LadyPact -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (4/2/2016 10:53:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2 quote:
ORIGINAL: LilJuly76 I'm certainly glad the long term folk can tell the bad seeds, this imperial dude, I have no clue his method to his madness but he needs some mental help. Here's a different point of view (mine). I think it is possible that ImperialPath is someone having a very bad time in his life, maybe lashing out some, but not the evil asshole people think he is. I also quite liked Arturas, whose posts I often found tongue-in-cheek and made with a twinkle in his eye, though the vast majority here took everything he said as literal. He often made me laugh. Arturas is ImperialPath, judging from the fact that the latter posted a profile picture of the former on his profile. Arturas, I hope all is soon better for you. Well, I went and looked again. The person who was trying to lecture me on "honor" is no longer 34 and is now 99. I was unable to see more than the main pic, so I won't say anything about the female photos on the profile. I never thought Artie was Middle Eastern or any of that other stuff. Just to be clear, it was not my intention to imply that Artie was a bad seed. Pompous ass? Yes. Dishonest? Yes. Intentionally out to harm people? No. I will say this. On principle alone, I don't have to like Artie to stand on his side for a legitimate reason to take on a new profile name. If he's been stalked, harassed, outed, somebody trying to use his kinks against him in his vanilla life, somebody trying to screw with his UM's custody matters, threaten him in some way... Any of that stuff? I don't have to like him to know that shouldn't be happening. However, if he IS the stalker, harasser, outer, consent violator, threaten-er, or any of that crap? I'm pretty sure we'll have a problem. Oh, and if it IS Artie, I'm till up for that single tail challenge. Bring your cup.
|
|
|
|