RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:25:02 AM)

yeh lots of atheists have become militant against theists in attempts to establish their own flavor of religious supremacy.




vincentML -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:26:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

HAHHAHAHHAHA
FR

yep christianity has zero blood on their hands.
Not today, not even fifty years ago...
its all in the crusades.
BTW communism isnt a belief in atheism.
Not to mention atheism isnt a belief in communism
No matter how you try to conflate it. spin it and lie about it.





and atheists have over 100 million on their hands, most would choose to live with the one who is least likely to kill them.


Well shit! Why don't you simply burn us atheists (hiss, boo) at the stake like in the good old days? Or you could lynch us from a tree limb like the Khristian Klux Klan did to coloreds in the southland. Ah, those were the days. Warm the heart of Dixie's boys and girls. But unfortunately for you now in contemporary times you are reduced to refusing to bake cakes for those who offend your religious sensibilities. Pathetic. [8|]




vincentML -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:28:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yeh lots of atheists have become militant against theists in attempts to establish their own flavor of religious supremacy.

What acts of militancy are you conjuring, Rev?




Awareness -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:29:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


While that is certainly true, they are trying to get the country to believe that all republicans are homophobic and should never hold office. How can you build that kind of hate with only a cake. No, you have to make it far worse than it is to generate the kind of hate the left seems to be going for these days and they have made it clear they don't mind lying to get their point across. And in the mean time we should boycott all business in the states because although it was the law makers who passed the bills they somehow think it's the average citizen who should pay for it. And if they continue to scream boycott every time someone passes a bill they don't like, they can scare people into voting for who they want in the next election.


God, THB. The first time you put in an appearance on this thread and it's to defend republicans, not other LGBT people? I suppose I should be used to your MO by now, but sometimes you still astonish me.
Ye Gods, what a tragically unsophisticated mind you possess. Word of advice Peon, don't lecture other people on fucking anything. Your own worldview is incapable of apprehending complexity. Your response to THB reveals the tragically limited paradigm under which you operate. The world is divided into two tribes, and those who are not for you are against you. You really do think that an individual's views should be defined by the social group they're nominally a part of. That's an astoundingly primitive mode of thought.

And you taught political science? What an astonishing mismatch between competence and capability.




Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:34:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

@RO

quote:

FAIL!

I can save you some time, but no where in law will you find a contractual stipulation defined as a 'grant' FROM the gubblemint with respect to the BoR.

It is an 'ACKNOWLEDGED' of rights by the crookocracy what the crookocracy will not violate or infringe.

In the case of the constitution the crookocracy both recognized and agreed by stipulation (so they could exist) to the reservation of rights, which are not UNDER the laws of the unoted states but set aside from the laws of the united states since it has no jurisdiction over religion, speech, and arms etc.

That might be a thoughtful argument (hard to say, however) from the perspective of your sovereign citizen wet dream.

quote:

Hence DEMOCRACY IS IN VIOLATION of our rights when it uses ITS mob pressure, LEGISLATION, COURT DECISIONS, CITIES or MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS to stomp the rights of individuals


Right! Call out the Michigan militia then. Where the fuck is Paul Revere when we really need him, that slacker.



I do love it when you all have to dance because you have nothing to fight back with but a bag of hot air.




Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:37:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

HAHHAHAHHAHA
FR

yep christianity has zero blood on their hands.
Not today, not even fifty years ago...
its all in the crusades.
BTW communism isnt a belief in atheism.
Not to mention atheism isnt a belief in communism
No matter how you try to conflate it. spin it and lie about it.





and atheists have over 100 million on their hands, most would choose to live with the one who is least likely to kill them.


Well shit! Why don't you simply burn us atheists (hiss, boo) at the stake like in the good old days? Or you could lynch us from a tree limb like the Khristian Klux Klan did to coloreds in the southland. Ah, those were the days. Warm the heart of Dixie's boys and girls. But unfortunately for you now in contemporary times you are reduced to refusing to bake cakes for those who offend your religious sensibilities. Pathetic. [8|]




why not simply elect another stalin and he can line you all up and simply shoot you, atheists supporting atheists. Millions strong! (in the grave that is) [8|]




Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:40:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yeh lots of atheists have become militant against theists in attempts to establish their own flavor of religious supremacy.

What acts of militancy are you conjuring, Rev?





well they successfully executed a coup against the american people.




ifmaz -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:41:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

By walking in and trying to buy something?

Why put the burden of attempting to make a purchase and going through an unpleasant rejection based on an immutable part of their identity on the customers when a sign could have communicated the point right from the start, alerting the would-be buyers to walk on?


So you want legislation based on feelings?

