject nearly every man on collarspace, they are obviously seeking the best handful on men out of the selection while their own standard on themselves is very questionable.

quote:

My impression is most men want sex in return.


If a woman wants a man, she doesn't? Everyone wants sex unless you're an asexual. That said, wanting sex alone is a far smaller sense of entitlement than the massive laundry list women want out of men.




Snitch -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 5:02:26 PM)

wittering?




Snitch -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 5:07:29 PM)

Wrong thread!




Snitch -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 5:09:33 PM)

Wrong thread.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 5:13:01 PM)

Snitch......................it's a northern English and/or scots term basically meaning ......chattering away about all sorts of things and actually saying little or nothing at all




respectmen -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 5:25:33 PM)

In regards of what's been discussed here, this is an interesting read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3463461/You-given-chance-Hilarious-video-shows-gold-digging-woman-getting-brilliantly-pranked.html




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 5:36:54 PM)

You still banging that worn-out drum, Nick??

You want pussy? You dance to the pussy tune. Period.

Everything else is pretty much irrelevant.
Just accept it and get a life instead of bleating all the fucking time about inequality.




PeonForHer -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 5:38:54 PM)

Yep, wrong thread. [;)]




PeonForHer -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 5:47:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

In regards of what's been discussed here, this is an interesting read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3463461/You-given-chance-Hilarious-video-shows-gold-digging-woman-getting-brilliantly-pranked.html



It probably isn't an interesting read, I'm afraid. The Daily Mail is a right wing, propagandising, arse of a newspaper that's despised by most in the country of its origin, the UK.

You need to avoid such sources if you want your views even to have even the first chance of being respected, respectmen. You need to know *why* such sources aren't respected - and demonstrate that you know why, too.




bounty44 -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 7:24:27 PM)

"Why is the left obsessed by the Daily Mail?"

quote:

...No, our crime is more heinous than that.

It is that the Mail constantly dares to stand up to the liberal-left consensus that dominates so many areas of British life and instead represents the views of the ordinary people who are our readers and who don't have a voice in today's political landscape and are too often ignored by today's ruling elite.

The metropolitan classes, of course, despise our readers with their dreams (mostly unfulfilled) of a decent education and health service they can trust, their belief in the family, patriotism, self-reliance, and their over-riding suspicion of the state and the People Who Know Best.

These people mock our readers' scepticism over the European Union and a human rights court that seems to care more about the criminal than the victim. They scoff at our readers who, while tolerant, fret that the country's schools and hospitals can't cope with mass immigration.

In other words, these people sneer at the decent working Britons – I'd argue they are the backbone of this country – they constantly profess to be concerned about.

The truth is that there is an unpleasant intellectual snobbery about the Mail in leftish circles, for whom the word 'suburban' is an obscenity.

They simply cannot comprehend how a paper that opposes the mindset they hold dear can be so successful and so loved by its millions of readers.


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/12/left-daily-mail-paul-dacre

quote:

...the Daily Mail is a hugely successful newspaper, with a circulation of nearly 2 million at a time when most of the print media is struggling to make a profit. Its website is one of the most read news sites in the world with a staggering 9 million daily browsers last month. The paper is often seen as a barometer for the sentiments of middle England...


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/04/daily-mail-ralph-miliband

quote:

...The paper sells an average of 1.5 million copies on weekdays, 2.4 million on Saturdays. Only the Sun sells more but, on Saturdays, the Mail has just moved ahead. Its 4.3 million daily readers include more from the top three social classes (A, B and C1) than the Times, Guardian, Independent and Financial Times combined...

Under Dacre, the Mail has won Newspaper of the Year six times in the annual British Press Awards – twice as many prizes as any other paper.

Everyone who has ever worked for Dacre, who has just passed his 65th birthday, praises his almost uncanny instinct for the issues and stories that will hold the attention of “Middle England”...

“He articulates the dreams, fears and hopes of socially insecure members of the suburban middle class,” says Peter Oborne, the Mail’s former political columnist now at the Daily Telegraph. “It’s a daily performance of genius.”

His enemies see the Mail, to quote the Huffington Post writer and NS columnist Mehdi Hasan (who was duly monstered in the Mail’s pages), as “immigrant-bashing, woman-hating, Muslim-smearing, NHS-undermining, gay-baiting”.

