RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Phydeaux -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (4/29/2016 3:30:52 PM)

4 assumptions. Pay attention to what is clearly stated.




bounty44 -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (4/29/2016 3:38:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

snark doesn't really erase the intellectual integrity argument of that you really still need to address the content.

Bless your heart.

I made substantive points in post 173, and the response was a strawman attempt at mind-reading. Not wasting any more time/energy on that.

As for not living up to the "intellectual integrity" of Newsmax and its fans, well, that's a cross I'll just have to bear.


yes but your comments had nothing "substantive" to do with the actual material IN the article. you generally denigrated the source, the author and the judge in question without giving an actual critique. that's what im referring to when I say the "intellectual integrity argument"---dealing with the content.

and I suspect that's why phydeaux, and myself as I was reading what you had written, were looking for.




mnottertail -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (4/29/2016 4:57:30 PM)

Mirabile dictu, you got one I can almost agree with, other than I do think that the state has a reasonable interest in what dark money comes in (and its ancillary realities), and whether it meets the Federal and State Law. (and I am sad that they have policy-ed (thats right, policy-ed) a watering down of the actual law) under that watering down, and based on the 'leaking' of names it doesn't seem like its kosher for passover.




mnottertail -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (4/29/2016 4:59:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

snark doesn't really erase the intellectual integrity argument of that you really still need to address the content.

Bless your heart.

I made substantive points in post 173, and the response was a strawman attempt at mind-reading. Not wasting any more time/energy on that.

As for not living up to the "intellectual integrity" of Newsmax and its fans, well, that's a cross I'll just have to bear.


yes but your comments had nothing "substantive" to do with the actual material IN the article. you generally denigrated the source, the author and the judge in question without giving an actual critique. that's what im referring to when I say the "intellectual integrity argument"---dealing with the content.

and I suspect that's why phydeaux, and myself as I was reading what you had written, were looking for.


One does not need an actual critique, any apologist can come up here and say any horseshit they want, doesn't make it factual, topical, or worthy of honest consideration.




Phydeaux -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/3/2016 10:05:50 PM)



Nor is it merely classroom instruction that leftists tend to control. Liberal faculty and college administrators also closely monitor outside speakers invited to campus. The message conveyed to students is that people who challenge liberal dogma are not very welcome. A 2010 report by the Association of American Colleges and Universities found that only 40% of college freshman “strongly agreed that it is safe to hold unpopular positions on campus” and that by senior year it’s down to 30%.

In other words - leftists are intolerant.




mnottertail -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/4/2016 7:13:45 AM)

Yeah, I recall when Anton LaVey did his speaking tour at Notre Dame, Brigham Young, and Liberty University, don't you?





ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/4/2016 10:51:46 AM)

quote:

In other words - leftists are intolerant.

Yes they are increasingly so, and it is a big problem. However, in general intolerance is growing all across the political spectrum.




PeonForHer -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/5/2016 3:17:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

In other words - leftists are intolerant.

Yes they are increasingly so, and it is a big problem. However, in general intolerance is growing all across the political spectrum.


If only people were just as intolerant of governments that keep screwing them over.




bounty44 -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/5/2016 3:42:43 PM)

"Shocker: Liberal Graduation Speakers Outnumber Conservatives 4-to-1"

quote:

Liberal bias? What liberal bias?

According to Campus Reform, out of the top 100 universities, 40 of them are featuring explicitly liberal speakers at their commencement ceremonies. Only 10 are hosting speakers who are either openly conservative or who have donated to conservative/Republican politicians....

Notably, not a single active conservative politician was invited to speak at one of the nation’s top schools. However, seven active members of President Obama’s administration will deliver commencement addresses this year, including Obama himself, who will speak to three graduating classes.

It's no wonder why colleges are churning out special snowflakes who are completely unprepared for the real world.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2016/05/05/shocker-liberal-graduation-speakers-outnumber-conservatives-4to1-n2158608




mnottertail -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/5/2016 4:52:15 PM)

No shocker, the liberals are usually educated. The nutsuckers are usually busy trying to explain how words dont mean what they mean and there are facts that support biblical creationism.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/5/2016 6:01:48 PM)

quote:

According to Campus Reform, out of the top 100 universities, 40 of them are featuring explicitly liberal speakers at their commencement ceremonies. Only 10 are hosting speakers who are either openly conservative or who have donated to conservative/Republican politicians....

So?




Nnanji -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 8:52:19 AM)

http://nypost.com/2016/05/05/playing-the-press-and-the-public-for-chumps-to-sell-the-iran-deal/





Lucylastic -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 8:58:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"Shocker: Liberal Graduation Speakers Outnumber Conservatives 4-to-1"

quote:

Liberal bias? What liberal bias?

According to Campus Reform, out of the top 100 universities, 40 of them are featuring explicitly liberal speakers at their commencement ceremonies. Only 10 are hosting speakers who are either openly conservative or who have donated to conservative/Republican politicians....

Notably, not a single active conservative politician was invited to speak at one of the nation’s top schools. However, seven active members of President Obama’s administration will deliver commencement addresses this year, including Obama himself, who will speak to three graduating classes.

It's no wonder why colleges are churning out special snowflakes who are completely unprepared for the real world.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2016/05/05/shocker-liberal-graduation-speakers-outnumber-conservatives-4to1-n2158608


maybe cons just dont get to graduate so much




WhoreMods -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 10:03:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
maybe cons just dont get to graduate so much

That'll be the liberal bias in the education system's fault, no doubt.
[:D]




Lucylastic -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 10:18:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
maybe cons just dont get to graduate so much

That'll be the liberal bias in the education system's fault, no doubt.
[:D]

without a doubt




WhoreMods -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 10:22:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
maybe cons just dont get to graduate so much

That'll be the liberal bias in the education system's fault, no doubt.
[:D]

without a doubt

There'e no other possible explanation, is there? Everybody knows that conservatives are waaay smarter than liberals. Just look at how ingenious and inventive the excuses they've spent the last few months coming up with for an asshole that combs over its butthair...




Phydeaux -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 12:57:54 PM)

More suggested reading for ... liberals

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/05/06/our_polarized_politics_are_tied_to_flaws_in_education_130488.html




WhoreMods -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 1:01:24 PM)

I love the u-turn in the last paragraph. Evidently the right has decided that flip-flopping is no longer a bad thing.




mnottertail -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 1:06:19 PM)

Why would liberals read such vacuous rancid asswipe as that?




Phydeaux -> RE: Suggested reading for all liberals (5/6/2016 1:17:34 PM)

Uh huh. So specifically what part did you find rancid?




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 10 [11] 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875