Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the bird.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the bird. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/1/2016 1:13:59 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Of course socialism is central to the issue. Endemic to socialist nations is the promising of social benefits, and the idea of rejiggering society to be more 'fair'.

...


which was exactly what was done by the imperialist conservative Reichskanzler Bismarck as part of his anti-socialist laws in the 1880s

Social security, state pensions, health insurance, invalidity insurance

this was conservative politics of the 19th century





The reason the law is called "anti-socialist" was to undercut rising support for socialism in Germany.
Dawson says Bismark sought to preserve the existing economic order in Germany, whereas the socialist sought to subvert the state and replace the capitalist order with a socialist one.

I suppose I do not really get the point of your argument. No one has said that social safety nets are not a good thing. That doesn't change that they are socialistic.

The fact that Bismark sought to introduce some social reforms is not really questioned. Nor is the fact that he was a nationalist, not a socialist.

No one has said that capitalistic societies cannot understake socialist actions. The co-option of healthcare in America is a socialist action. What, exactly, is your point?


(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/1/2016 1:25:13 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Yes, you saying so disproves it absolutely. (ROFL).

OK< how about you list off as few of these "socialist countries"


China (yes, I know you think its communist. Remember that under marxist theory socialism is the necessary precursor step, until all is perfected. Communist refers to the ultimate goal, not the current state.)

Cuba

Laos

Vietnam

Zimbabwe - Although with them its hard to tell. Mugabe says he's a socialist - but you could argue its just a cult of personality aka dictator.

There are a lot of nations that have a mix of capitalism and socialism; many that include that they are socialistic in their constitutions, when they have in fact moved away from it. India, for example. Other nations such as bolivia are moving toward it.


(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/1/2016 3:41:38 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Of course socialism is central to the issue. Endemic to socialist nations is the promising of social benefits, and the idea of rejiggering society to be more 'fair'.

...


which was exactly what was done by the imperialist conservative Reichskanzler Bismarck as part of his anti-socialist laws in the 1880s

Social security, state pensions, health insurance, invalidity insurance

this was conservative politics of the 19th century





The reason the law is called "anti-socialist" was to undercut rising support for socialism in Germany.
Dawson says Bismark sought to preserve the existing economic order in Germany, whereas the socialist sought to subvert the state and replace the capitalist order with a socialist one.

I suppose I do not really get the point of your argument. No one has said that social safety nets are not a good thing. That doesn't change that they are socialistic.

The fact that Bismark sought to introduce some social reforms is not really questioned. Nor is the fact that he was a nationalist, not a socialist.

No one has said that capitalistic societies cannot understake socialist actions. The co-option of healthcare in America is a socialist action. What, exactly, is your point?



That it is a wise move, in capitalist, socialist, marxist, dictatorships,nutsucerist, and free-market communist societies, you cant have this without a middle class that has some power. See Jeebus.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/1/2016 5:41:18 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

China (yes, I know you think its communist. Remember that under marxist theory socialism is the necessary precursor step, until all is perfected. Communist refers to the ultimate goal, not the current state.)

Nope, neither communist nor socialist. It is a mix of capitalist and fascist.

quote:

Cuba

Nope, merely an old fashioned totalitarian regime
quote:

Laos

I have to admit I am not familiar enough with how their economic infrastructure is organized to be able to say, so you may have this one, though from a brief review, though seeing as the US government has declared it to no longer be a Marxist-Leninist state, it may in fact be a socialist one (seeing as those two things are incompatible).
quote:

Vietnam

Nope, not that one either. It's
quote:

Zimbabwe - Although with them its hard to tell. Mugabe says he's a socialist - but you could argue its just a cult of personality aka dictator.

Nope, also just an old school totalitarian regime.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 6:49:58 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Of course socialism is central to the issue. Endemic to socialist nations is the promising of social benefits, and the idea of rejiggering society to be more 'fair'.

Actually, not a core definition of socialism. Social democratic nations also seek to provide a safety net for the poor, disabled, and elderly, but do not own or control the means of production. Surely, you understand the distinction. Furthermore, a free market cannot function without the guarantee of order provided by a democratic or fascist government.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 7:33:48 AM   
hot4bondage


Posts: 403
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline
~FR~
May Day headlines--riots in Seattle, collapse of Venezuelan government imminent. Compare and contrast?

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 7:51:59 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: hot4bondage

~FR~
May Day headlines--riots in Seattle, collapse of Venezuelan government imminent. Compare and contrast?


Cite please

(in reply to hot4bondage)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 7:57:37 AM   
blnymph


Posts: 1616
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
... What, exactly, is your point?




The point is that the label "socialism" has been used in abundance and without any detailed knowledge of what it means and includes in a simply derogatory manner far too often.

McCarthy was an American phenomenon - so is the "socialism" label as it is applied here on P&R all over.


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 9:10:23 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

The point is that the label "socialism" has been used in abundance and without any detailed knowledge of what it means and includes in a simply derogatory manner far too often.

Yup
quote:

McCarthy was an American phenomenon - so is the "socialism" label as it is applied here on P&R all over.

Yup

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 9:47:45 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: blnymph

The point is that the label "socialism" has been used in abundance and without any detailed knowledge of what it means and includes in a simply derogatory manner far too often.

McCarthy was an American phenomenon - so is the "socialism" label as it is applied here on P&R all over.


That word is always used by ignorant fools to substantiate their assinine beliefs.