[in other words, typical liberal response]

The loathing is returned, with interest. In Dacre’s mind, the country is run, in effect, by affluent metropolitan liberals who dominate Whitehall, the leadership of the main political parties, the universities, the BBC and most public-sector professions.

The Mail, in his view, speaks for ordinary people, working hard and struggling with their bills, conventional in their views, ambitious for their children, loyal to their country, proud of owning their home, determined to stand on their own feet. These people, Dacre believes, are not given a fair hearing in the national media and the Mail alone fights for them. It is incomprehensible to him – a gross category error – that critics should be obsessed by the Mail’s power and influence when the BBC, funded by a compulsory poll tax, dominates the news market. It uses this position, he argues, to push a dogmatically liberal agenda, hidden behind supposed neutrality. Scarcely an issue of the Mail passes without a snipe and sometimes a full barrage in the news pages, leaders or signed opinion columns at BBC “bias”.


http://www.newstatesman.com/media/2013/12/man-who-hates-liberal-britain






OsideGirl -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/26/2016 10:55:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick


quote:

ORIGINAL: Snitch

Why do people need each other anyway?

Cause fucking somebody is more fun than fucking yourself.


Yup. That ... and, the odd hug is quite good. I feel a bit old to be using teddy bears any more. I can certainly get by with just my own company for a long, long time, happily enough. But you begin to notice, vaguely, that something relating in some not-quite-discernible way to *another person*, is missing, eventually.

Myself, I miss a woman wittering at me first thing in the morning. Women always witter at one first thing in the morning. It grates; but it grates in a nice way. :-)



Actually for ( at the very least) 30 minutes, I'm just waking up and I'm not coherent enough to "witter". I prefer to snuggle and enjoy my coffee until I'm fully awake.




Lucylastic -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/27/2016 12:08:52 AM)

Anything I say before I have my coffeee is not to be used as evidence against me, altho I prefer an early morning snuggle or nookie is much better way to start the day.




pleasnpetrichor -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/27/2016 12:53:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

You still banging that worn-out drum, Nick??

You want pussy? You dance to the pussy tune. Period.

Everything else is pretty much irrelevant.
Just accept it and get a life instead of bleating all the fucking time about inequality.


I feel rather unqualified to debate this, but in all conscience I can't let it go.

Look at what you just wrote.

Why should anyone "just accept" crap that they believe is genuinely unfair? To get laid? Because it's easier that way? Courage, in my opinion, is standing up and being counted.

I did some digging into this men's rights stuff a while back. I was absolutely embarassed to discover the depth of my own ignorance and prejudice. I'll give you this: Nick's a troll, and a piss poor representative of the MRA. But I think it would be a mistake to use him as an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

It's easy to take these cheap shots at Nick. (I've taken a number myself at Nick as well as others who did not deserve it.) But talking down to someone from a position of ignorance only serves to make a person look stupid. I think it would be a good idea to look more deeply into these ideas before you make fun of them, or Nick, any further.

That... and maybe look at your signature line.

Having said that, I'll admit it was a pretty dumb topic for a thread.





respectmen -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/27/2016 1:12:00 AM)

pleasnpetrichor

Thanks for providing a far better post compared to the others in here. However, I'm not an MRA. I consider myself to be an egalitarian. I'm on the right, I don't believe in most leftist thinking.





DaddySatyr -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/27/2016 2:27:12 AM)


Here is the fly in the ointment about which I share, frequently:

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

... You want pussy? You dance to the pussy tune. Period.



I honestly don't know if you identify as dominant or not so what I am saying is not really directed at you, but you have voiced the tenor of what I feel is the pervasive feeling here.

That statement (to me) is not one that a dominant would make. Abject submission just for the sake of sex? That's not how it works in my house or my world.

One of the things that drew me to this lifestyle was the disgust I felt when I witnessed friends and acquaintances that would acquiesce to things that they had said were abhorrent to them because "she's hot, dude!". To my mind, it's a recipe for disaster.

If a person puts too many of their own desires to the side just because of some sex (or, even just so they don't have to be alone), eventually resentment will grow and raise its ugly head.

