RE: Hjernevask (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tamaka -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 11:43:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

And Dani Berry is not the only trans-woman to express significant regret. Of course, these days any teenager afflicted with hormones can find a read horde of genderfuck cunts on Tumblr who will teach them that they're genderqueer and lecture them on the importance of pronouns.

Basically, there's a lot of stupid people running around inflicting their own personal psychoses on impressionable teenagers. Calling yourself trans is another way of becoming part of the identity politics rainbow parade. It's stupid and dangerous.


Very good point. There is a big danger of this happening. Teens are very susceptible to cultural trends. And all the hype surrounding this issue is almost encouraging kids to consider ideas for themselves that they would never consider before. Body modification becomes much more dangerous when you move from tattoos, piercings and crazy haircolors and clothes to tampering with your body's physical development with hormones and surgeries.


quote:

People are often at the mercy of their beliefs but deep change work is possible. The problem is that most trans-identifying people will never submit themselves to any kind of therapeutic intervention designed to address their mind because there's a ready army of what the literature refers to as "fucking morons" who will instinctively cheer-lead any non-white, non-male, non cis or non-heterosexual development in an otherwise nominal individual's life.

I don't give a fuck if someone is queer, I really don't. However there are a lot of very stupid people who are more invested in validating their own status than they are in the happiness of the lives of others. And those stupid people will assert fucking nonsense in their quest to fill up the world with reflections of themselves.



I agree... something along the lines of 'misery loves company'.
And alot of people are making money off of this trend. It seems to be embraced as a new profitable industry and as usual, to kick start the sales cycle requires a lot of marketing.




vincentML -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 12:23:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

And Dani Berry is not the only trans-woman to express significant regret. Of course, these days any teenager afflicted with hormones can find a read horde of genderfuck cunts on Tumblr who will teach them that they're genderqueer and lecture them on the importance of pronouns.

Basically, there's a lot of stupid people running around inflicting their own personal psychoses on impressionable teenagers. Calling yourself trans is another way of becoming part of the identity politics rainbow parade. It's stupid and dangerous.


Very good point. There is a big danger of this happening. Teens are very susceptible to cultural trends. And all the hype surrounding this issue is almost encouraging kids to consider ideas for themselves that they would never consider before. Body modification becomes much more dangerous when you move from tattoos, piercings and crazy haircolors and clothes to tampering with your body's physical development with hormones and surgeries.


quote:

People are often at the mercy of their beliefs but deep change work is possible. The problem is that most trans-identifying people will never submit themselves to any kind of therapeutic intervention designed to address their mind because there's a ready army of what the literature refers to as "fucking morons" who will instinctively cheer-lead any non-white, non-male, non cis or non-heterosexual development in an otherwise nominal individual's life.

I don't give a fuck if someone is queer, I really don't. However there are a lot of very stupid people who are more invested in validating their own status than they are in the happiness of the lives of others. And those stupid people will assert fucking nonsense in their quest to fill up the world with reflections of themselves.



I agree... something along the lines of 'misery loves company'.
And alot of people are making money off of this trend. It seems to be embraced as a new profitable industry and as usual, to kick start the sales cycle requires a lot of marketing.


Awareness began this thread with "scientific based" evidence for biological determinism for gender identity but now you are both saying it can be socially induced. I am a tad confused.

Furthermore, he is now proposing "deep therapy." Seems a glaring contradiction to me. I have never heard of a talk therapy that could change a biologically determined personality trait (if there even is such a thing)

You see my point? Looks to me like he would have it both ways.

Couple other things . . surely there are laws and codes of ethics that safeguard teenagers from GRS. Furthermore, the cost and current procedure stand in the way as well. Let's not forget that Dani was an adult when the surgery took place. This talk about vulnerable teenagers seems like scare mongering.




tamaka -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 1:05:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

And Dani Berry is not the only trans-woman to express significant regret. Of course, these days any teenager afflicted with hormones can find a read horde of genderfuck cunts on Tumblr who will teach them that they're genderqueer and lecture them on the importance of pronouns.

Basically, there's a lot of stupid people running around inflicting their own personal psychoses on impressionable teenagers. Calling yourself trans is another way of becoming part of the identity politics rainbow parade. It's stupid and dangerous.