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 9:49:20 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

The point is that the label "socialism" has been used in abundance and without any detailed knowledge of what it means and includes in a simply derogatory manner far too often.

Yup
quote:

McCarthy was an American phenomenon - so is the "socialism" label as it is applied here on P&R all over.

Yup


And yup once again.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 10:18:32 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
... What, exactly, is your point?




The point is that the label "socialism" has been used in abundance and without any detailed knowledge of what it means and includes in a simply derogatory manner far too often.

McCarthy was an American phenomenon - so is the "socialism" label as it is applied here on P&R all over.



You are exactly correct. Socialism is defined as govt. ownership of the means of production.

But for political and specific plutocratic, economic interests, the word has been for about 40-50 years, propagandized and as a means to denigrate anything govt. does on behalf of society (the people) at large but is never to be associated with what govt. does for business even though, it does and even more so, to wit:

.....the creation of a word which now is 'socialized' as in socialized medicine in some countries. Where as the greatest segments of the western marketplace that has been 'socialized' is on behalf of business.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 3:40:59 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Of course socialism is central to the issue. Endemic to socialist nations is the promising of social benefits, and the idea of rejiggering society to be more 'fair'.

Actually, not a core definition of socialism. Social democratic nations also seek to provide a safety net for the poor, disabled, and elderly, but do not own or control the means of production. Surely, you understand the distinction. Furthermore, a free market cannot function without the guarantee of order provided by a democratic or fascist government.


And, how would a government that produces nothing on its own provide a,safety net if it didn't control means of production?

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 3:51:19 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

Of course socialism is central to the issue. Endemic to socialist nations is the promising of social benefits, and the idea of rejiggering society to be more 'fair'.

Actually, not a core definition of socialism. Social democratic nations also seek to provide a safety net for the poor, disabled, and elderly, but do not own or control the means of production. Surely, you understand the distinction. Furthermore, a free market cannot function without the guarantee of order provided by a democratic or fascist government.

And, how would a government that produces nothing on its own provide a,safety net if it didn't control means of production?


By paying those that do produce and control the means of production (with money taken from those that produce, ironically enough).

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 3:56:01 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Of course socialism is central to the issue. Endemic to socialist nations is the promising of social benefits, and the idea of rejiggering society to be more 'fair'.

Actually, not a core definition of socialism. Social democratic nations also seek to provide a safety net for the poor, disabled, and elderly, but do not own or control the means of production. Surely, you understand the distinction. Furthermore, a free market cannot function without the guarantee of order provided by a democratic or fascist government.


And, how would a government that produces nothing on its own provide a,safety net if it didn't control means of production?

Govt. taxes the labor of production and some profits of production but does not 'own' the means of production except the labor in govt. and the military...which does produce or purchase the production of millions of people in labor and thus, billion$ worth of products and services and very, very expensively and often corruptly, so.

Without violating law of course, at least most of the time. No, fleecing the pentagon is quite legal.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 4:07:11 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Of course socialism is central to the issue. Endemic to socialist nations is the promising of social benefits, and the idea of rejiggering society to be more 'fair'.

Actually, not a core definition of socialism. Social democratic nations also seek to provide a safety net for the poor, disabled, and elderly, but do not own or control the means of production. Surely, you understand the distinction. Furthermore, a free market cannot function without the guarantee of order provided by a democratic or fascist government.


And, how would a government that produces nothing on its own provide a,safety net if it didn't control means of production?

Govt. taxes the labor of production and some profits of production but does not 'own' the means of production except the labor in govt. and the military...which does produce or purchase the production of millions of people in labor and thus, billion$ worth of products and services and very, very expensively and often corruptly, so.

Without violating law of course, at least most of the time. No, fleecing the pentagon is quite legal.

You miss the point. Vincentml was saying social democrats provide a safety net without controlling the means of production. If you can take from one producer at will, you control the production. vincwntml is caught up in his lexicon and can't see the forest for the trees.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 4:09:55 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
... What, exactly, is your point?




The point is that the label "socialism" has been used in abundance and without any detailed knowledge of what it means and includes in a simply derogatory manner far too often.

McCarthy was an American phenomenon - so is the "socialism" label as it is applied here on P&R all over.



You are exactly correct. Socialism is defined as govt. ownership of the means of production.

But for political and specific plutocratic, economic interests, the word has been for about 40-50 years, propagandized and as a means to denigrate anything govt. does on behalf of society (the people) at large but is never to be associated with what govt. does for business even though, it does and even more so, to wit:

.....the creation of a word which now is 'socialized' as in socialized medicine in some countries. Where as the greatest segments of the western marketplace that has been 'socialized' is on behalf of business.

I disagree with this. Socialism has been demonized by the actions of those who say they are socialists. Pol Pot did much more deionizing than McCarthy ever could.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 4:22:41 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

You are exactly correct. Socialism is defined as govt. ownership of the means of production.

No it is not. Socialism is a socio-economic system that holds that the means of production and distribution ought to be in the hands of the workers, not the government.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 4:24:18 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

And, how would a government that produces nothing on its own provide a,safety net if it didn't control means of production?

Through taxation.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/2/2016 4:26:19 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

If you can take from one producer at will, you control the production.

Dafuq? Sorry but that is simply gibberiswh.
quote:

vincwntml is caught up in his lexicon.

Too bad you aren't

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the bird. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109