Many times I have said that because of my past, if I never get laid again, I've had my fair share and that's true. It's also what keeps me from "dancing to the pussy tune" as you so eloquently put it. Have I spent a lot of time in my life without a romantic partner? Sure, but the partnerships I have had since I adopted this stance have been much more satisfying.

If you're doubting me, change the genders. If a submissive female had made the original post, would your advice have been: "if you want a man to control and take care of you, you have to 'pay the price of submission'"? We hardly hear that around here and that is the point I was trying to make.

Let others "dance to the pussy tune." I'll just cuddle up with my ladies and laugh at the "dominants" that dance that jig.



Michael




PeonForHer -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/27/2016 2:55:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"Why is the left obsessed by the Daily Mail?"



Because it's crap.




dreamlady -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/27/2016 3:12:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

I can get laid and do get laid. I actually had an offer last weekend but I was too fucking lazy. I am not desperate or craving and I am not "needing" women.
<snip>
Everyone wants sex unless you're an asexual. That said, wanting sex alone is a far smaller sense of entitlement than the massive laundry list women want out of men.

Aha, so you do want something more than *just* getting laid or else you wouldn't have felt too lazy to be bothered with spiffying yourself up and tidying up your quarters. How is it that when a woman wants something more than *just* getting laid, she's being unreasonable, and yet you aren't.
Obviously, you weren't into this woman, either didn't want to host her by ordering in pizza, or didn't feel it was worth your while to make the drive over to her place.

Okay r-men, I'll admit that it's easy to yank your chain.
(Much in the same way that OP's hypocritical crusade to make the world a better place by getting overweight women physically fit is his glaring Achilles Heel. Hypocritical, not due to his lack of fitness [nor is he all that in the looks dept. either], but because he says one thing out here on the Message Boards which makes him come across as being a whacked-out sort of chubby chaser, but then in his profile, he says he's seeking submissive women who are already physically fit, strong and into bodybuilding. [8|] )

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that you didn't want what was too easily obtained. See how that works? You can rail on and on against human nature, but your protests are fundamentally in vain.

DS posted he's had more than his lifetime quota (fair share) of pussy getting thrown his way in so many words, not uncommon with musicians and groupies. Turns out, a carousel of easily obtained casual sex wasn't enough for him, he wanted more out of life and from his intimate partnerships.

You are pretty much saying that life isn't fair. That's true, it isn't. We're all in that same boat, but this is the part that you don't get. People are going to want what they want. There are men who want a busty young blonde for arm candy. That wouldn't be me. So what. Chances are, I wouldn't want them either. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it, for Christ's sake, or accuse these men of being sexist pigs because their sexual preferences don't match up with mine or because I'm not the *right* type of "trophy wife" that they feel they're entitled to have.


DreamLady




LadyPact -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/27/2016 5:19:31 AM)

I'm still working on the caffeine, too, so hang with me. We were at the club last night and I'm still waking up. (Game night is a serious blast and I mention that for a very specific reason.)
quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

cindyluvNY

quote:

It seems to me that you are talking about women with good looks. Men and women, with good looks, have more opportunities. They get to pick and choose. And a lot of times they are choosing someone who can better their lives. There are a lot of men and women who aren't that way. They are just looking for friendship and compatibility.


No, I'm talking about everyone, any shape and size, any standard. Yes, it's true that people with good looks have more opportunities. But men get judged more on absolutely everything else other than looks.

Still on the kink site, right? I get that most folks interpose that with being the dating site. For those monogamous people who only kink with the person with whom they are in the relationship with, this won't apply but there are a section of people here for whom it does. There are people on this site who enjoy topping/bottoming, so this is directed more in that category.

If you include the folks who are here for the BDSM play, and good looks is your criteria for that, it's probably one of the stupidest things going. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, because it does. I've walked into plenty of clubs over the years and been able to do pick up play solely on the fact that I'm female and happen to own toys. If I was a bottom, there is no way in hell I'd be approaching play like that. You'd better care a whole lot more about a top's competency level than what they look like.


quote:

Again, it seems to me you are referring to people who provide a fetish service, and they are in high demand. They can pick and choose.


quote:

Last time I checked, the man is also offering fetishes. Why is his offerings less worthy than the woman's? Oh, because its socially acceptable to consider women more worthy than men. If we were to consider men more worthy than women in any area of life, there would be outrage. OMG misogyny, female oppression, patriarchy, chauvinism. When women are considered more worthy = good. When men are consider more worthy = bad.