Very good point. There is a big danger of this happening. Teens are very susceptible to cultural trends. And all the hype surrounding this issue is almost encouraging kids to consider ideas for themselves that they would never consider before. Body modification becomes much more dangerous when you move from tattoos, piercings and crazy haircolors and clothes to tampering with your body's physical development with hormones and surgeries.


quote:

People are often at the mercy of their beliefs but deep change work is possible. The problem is that most trans-identifying people will never submit themselves to any kind of therapeutic intervention designed to address their mind because there's a ready army of what the literature refers to as "fucking morons" who will instinctively cheer-lead any non-white, non-male, non cis or non-heterosexual development in an otherwise nominal individual's life.

I don't give a fuck if someone is queer, I really don't. However there are a lot of very stupid people who are more invested in validating their own status than they are in the happiness of the lives of others. And those stupid people will assert fucking nonsense in their quest to fill up the world with reflections of themselves.



I agree... something along the lines of 'misery loves company'.
And alot of people are making money off of this trend. It seems to be embraced as a new profitable industry and as usual, to kick start the sales cycle requires a lot of marketing.


Awareness began this thread with "scientific based" evidence for biological determinism for gender identity but now you are both saying it can be socially induced. I am a tad confused.

Furthermore, he is now proposing "deep therapy." Seems a glaring contradiction to me. I have never heard of a talk therapy that could change a biologically determined personality trait (if there even is such a thing)

You see my point? Looks to me like he would have it both ways.

Couple other things . . surely there are laws and codes of ethics that safeguard teenagers from GRS. Furthermore, the cost and current procedure stand in the way as well. Let's not forget that Dani was an adult when the surgery took place. This talk about vulnerable teenagers seems like scare mongering.



vin,
I don't know if this is your normal modus operandi but i've noticed that you take valid thoughts and ideas and try to incite an emotional aversion to them by sensationalizing them under a category that had no validity in the thought. I brought up a very reasonable idea related to disassociation and gender identity and instead of allowing it to be discussed on its own merit you raise the flag of 'Christian Fundamentalism' which had no basis at all in my reasoning... but it automatically incited a negative reaction to my thoughts of a possibility, which i am sure is true in some cases.

Then Awareness and I discuss another perfectly valid and reasonable concern for a vulnerable population and how it might be impacted by all the 'hype'... as a parent and a teacher and a background in psychology this is a very reasonable concern. Yet you raise the flag of scare mongering.

It seems like you like to devalue other's valid thoughts, opinions and ideas by your 'Seems Like' sensationalistic labeling instead of discussing the actual thoughts presented. Whether this is intentional or not, i 'm not sure.




vincentML -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 1:24:55 PM)

quote:

It seems like you like to devalue other's valid thoughts, opinions and ideas by your 'Seems Like' sensationalistic labeling instead of discussing the actual thoughts presented. Whether this is intentional or not, i 'm not sure.

You are reading me wrong, Tam. although I can see your concern.

You brought up two ideas to be discussed but without any supporting material. If you wish to discuss associative gender identity and at risk teens you ought to at least present some basis for your opinion . . . either before or after a response. Seriously, I am not in the business of denigrating other people or their ideas. However, those ideas should be defended, doncha think?




vincentML -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 1:36:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Then, what do we mean by "intermediate genders?" Does that mean there are three, four, or five genders? Or does it mean that the brain and body are not in agreement, ... [...]



What do we mean by intermediate genders? One thing that we do mean is that the gender of the person(s) in question varies significantly from the cultural ideals of masculinity and femininity that society does so much to promote.

If we lay out all the evidence on gender without imposing any value or cultural assumptions on that data, we find that no matter the criterion of gender (eg physical sexual characteristics, behaviour, appearance, etc) used to define the data, one finds that the data forms a spectrum or continuum not discrete categories of masculine and feminine. Granted the data is loaded into clusters of masculine and feminine at either end of the spectrum but there is no actual point of separation that works in all cases. The data will form an upside down bell curve in all cases.

Okay, so I had to think about this for awhile. If a negative bell curve of identity distributions . . . I take negative to mean the number of discrete identities decrease toward the depth of the bell the further from either "abundant" maleness or femaleness. Do I have that correct? And doesn't the calculus of any curve require discrete events no matter how narrow the incidents may be? I guess I am wrestling with the notion of gender fluidity here, or at least the prevalence of it.




