|
BamaD -> RE: Mass Shooting in Florida (6/12/2016 10:44:16 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ifmaz
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: ifmaz
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: ifmaz
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: ifmaz
Do you want to rethink your "no true Scotsman" stance or are Jews now welcome in the KKK and Aryan Nation?
Even the Amish have their own terrorist group.
And none of them compare to the likes of ISIS.
There were Quaker pirates, but does that mean that as a whole Quakers were no different than the Barbary pirates whose whole society ran on Piracy.
You are comparing a rotten apple to a rotten orchard.
That's the equivalent of saying World War I doesn't count as a world war because more people died in World War II.
It doesn't matter if they compare to ISIS' death toll -- there are numerous Christian terrorist organizations that commit murder.
So if there is another mass killing by one of them we should waste our time talking about how horrible the Moslims are?
Why is it that every time Moslims kill a bunch of people, and remember he claimed to be ISIS and ISIS claimed him some people only want to talk about how bad some Christians have been at some time. All you are doing is minimizing what they have done, it is the everyone does it defense.
I corrected the statement that there are no Christian terrorist organizations murdering people because very clearly there are. You then stated the Christian terrorist organizations were "not Christian" and then proceeded to imply one terrorist organization is more "terroristy" than another because of the death toll.
Since those so called Christian terrorests, unlike the Moslem ones, have been uniformly disowned by Christianity yes there is a difference.
And yes the number of them and the greater damage and the more killing they do make them worse.
So Muslims, by and large, have not rejected the acts of terrorists and in fact really like and support ISIS? Or you don't believe them because it doesn't fit your narrative of "all Muslims are bad"? You take offense to "all gun owners are bad", can you not see the irony?
Do I need to point out the linked article elsewhere in this thread with god-fearing Christians praising the shooter for killing gays? If one was to use the same idiotically wide brush one could therefore state all Christians support murdering people based on what those people do with their genitals.
I would if I had said that. But I have repeatedly said that most Moslems are not terrorists. That I know Moslems who agree with me that ISIS and their ilk are heritics. Even here if you recall, I said there are many more
Moslems who follow this extremest view, not than Moslems who don't, but than Christians who follow the extremist view of their religion.
If you had followed my posting history I have stated that the vast majority
of people killed by the radicals are Moslems and that more extremists are killied by Moslems than by the rest of the world. So your claim that I think'all Mosems are bad" is based on false assumptions or lack of information.
Do I have to start evey post with a disclaimer that there are indeed many good Moslems to avoid you assuming I am Islamaphobic.
|
|
|
|
