Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it....


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... Page: <<   < prev  19 20 21 [22] 23   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/2/2016 8:10:35 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

You appear to be suffering from a faith-based belief that brains produce consciousness. But the fact that the claim is speculative and based on an assumption cannot be dismissed with a wave of a priestly hand. No direct evidence exists for such a claim.

Interesting.

What might be other sources of consciousness?

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 421
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/2/2016 9:45:42 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

I just ran across this interesting article whose headline should make you cum in your drawers. ... until you reach the notion of brain plasticity....

I'm familiar with plasticity, but you obviously don't know what the word "speculation" means. You previously argued....

The emergence is due to the structures not to the materials, how the materials are organized into varying structures, and importantly how the structures are self-organizing through the activity of the nucleic acid chains which provide templates for new structures.

But then, from your link:

“Any theory of consciousness has to be able to explain why a person like that, who’s missing 90% of his neurons, still exhibits normal behavior,” says Cleeremans. A theory of consciousness that depends on “specific neuroanatomical features” (the physical make-up of the brain) would have trouble explaining such cases."

So now you want to bet on plasticity? How could 10% of the brain duplicate the structures of the missing 90%?

Stop dancing, Vincent. You haven't a clue. Nobody does.

Reference:
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4914905

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/2/2016 10:43:04 PM >

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 422
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/2/2016 10:31:40 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

You appear to be suffering from a faith-based belief that brains produce consciousness. But the fact that the claim is speculative and based on an assumption cannot be dismissed with a wave of a priestly hand. No direct evidence exists for such a claim.

Interesting.

What might be other sources of consciousness?

Well that's the question, but unlike Vincent I don't have an answer and he doesn't really know either.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/2/2016 10:43:41 PM >

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 423
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/3/2016 6:33:45 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

What might be other sources of consciousness?

The God within us all.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 424
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/3/2016 2:27:58 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

You appear to be suffering from a faith-based belief that brains produce consciousness. But the fact that the claim is speculative and based on an assumption cannot be dismissed with a wave of a priestly hand. No direct evidence exists for such a claim.

Interesting.

What might be other sources of consciousness?


Well that's the question, but unlike Vincent I don't have an answer and he doesn't really know either.

K.


Unlike Kirata, science is willing to seek answers and build a theory (model) that best fits what is known. He simply throws up his hands in dismay and resignation, content to naysay the current model. Why is the current model important (i.e. consciousness is generated by the brain)? Because it is the basis for crucial diagnostic decisions made everyday in hospitals the world over.

The beauty and power of science as a method of 'finding out' is that it welcomes challenges to prevailing theory because that's where growth of knowledge comes from. New discoveries provide new questions to be explored. Science is the unraveling of (physical) mysteries. You very well know that, Kirata.

What have care-givers and doctors observed in their patients? Consciousness seems to be a continuum from awareness > wakefulness > minimal consciousness > coma > vegetative state (locked in syndrome) > brain death.

The part of the brain responsible for wakefulness is the reticular activating system (RAS), a collection of neurons in the upper brainstem that send widespread stimulatory projections to the areas of the brain responsible for awareness.

The parts of the brain responsible for awareness—the ability to think and perceive—are the neurons (brain cells) in the cortex (grey matter) of the two hemispheres and the axons (communicating projections) in the white matter between those neurons. The brain’s neurons are located in the cerebral cortex—the grey matter at the surface of the brain—and in the deep grey matter in nuclei such as the thalamus. These billions of neurons make trillions of connections via axons in the white matter, constituting functional neural networks that support all conscious effort of the brain, as well as many functions of the brain that do not require consciousness.

Awareness is not a function of solely a single area of the cortex or deep grey matter. Rather, it emerges from the coordinated activity of many parts of the brain. Although consciousness is possible with loss of limited areas of the cortex (as can be seen in some stroke victims), severe and widespread injury to the cortex, thalami, white matter, or any combination of these will result in unconsciousness, even if the RAS is functioning normally.


SOURCE

So, how is it our waterlogged Frenchman was able to live a conscious life? The full healthy brain has trillions of neural connections. Every time we learn something new - a new task or a new bit of data - we form new neural connections. At first the connections may be only electrochemical and provide only short term memory. But practice (or addiction) over time provides for the development of new neural networks (plasticity) wherein we gain long term memory. So, it is not an unreasonable assumption that as he developed (remember the liquid was drained for a time) the patient grew sufficient networks to maintain awareness and to perform tasks sufficient to keep a job and provide a family.

That should not be shocking. The human brain is an awesome instrument and a rich mine for more information about itself.

You just lack respect for the human brain, K.

< Message edited by vincentML -- 7/3/2016 2:35:45 PM >


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 425
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/3/2016 2:38:04 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Unlike Kirata, science is willing to seek answers and build a theory (model) that best fits what is known. He simply throws up his hands in dismay and resignation, content to naysay the current model. Why is the current model important (i.e. consciousness is generated by the brain)? Because it is the basis for crucial diagnostic decisions made everyday in hospitals the world over.