PeonForHer -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 2:30:55 PM)

FR

Something worth plonking in here, if only because it's 'hot off the press':

"Neuroscientist Prof Gina Rippon, of Aston University, Birmingham, says gender differences emerge only through environmental factors and are not innate. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10684179/Men-and-women-do-not-have-different-brains-claims-neuroscientist.html

"Not only are we feeding the ‘neuro-trash’ industry misunderstanding about what we do but we are also feeding the ‘inner whimp’ of people out there who believe they can or can’t do something based on whether they are male or female,” Prof Rippon said. “There’s really good evidence that male and female behaviour is not that different. Nor are male and female brains. A recent study looked at 116 ways of measuring parts of the brain and concluded that you can’t divided the brain into two groups (male and female), whether it be thickness of cortex, structure or connections,” she said."

https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/science/gender-hardwiring-neuro-trash-says-leading-academic/




tamaka -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 2:37:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

It seems like you like to devalue other's valid thoughts, opinions and ideas by your 'Seems Like' sensationalistic labeling instead of discussing the actual thoughts presented. Whether this is intentional or not, i 'm not sure.

You are reading me wrong, Tam. although I can see your concern.

You brought up two ideas to be discussed but without any supporting material. If you wish to discuss associative gender identity and at risk teens you ought to at least present some basis for your opinion . . . either before or after a response. Seriously, I am not in the business of denigrating other people or their ideas. However, those ideas should be defended, doncha think?


Ok the basis for my opinion was my education, experience combined with some common sense. But i appreciate your suggestion and did a google search and found out it was worse than i thought... it's actually affecting the primary school children too. Geeze.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/12/28/transgender-fad-rapidly-spreading-primary-schools-clusters-emerging-children-copy-friends/

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90229789


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439126/transgender-teens-parents-rapid-onset-gender-dysphoria-doctors




tweakabelle -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 4:11:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Then Awareness and I discuss another perfectly valid and reasonable concern for a vulnerable population and how it might be impacted by all the 'hype'... as a parent and a teacher and a background in psychology this is a very reasonable concern. Yet you raise the flag of scare mongering.



Awareness' refusal to recognise the validity of transgender experience and his incessant denigration of TGs as "mentally ill" is not a "perfectly valid and reasonable concern for a vulnerable population". It is the stigmatising and marginalising of an entire community of people whose misfortune is to be unable to be compatible with Awareness' insane ideas or society's gender straitjackets.

His suggestion that psychotherapy might be an alternative treatment flies in the face of the repeated reports from psychotherapists themselves for over half a century that they have been totally unable to shift TG's sense of their own genders. In other words, this approach has been tried and consistently found to be a lamentable failure, as any one with any familiarity with the literature on TGs (despite all its faults) would know. Indeed this failure is often cited by psychotherapists and other medical specialists involved with TGs as the reason for their adopting the approach they do - which is usually dispensing hormones and less often SRS.

Awareness's position is not founded on knowledge or a familiarity with the issues. He is coming from a position of ignorance, which is one of the few consistencies in his posts. as other have noted. Like so much of Awareness' 'positions' it seems to rely on hate, ego aggrandisement and a need to denigrate anyone who has the temerity to disagree with this self proclaimed expert on all things. There is no reason for it to be taken seriously by anyone with a genuine concern for gender variant people.

Can I also add that Breitbart is not a reputable site for information on this issue. In fact it is difficult to nominate any issue on which Breitbart is reputable or reliable.




tweakabelle -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 4:14:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Okay, so I had to think about this for awhile. If a negative bell curve of identity distributions . . . I take negative to mean the number of discrete identities decrease toward the depth of the bell the further from either "abundant" maleness or femaleness. Do I have that correct? And doesn't the calculus of any curve require discrete events no matter how narrow the incidents may be? I guess I am wrestling with the notion of gender fluidity here, or at least the prevalence of it.

Yes. [:D]




PeonForHer -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 4:19:19 PM)

quote:


Awareness's position is not founded on knowledge or a familiarity with the issues. He is coming from a position of ignorance, which is one of the few consistencies in his posts. as other have noted. Like so much of Awareness' 'positions' it seems to rely on hate, ego aggrandisement and a need to denigrate anyone who has the temerity to disagree with this self proclaimed expert on all things. There is no reason for it to be taken seriously by anyone with a genuine concern for gender variant people


My own conclusion on Awareness's position on this, as in many other matters, is that Awareness is a fruitcake, Tweakabelle.