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
quote:

Lets assume the example of a cake maker. A couple enters and wants to buy a rather expensive cake. The baker must decide if their religious convictions outweigh their desire to keep the lights on. Now imagine gay couples lined up around the block to enter this baker's shop, all wanting to buy expensive cakes. A fairly loud message, yes? Perhaps a person, seeing the sudden need for an all-inclusive bakery, opens their own bakery and caters to everyone. Do you think those gay couples who all want expensive cakes (or any baked good) would patron the religious bakery? Do you think friends of the gay couples would?

Did the government need to become involved or did the free market work as expected?

Emphasis mine. Let me know when this actually happens in real life.


So your argument comes down to being too lazy to have a peaceful demonstration/boycott, instead wanting Big Daddy Government to force people?




Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:46:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

@DaddySatyr,

There is no difference - provided the choices are available. As DC and others have mentioned, the options are limited in poor and rural areas. What happens then, when there are no available gay or BDSM or D/s friendly therapist to be referred to? Is that therapist then required to grudgingly treat the patient?


You seem to be arguing out of both sides of your mouth.

Do you want the counselor to be forced to counsel the patient? Wait! let's turn that around: Do you want to subject a gay person to be counseled by someone who can't really help them? Do you want the law to force counselors to "smile and wave" and hide their true feelings while counseling that gay person?

Do you think that someone who thinks that the crux of a person's problem is their sexual identity will find some way to help that person that doesn't amount to (what did they used to call it? Where Christian groups forced "straight counseling" on gays?) making them straight? "There you go, now you are attracted to the opposite gender! Problems solved!"


The law mandates that the therapist MUST COORDINATE a referral to a more compassionate therapist. No one's going without therapy and the onus is on the Christian therapist to find a new therapist for the client.

Do you think forcing that therapist to give some sort of half-hearted counseling is going to benefit the client?

I think you should try to float that law that a counselor should be forced to treat someone that they believe can only be truly "cured" by becoming "straight". I'll bet the LGBT community will line up to thank you for it.







BINGO!

and this: "The law mandates that the therapist MUST COORDINATE a referral to a more compassionate therapist." is absolute bullshit!

Lets start with the gubblemint, they should have the same requirements, that will be repealed before the fucking ink is dry.






Lucylastic -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:51:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

It's seriously pathetic to try to swing it all around so that you now claim that it's such 'Christians' are being persecuted.

Cloaking bigotry in "religion" doesnt make it any less bigoted.
Oh and calling people out on their bigotry isnt persecution, its accountability...


I agree. Nor is cloaking bigotry in political correctness.

If you had a clue, you would see that what your friends are doing is is ignoring EQUAL human rights. and persecution of non christians.
Not having your ears offended by consequences of your hatefut rhetoric and ignorance.
Bigotry/hate/fear is now wanting and making sure people have the same rights as everyone else???????LMAO FUck me sideways, that isnt anywhere close to political correctness either.






Actually, I don't think you know who my friends are or what they believe. So, that's a pretty bigoted post by you. Which, pretty much proves my point. Anyone who doesn't kowtow to you is a bigot. You won't listen to different views. We must just all follow your party line and say the words required to be said. That is politically correct bigotry.

Your opinions speak for themselves. No I dont know who you are, new poster, who thinks his words carry any weight with me...they dont. Thats not bigotry. Thats knowing socks are mostly fake.

Until you can prove you can be believed, I trust your words and your ahem, arguments to be facile and woprthless. Of course you are entitled to do the same. But if you see bigotry in my post...maybe you can understand why others, wether they be straight, female or gay /lesbian christian, jewish, muslim, atheist or agnostic, could take your views as being worse than bigoted. You are offended? take a number.






vincentML -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:51:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yeh lots of atheists have become militant against theists in attempts to establish their own flavor of religious supremacy.

What acts of militancy are you conjuring, Rev?





well they successfully executed a coup against the american people.

Atheists did that? [sm=rofl.gif] Fuck! I never got the memo. Your ideas are hilariously stupid sometimes. [sm=rofl.gif]




Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 11:57:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yeh lots of atheists have become militant against theists in attempts to establish their own flavor of religious supremacy.

What acts of militancy are you conjuring, Rev?





well they successfully executed a coup against the american people.

Atheists did that? [sm=rofl.gif] Fuck! I never got the memo. Your ideas are hilariously stupid sometimes. [sm=rofl.gif]



case in point:

the kliens right to exercise their religion was violated by the atheist infiltrated gubblemint.

Hell even the state constitutions have been modified to be fraudulent with regard to what they agreed upon in the federal constitution.







DaddySatyr -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 12:00:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

I'm not arguing for either sides of the extremes.



Of course you're not. Then, who was it that typed this:

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

Considering there have been so many crimes against humanity done in the name of religion; The Crusades among them, I'm finding a bit of sad irony that you feel the same is happening or will/could happen to those of the Christian Faith. Or extremely concerned that you might be implying you think there should be a return of The Crusades to punish the sinners or as some faiths call them, infidels.