Ignoring your insults and priestly fawning, the model works very nicely for television repairmen too. The only difference is that they don't believe in magic.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/3/2016 2:47:39 PM >

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 426
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/3/2016 2:48:21 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

What have care-givers and doctors observed in their patients? Consciousness seems to be a continuum from awareness > wakefulness > minimal consciousness > coma > vegetative state (locked in syndrome) > brain death.

This was fascinating. Thanks!

I look forward to reading the Cochrane-Williams article once I've printed it out. My old eyes do much better with paper.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 427
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/3/2016 2:58:59 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

What have care-givers and doctors observed in their patients? Consciousness seems to be a continuum from awareness > wakefulness > minimal consciousness > coma > vegetative state (locked in syndrome) > brain death.

But this only addresses human consciousness. The question is broader than that....

To say that awareness "emerges" in certain conditions is simply to state that it becomes evident, without explaining how something that wasn't there before can become "evident" in the first place. I can't claim to hold any firm beliefs on the question, but I don't find it unreasonable to view the situation as a matter of degrees and capacities. ~Link

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

The parts of the brain responsible for awareness—the ability to think and perceive—are the neurons (brain cells) in the cortex (grey matter) of the two hemispheres and the axons (communicating projections) in the white matter between those neurons. The brain’s neurons are located in the cerebral cortex—the grey matter at the surface of the brain—and in the deep grey matter in nuclei such as the thalamus. These billions of neurons make trillions of connections via axons in the white matter, constituting functional neural networks that support all conscious effort of the brain, as well as many functions of the brain that do not require consciousness.

Awareness is not a function of solely a single area of the cortex or deep grey matter. Rather, it emerges from the coordinated activity of many parts of the brain. Although consciousness is possible with loss of limited areas of the cortex (as can be seen in some stroke victims), severe and widespread injury to the cortex, thalami, white matter, or any combination of these will result in unconsciousness, even if the RAS is functioning normally.


A minute ago you were claiming that "plasticity" explains how someone missing 90% of their brain can function normally. Why don't you stop picking whatever quote suits the music you're dancing to and use some of that grey matter to actually think?

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

You just lack respect for the human brain, K.

Well I would have to admit that I see little reason to have much respect for yours.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/3/2016 3:05:51 PM >

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 428
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/5/2016 10:21:32 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
Kirata!

quote:

But this only addresses human consciousness. The question is broader than that....
It is broader only in your theology.

From your link:

But who is to say that matter at all levels does not possess a degree of interior subjective experience, however dim.

We breathlessly await your presentation of some evidence to support your spooky speculation. Otherwise, it is comic book fantasy.

Some material organizations are animate and some are not, but that distinction speaks only to a capacity for responsiveness.

You are wrong. It speaks to intention as well as responsiveness.

We are made from the same earthly materials as rocks.

You are totally lacking in your knowledge of chemistry. Rocks are silicon based whereas organic matter is carbon based. No one has ever demonstrated a structural mechanism or electrochemical impulses in rocks. There's another task for you. Until you achieve your task we shall have to continue to believe there is no similarity except perhaps in the children's adventure movies you attend.

To say that awareness "emerges" in certain conditions is simply to state that it becomes evident, without explaining how something that wasn't there before can become "evident" in the first place.

You would agree I hope that humans and bears both express emergent awareness. You might further agree that the quality of their awareness is different. It is so for several reasons. Bears and humans have different experiential and instinctual long term memories stored as different neural branches in their cortex's. Human brains have plasticized the learned skill of extensive language and the manipulation of symbols, whereas bears not so much. We can safely agree I think that bears and humans have dissimilar subjective experiences and yet both depend on the activation of branched neural tracks that were not present at the beginning development of their brains but grew with experience and practice. In the adult the brain can manifest varying qualities of awareness (at all ages of development of course)

You keep saying that awareness was not present before it became evident. That is your assumption. Awareness is dependent on external or internal stimuli. Awareness becomes evident in response to such stimuli. But who is to say the capacity for specific awareness is not contained in the trillions of neural connections that have developed from the experiences of both the interior and exterior environments?

Here is a simple analogy to consider: when a never before encountered virus enters the biology it encounters protein molecules which form a lock and key relationship with the morphology of the virus. That configuration is stored as a chemical memory in the white cells and antibodies provide emergent awareness of subsequent antigens. As I said, a simple analogy, but it should not be disregarded as a model.

In a related manner prior experiences may be stored as synaptic relationships in the brain, reinforced perhaps, and then emerge as awareness of something similar to the previous proto-experience.

If you were to limit your notion of degrees of awareness "all the way down" to living things we probably would have common ground but when you indulge the inorganic world we differ.