I hope that this helps the discussion at hand in some small way.




tweakabelle -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 4:22:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Then Awareness and I discuss another perfectly valid and reasonable concern for a vulnerable population and how it might be impacted by all the 'hype'... as a parent and a teacher and a background in psychology this is a very reasonable concern. Yet you raise the flag of scare mongering.



Awareness' refusal to recognise the validity of transgender experience and his incessant denigration of TGs as "mentally ill" is not a "perfectly valid and reasonable concern for a vulnerable population". It is the stigmatising and marginalising of an entire community of people whose misfortune is to be unable to be compatible with Awareness' insane ideas or society's gender straitjackets.

His suggestion that psychotherapy might be an alternative treatment flies in the face of the repeated reports from psychotherapists themselves for over half a century that they have been totally unable to shift adult TG's sense of their own genders. In other words, this approach has been tried and consistently found to be a lamentable failure, as any one with any familiarity with the literature on TGs (despite all its faults) would know. Indeed this failure is often cited in the literature by psychotherapists and other medical specialists involved with TGs as the reason for their adopting the approach they do - which is usually dispensing hormones and less often SRS.

Awareness's position is not founded on knowledge or a familiarity with the issues. He is coming from a position of ignorance, which is one of the few consistencies in his posts. as other have noted. Like so many of Awareness' 'positions' it seems to rely on hate, ego aggrandisement and an over-riding need to denigrate anyone who has the temerity to disagree with this self proclaimed expert on all things. There is no reason for it to be taken seriously by anyone with a genuine concern for gender variant people.

Can I also add that Breitbart is not a reputable site for information on this issue. In fact it is difficult to nominate any issue on which Breitbart is reputable or reliable.





tamaka -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 6:02:57 PM)

I'm one of those people who think 'Do No Harm' is a good standard to live by. Therefore i would think each individual case needs to be dealt with by loved ones, friends, and appropriate professionals. Along with concern and caring for the individuals who are gender variant, i think we also must equally be concerned for and care about the vulnerable population of individuals (toddlers, young children, through teens) to make sure we don't cause harm to those who otherwise wouldn't have a problem. That is the only point that i was trying to make and i feel it is a balanced and reasonable perspective.




tweakabelle -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 11:43:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

I'm one of those people who think 'Do No Harm' is a good standard to live by. Therefore i would think each individual case needs to be dealt with by loved ones, friends, and appropriate professionals. Along with concern and caring for the individuals who are gender variant, i think we also must equally be concerned for and care about the vulnerable population of individuals (toddlers, young children, through teens) to make sure we don't cause harm to those who otherwise wouldn't have a problem. That is the only point that i was trying to make and i feel it is a balanced and reasonable perspective.

Thank you for your contributions and concerns. They have added to the discussion. I appreciate the point that you are making, and agree that there is far too much emphasis on seeing TG as a medical condition to be 'cured' with a diet of hormones and SRS. Most TGs decline to have SRS and it seems that growing numbers are also declining 'cross-gender hormones' too. The day when TGs finally free themselves of medical interventions in order to realise their sense of self cannot come too soon IMHO.

The emphasis on medical matters leads to the social sphere being overlooked, undervalued and often ignored by the alleged 'experts' who deal in orthodox medical approaches to TGs. TGs face incredible levels of abuse from every sector and level of society, levels of abuse that are sufficient in themselves to explain the levels of mental illness sometimes reported among TGs. I suspect that any one of us who had to face their core identity being questioned and mocked by complete strangers everyday would quickly develop anxiety and depressive disorders.

But that's life for many TGs - human rights is a distant and abstract concept for many TGs. When one looks at the entrenched hate and bias to be found in several posts on this thread, it's easy to understand why. If a minority of kinkroids are this abusive and intolerant, one can imagine the horrors dealt out by straight society to TGs.




tweakabelle -> RE: Hjernevask (10/27/2016 11:50:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


Awareness's position is not founded on knowledge or a familiarity with the issues. He is coming from a position of ignorance, which is one of the few consistencies in his posts. as other have noted. Like so much of Awareness' 'positions' it seems to rely on hate, ego aggrandisement and a need to denigrate anyone who has the temerity to disagree with this self proclaimed expert on all things. There is no reason for it to be taken seriously by anyone with a genuine concern for gender variant people


My own conclusion on Awareness's position on this, as in many other matters, is that Awareness is a fruitcake, Tweakabelle.