?

Was someone else sitting at your keyboard while you were on your anti-religion soap box?


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

When I ask a question, I'm not trying to further any sides argument. I'm trying to understand them.



Oh! You're trying to understand the issues? you mean, like, when you posted this:

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

Then again, the gay in question could seek therapy from someone who is a less discriminatory, judge mental, holier than though jackass.



Yeah, that doesn't sound like someone that already has their mind made up. I apologize. I mistook your neutrality in that statement for hateful vitriol, aimed at people of faith.

Another example would be:


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

At the same time, I do find myself baffled and distressed by the evidence of hatred and bigotry that I see expressed.



Of course you do, seeing as how you're one of the purveyors of it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

To answer your question, no I would not want a counselor to be forced to treat someone they despise nor should someone have to endure treatment from a coouncelor that despises them for living true to their own nature.

Which brings us back full circle to what I'm trying to understand in the first place...

Both sides to this issue.



There's that staunch neutrality, again [:D] You're doe-eyed routine is failing.






Lucylastic -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 12:14:35 PM)


Oh fuck, the irony

[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/colllar/fumississipi.jpg[/image]




ifmaz -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 12:15:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yeh lots of atheists have become militant against theists in attempts to establish their own flavor of religious supremacy.

What acts of militancy are you conjuring, Rev?





well they successfully executed a coup against the american people.

Atheists did that? [sm=rofl.gif] Fuck! I never got the memo. Your ideas are hilariously stupid sometimes. [sm=rofl.gif]


This must be why atheists are forbidden from holding office in 7 states. Successful coup indeed.




ifmaz -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 12:18:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


Oh fuck, the irony

[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/colllar/fumississipi.jpg[/image]


That situation has several questions, the largest of which is why government involved itself in marriage to begin with.




Lucylastic -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 12:22:17 PM)

Every civilized country has government involved in marriage.
WHy are so many republicans governments so intent on putting themselves in charge of womens bodies?





Nnanji -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 12:22:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

It's seriously pathetic to try to swing it all around so that you now claim that it's such 'Christians' are being persecuted.

Cloaking bigotry in "religion" doesnt make it any less bigoted.
Oh and calling people out on their bigotry isnt persecution, its accountability...


I agree. Nor is cloaking bigotry in political correctness.

If you had a clue, you would see that what your friends are doing is is ignoring EQUAL human rights. and persecution of non christians.
Not having your ears offended by consequences of your hatefut rhetoric and ignorance.
Bigotry/hate/fear is now wanting and making sure people have the same rights as everyone else???????LMAO FUck me sideways, that isnt anywhere close to political correctness either.






Actually, I don't think you know who my friends are or what they believe. So, that's a pretty bigoted post by you. Which, pretty much proves my point. Anyone who doesn't kowtow to you is a bigot. You won't listen to different views. We must just all follow your party line and say the words required to be said. That is politically correct bigotry.

Your opinions speak for themselves. No I dont know who you are, new poster, who thinks his words carry any weight with me...they dont. Thats not bigotry. Thats knowing socks are mostly fake.

Until you can prove you can be believed, I trust your words and your ahem, arguments to be facile and woprthless. Of course you are entitled to do the same. But if you see bigotry in my post...maybe you can understand why others, wether they be straight, female or gay /lesbian christian, jewish, muslim, atheist or agnostic, could take your views as being worse than bigoted. You are offended? take a number.





Really? I agreed with you and added a small point from the other side. That seems to set you off. How interesting. There seems to be lots of hate and anger there. Yet, you don't offend me. You would have to mean something to me to offend me. I just assumed this was a discussion, not a kowtow to your views, site.




Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 12:26:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Every civilized country has government involved in marriage.
WHy are so many republicans governments so intent on putting themselves in charge of womens bodies?





so you admit the gubblemint breached the rights of the people in the private affairs.




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 12:26:36 PM)

DS,

Taking my comments out of context is not serving any purpose. Neither is answering your questions directly, as you appear to desire confrontational opposition. You have plenty with whom to do this with on the boards. Since you have already stated earlier you are done with me, I'm going to take you at your word and wish you well. No harm, no foul.

In case I have not been clear on my stance, I have stated openly that I would not personally wish to put someone in the position of doing something that went against their beliefs. I would shop elsewhere. As has been pointed out, not everyone has the option of shopping elsewhere. This opens the debate around what if scenarios. Which has anyone, who wants to try and understand both sides of this debate asking questions. Which I have.

Yes, I have a personal distaste for bigotry and oppression. I really don't care if it is clothed in PC or religious dogma.
My desire is to determine how the options play out.

At any rate, I will concede the point that I'm really not suited to this type of discussion. I find it rather distastefu.

Charlotte




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.785156E-02