The model of brain centered awareness is critical to our daily living and certainly to medical diagnosis. I think I have made my understanding abundantly clear. If you wish to continue your speculation that non-organic matter has awareness, we simply cannot agree. I think I am done here.

Vincent



< Message edited by vincentML -- 7/5/2016 10:47:07 AM >


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 429
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/5/2016 3:45:10 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Kirata!

quote:

But this only addresses human consciousness. The question is broader than that....

It is broader only in your theology.

My theology? Is making shit up a tactic with you, or just a habit?

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

We breathlessly await your presentation of some evidence to support your spooky speculation. Otherwise, it is comic book fantasy.

That cuts both ways. As I've already pointed out, there is no direct evidence that matter can become conscious.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Some material organizations are animate and some are not, but that distinction speaks only to a capacity for responsiveness.

You are wrong. It speaks to intention as well as responsiveness.

Stop listening to your lamp-socket. Responsiveness does not require intention.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

We are made from the same earthly materials as rocks.

You are totally lacking in your knowledge of chemistry. Rocks are silicon based whereas organic matter is carbon based. No one has ever demonstrated a structural mechanism or electrochemical impulses in rocks. There's another task for you. Until you achieve your task we shall have to continue to believe there is no similarity except perhaps in the children's adventure movies you attend.

Your confidence is exceeded only by your ignorance. Panpsychism would not be limited by chemistry. Do you even understand what you're arguing against?

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

To say that awareness "emerges" in certain conditions is simply to state that it becomes evident, without explaining how something that wasn't there before can become "evident" in the first place.

You would agree I hope that humans and bears both express emergent awareness.

Having just said that I am dubious about the "emergence" interpretation, how in the world could you think I would agree with it? Have you been skipping your ESL classes again?

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

You keep saying that awareness was not present before it became evident. That is your assumption.

Not present? Good grief, are you even taking ESL classes? Don't you think you should at least try to learn the language?

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

The model of brain centered awareness is critical to our daily living and certainly to medical diagnosis.

See here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

If you wish to continue your speculation that non-organic matter has awareness, we simply cannot agree. I think I am done here.

I've told you at least twice (see here and before that here) that it's not my speculation. Why do you keep repeating that lie? Panpsychism has been espoused by a growing number of philosophers and physicists as a solution to the mind-body problem. My only comment was that I don't find it unreasonable.

As for you being done here, yeah we'll see. You've bid this topic farewell before, and so far your word has been as worthless as your arguments.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/5/2016 4:40:23 PM >

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 430
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 5:36:18 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

You asked, are we to assume that rocks have consciousness? I think that sets up consciousness as a straw man. I do not think that rocks are conscious. But who is to say that matter at all levels does not possess a degree of interior subjective experience, however dim


An example of how you speak out of both sides of your mouth, Kirata, to be sure you are never wrong. You say you do not believe that rocks have consciousness but on the other hand why isn't it possible or who is to say that matter at all levels does not possess a degree of subjective experience, however dim?

So, which is it? Rocks are not matter? Or, interior subjective experience is not consciousness of some form?

There are probably medications that will unravel your confusion. Unless of course your confusion is a deliberate literary device aka weasel words.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 431
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 5:43:31 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Panpsychism has been espoused by a growing number of philosophers and physicists as a solution to the mind-body problem. My only comment was that I don't find it unreasonable.

The only reason you never find anything unreasonable is that position allows you to say something without saying it.

And now an appeal to Authority . . . . " a growing number of philosophers and physicists" Why not include the Pope as well? Pretty shabby debate tactics, K.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 432
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 5:50:06 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
plasticity good word that and one of the (physical) tests you do on some soil - rock etc, as we are talking about rocks now, or is what is conciousness. or a soul, what is existence, life etc - i mean that's 3 new threads there anyone

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 433
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 8:04:21 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Panpsychism has been espoused by a growing number of philosophers and physicists as a solution to the mind-body problem. My only comment was that I don't find it unreasonable.

The only reason you never find anything unreasonable is that position allows you to say something without saying it.

I "say" something without saying it. Whoosh. You are at the very least either paranoid or illiterate, and sometimes it looks at lot like both.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

And now an appeal to Authority . . . . " a growing number of philosophers and physicists" Why not include the Pope as well? Pretty shabby debate tactics, K.

Yeah, no. It's not an Appeal to Authority.
    An Appeal to Authority is a fallacy with the following form:

    Person A is (claimed to be) an authority on subject S.
    Person A makes claim C about subject S.
    Therefore, C is true.
And from another source:
    An appeal to authority is an argument from the fact that a person judged to be an authority affirms a proposition to the claim that the proposition is true.
I wasn't arguing that panpsychism is true. I was responding to your continued attempt to pin the position on me. You trimmed the quote.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

If you wish to continue your speculation that non-organic matter has awareness, we simply cannot agree. I think I am done here.