Yes. Your conclusion is unavoidable. Awareness' posts here (both on this thread and others) provide ample evidence that leads to and supports your conclusion. No other explanation is available to any one who, following the scientific method, examines and analyses the evidence and then forms the obvious and inevitable conclusion.

Awareness is a fruitcake par excellence.




vincentML -> RE: Hjernevask (10/28/2016 9:42:08 AM)

quote:

But that's life for many TGs - human rights is a distant and abstract concept for many TGs. When one looks at the entrenched hate and bias to be found in several posts on this thread, it's easy to understand why. If a minority of kinkroids are this abusive and intolerant, one can imagine the horrors dealt out by straight society to TGs.

Excellent post, Tweakabelle [sm=applause.gif]




Awareness -> RE: Hjernevask (10/28/2016 11:35:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Awareness began this thread with "scientific based" evidence for biological determinism for gender identity but now you are both saying it can be socially induced. I am a tad confused.
You're not confused, you're simply being deliberately obtuse and misrepresenting my very clear statements. I can see you are a waste of time and will not be bothering with you further. Your mutual masturbation session with Tweakabelle gives me a pretty clear indication of your lack of intellectual honesty.




Awareness -> RE: Hjernevask (10/28/2016 11:40:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
I hope that this helps the discussion at hand in some small way.
One of the interesting things is how "male feminists" become feminised, not only in their thoughts and beliefs but also in their patterns of behaviour.

I've basically taken you both down a peg or two, neither of you can mount counter arguments and what is the result? You behave Peon, like a weak little girl. You talk *about* someone to someone else. Because you lack gumption. Because you lack balls. Because you lack testosterone.

And you wonder why I have contempt for pitiful specimens such as yourself. Really? REALLY?

One day, if you grow up, you might one day gain some self-respect. Behaving like a fucking pussy, is not how you're going to achieve that.




Awareness -> RE: Hjernevask (10/28/2016 11:42:28 PM)

LOL! You lack the necessary facilities for debate, so this is your response? Pathetic.

If you have a PHD, you got it out of a pack of Kellogg's Cornflakes. Social scientist, my ass! ROFL!




Awareness -> RE: Hjernevask (10/28/2016 11:51:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Very good point. There is a big danger of this happening. Teens are very susceptible to cultural trends. And all the hype surrounding this issue is almost encouraging kids to consider ideas for themselves that they would never consider before. Body modification becomes much more dangerous when you move from tattoos, piercings and crazy haircolors and clothes to tampering with your body's physical development with hormones and surgeries.
It's more than just cultural trends. Teens are incredibly susceptible to influence via social proof. Given that social proof appears to have influence with regard to suicide contagion, it seems unlikely they're immune to fellow teens who declare themselves as gender # 5 of 12 and insist on being referred to as "them" - stupid as though that might sound.

quote:


I agree... something along the lines of 'misery loves company'.
It's more a sense of validation and the desire to see their own feelings reflected back at them.
quote:


And alot of people are making money off of this trend. It seems to be embraced as a new profitable industry and as usual, to kick start the sales cycle requires a lot of marketing.
Well aside from the morons at Buzzfeed and Gawker, I haven't considered this to be a prime moneymaking venture. It seems more like a cultural straightjacket that the SJW's would like to fit us all for. The leftist virtue-signalling in public spaces is an element of the new censorship and social enforcement that is being constructed by these types and the doctrine of discomfort being promoted is the kind of prime idiocy which is turning out a generation of useless, hypersensitive emo-homofags.




bounty44 -> RE: Hjernevask (10/29/2016 3:21:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

But that's life for many TGs - human rights is a distant and abstract concept for many TGs. When one looks at the entrenched hate and bias to be found in several posts on this thread, it's easy to understand why. If a minority of kinkroids are this abusive and intolerant, one can imagine the horrors dealt out by straight society to TGs.

Excellent post, Tweakabelle [sm=applause.gif]


no its not an excellent post---unless you count excellence in illustrating how lefties redefine "hate" to mean anything or anyone who speaks contrary to their ideology.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125