Which end are the "fetishes" coming from? Aakasha's got the thread about what she seeks (vulnerability/responses from the bottom) that she's rolled out at least a half a dozen times over the years from various angles, and you know, I actually agree with her that how a bottom feeds back during play is what makes the whole thing fun and worth doing in the first place. Fantastic from the bottom side. On the other hand, (some) tops invest a heck of a lot of time a) learning what they are doing and b) practicing it. If a bottom blows it because they are boring, all I lose is an hour of my life because they weren't fun to play with. If you're a bottom and I suck as a top, the stakes can be way higher. I'm not trying to fear monger. However, it is something to think about.

quote:

When you say "the best out of the bunch" can you describe what that is? What are the qualities this person has?


quote:

When women would reject nearly every man on collarspace, they are obviously seeking the best handful on men out of the selection while their own standard on themselves is very questionable.

Keep in mind, earlier in the thread, I mentioned the difference about my preferred method being Fet, rather than CM. My 'delete unread' process is way higher here than it is on the other site. Even on the other site, a person is going to get farther contacting me about play if they know somebody that I know. Of the three emails that I got yesterday about hitting up on game night, one of them I discounted entirely because the person couldn't pass my criteria. It wasn't that the email wasn't nice enough, that the guy was rude, or anything like that. He just plain didn't know anybody that I personally know. These days, that's one of my standards.

quote:

My impression is most men want sex in return.


quote:

If a woman wants a man, she doesn't? Everyone wants sex unless you're an asexual. That said, wanting sex alone is a far smaller sense of entitlement than the massive laundry list women want out of men.

Here's an area where I think you are wrong. I wouldn't care if I looked like Jabba the Hut. I could, absolutely, still get laid. However, not everyone wants sex just cause, hey, sex is available. (You said that in your own post, so you should know this.) There's a lot of territory for some between asexual and f^ck everything that moves.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining (2/27/2016 6:27:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pleasnpetrichor

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

You still banging that worn-out drum, Nick??

You want pussy? You dance to the pussy tune. Period.

Everything else is pretty much irrelevant.
Just accept it and get a life instead of bleating all the fucking time about inequality.


I feel rather unqualified to debate this, but in all conscience I can't let it go.

Look at what you just wrote.

Why should anyone "just accept" crap that they believe is genuinely unfair? To get laid? Because it's easier that way? Courage, in my opinion, is standing up and being counted.

I did some digging into this men's rights stuff a while back. I was absolutely embarassed to discover the depth of my own ignorance and prejudice. I'll give you this: Nick's a troll, and a piss poor representative of the MRA. But I think it would be a mistake to use him as an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

It's easy to take these cheap shots at Nick. (I've taken a number myself at Nick as well as others who did not deserve it.) But talking down to someone from a position of ignorance only serves to make a person look stupid. I think it would be a good idea to look more deeply into these ideas before you make fun of them, or Nick, any further.

That... and maybe look at your signature line.

Having said that, I'll admit it was a pretty dumb topic for a thread.



I have looked at the topic at quite an in-depth level.
I honestly and sincerely don't believe that men get a hard time with what very few disadvantages we suffer compared to the majority of women in the world.

Nick was a well-known troll long before I joined the forums and has always bleated ad-nauseum about a tiny handful of things that he believes men suffer as an injustice.
He never considers things from a woman's PoV.
And he's been consistently beating this particular drum ever since I've been here.

It's always the same old tired broken record every time.
Nothing new; always the same old shit every time.
After a few years you really get miffed at seeing it at every turn of the scroller.
He doesn't let up.
He never speaks on other subjects - always this one and only topic.

A sniveling, whining, piss-poor excuse of a man that has this brow-beaten myopic attitude that makes a really bad impression of men in general.

Life isn't perfect. We all know that.
But really?? This incessant bleating on one minuscule subject is tiring.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375