I've told you at least twice (see here and before that here) that it's not my speculation. Why do you keep repeating that lie? Panpsychism has been espoused by a growing number of philosophers and physicists as a solution to the mind-body problem. My only comment was that I don't find it unreasonable.

Have a nice day.

K.

References:
http://www.logicalfallacies.info/
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-authority.html



(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 434
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 8:13:26 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

So, which is it? Rocks are not matter? Or, interior subjective experience is not consciousness of some form?

A while back I said....

At the risk of mutilating the English language, we're aware (at some level) of much more than we're conscious of.

...and you responded, "exactly".

So, which is it?

K.


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 435
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 8:30:55 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

So, which is it? Rocks are not matter? Or, interior subjective experience is not consciousness of some form?

A while back I said....

At the risk of mutilating the English language, we're aware (at some level) of much more than we're conscious of.

...and you responded, "exactly".

So, which is it?

K.


Yeah, but I was talking about organic structured beings, not inanimate matter.

If you wish to believe that inanimate (non-life) non-self-organizing matter may possibly have internal subjective experience give a call to Marvel Comics; they probably have a job for you.


< Message edited by vincentML -- 7/21/2016 8:31:30 AM >


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 436
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 8:36:33 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

plasticity good word that and one of the (physical) tests you do on some soil - rock etc, as we are talking about rocks now, or is what is conciousness. or a soul, what is existence, life etc - i mean that's 3 new threads there anyone

Good word but has different meanings when testing rocks as opposed to talking about the enrichment of neuron networks in the human brain.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 437
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 8:40:36 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

So, which is it? Rocks are not matter? Or, interior subjective experience is not consciousness of some form?

A while back I said....

At the risk of mutilating the English language, we're aware (at some level) of much more than we're conscious of.

...and you responded, "exactly".

So, which is it?

Yeah, but I was talking about organic structured beings, not inanimate matter.

True, but silicon-based life has also been hypothesized. It is far from established that consciousness is limited to carbon-based life forms. And then there is the detail that nobody has ever satisfactorily explained how any organization of matter can become conscious in the first place.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

If you wish to believe that inanimate (non-life) non-self-organizing matter may possibly have internal subjective experience give a call to Marvel Comics; they probably have a job for you.


I never said that I "believed" it or even wanted to. My only comment (stop me if this sounds familiar) was that I don't find the hypothesis unreasonable.

K.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 438
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 9:19:24 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

So, which is it? Rocks are not matter? Or, interior subjective experience is not consciousness of some form?

A while back I said....

At the risk of mutilating the English language, we're aware (at some level) of much more than we're conscious of.

...and you responded, "exactly".

So, which is it?

Yeah, but I was talking about organic structured beings, not inanimate matter.

True, but silicon-based life has also been hypothesized. It is far from established that consciousness is limited to carbon-based life forms. And then there is the detail that nobody has ever satisfactorily explained how any organization of matter can become conscious in the first place.

Wrong. Silicon based life is a speculation because of the tetrahedral bond formations with hydrogen but no one has demonstrated long chains of hydro-silicon molecules so it remains a science fiction. More for you to bring to Marvel Comics.....Rock Man!

It is far from established that anything but carbon based life has consciousness. It has not even been established that all carbon based life possess consciousness. As for the onset of consciousness, if you mean phylo-genetically, then we are out of luck because the evolution of consciousness by its nature had to be a hidden event. So, it is what it is. Deal with it. If you mean within the individual's development there is research attempting to measure the onset of various degrees of consciousness within developing children.


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

If you wish to believe that inanimate (non-life) non-self-organizing matter may possibly have internal subjective experience give a call to Marvel Comics; they probably have a job for you.


I never said that I "believed" it or even wanted to. My only comment (stop me if this sounds familiar) was that I don't find the hypothesis unreasonable.

K.


Your hypotheses are unreasonable if they cannot be tested. If you wish to propose that a hypothesis is not unreasonable it seems incumbent upon you to suggest some form of testing. Otherwise, you are just indulging in Kirata fiction.


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 439
RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... - 7/21/2016 9:46:26 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Your hypotheses are unreasonable if they cannot be tested.
If you wish to propose that a hypothesis is not unreasonable it seems incumbent upon you to suggest some form of testing. Otherwise, you are just indulging in Kirata fiction.

They're not my hypotheses, you dishonest twit, and your attempts to reduce them to some imaginary fiction infecting my mind is getting tiresome. There are a number of hypotheses in Physics and Cosmology that are not at present testable. That doesn't make them unreasonable. You're the one posting fiction here.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/21/2016 9:51:26 AM >

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 440
Page:   <<   < prev  19 20 21 [22] 23   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... Page: <<   < prev  19 20 21 [22] 23   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.197