RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


WhoreMods -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/20/2016 5:41:41 AM)

Apart from the one in Gotham, who Will Smith's other half kneecapped.




mnottertail -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/20/2016 10:41:01 AM)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvKyBcCDOB4




WhoreMods -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/20/2016 3:07:48 PM)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNBtXxRhBPk




Real0ne -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/23/2016 8:52:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

What you are telling us is that this country the US, was colonized by the European royals and their offspring. Next question.

I would imagine that most Asian leaders can be traced by some blood back to the Khans and the Mongols who after their conquests...assured Asian miscegenation. So what ?

Every blood line had to start somewhere.




So what?
They obviously knew something about governance that is long lost in the minds of todays well conditioned slaves who are now incapable of connecting the dots to escape the 'matrix'.

Its takes some serious fucking leverage to make a ratified amendment disappear.


[img]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/constitution/1840amcitrefman1.jpg[/img]

[img]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/constitution/1840amcitrefman2.jpg[/img]


We would not have criminals who are immune from prosecution we have today in office if that original amendment didnt mysteriously disappear. [:D]
quote:




Next question.

Like I said stop whining about the injustices of the aristocratic rapists on one hand and condoning it in the other.

This country was not intended to be run by 'aristocratic leaders', it was intend to be run by people.

The only governating you [the people] get to do is vote in your new democratic dictators from the big club.




I am neither whining about or condoning anything, I merely state a fact if life. As for all of the angst and worry you blather about...what was supposed to happen ? Lineage is not policy.

Your post is merely a detailed recitation of the lineage that 500+ years of European colonialism and amalgamation and otherwise means nothing.

The American people are too apathetic, too lazy and too stupid to do any such thing as truly rise up about it. In fact, for Americans to want many specific actions, make specific reforms and in some ways, to dissent at all...makes you a terrorist. And we all know who to blame for that.

How's this ? I believe he is the 2nd or 3rd cousin removed of the fucking queen of England...aging on her immoral, gold-plated throne as we type. So, what the fuck now ?

Our founders studied Greece, Rome, Kant, Burke and Hobbes, knew of the reasons for downfall and didn't insist on protections against that same occurrence here. And in fact, it was the failing of Madison & Co. who among those who deified just that lineage, to constitutionally protect this country from the evils you suggest directly result from it.

There is no escaping history here, either the people rise up or suffer the consequences. So, yes we are now witness to the beginning of the end of the American experiment in a democratic republic and...its empire.



The object of the revolution was to break away from overlord rule by a few to self government by the people at large that must live under whatever rules are made, and instead it merely broke away from one ruling few and into the hands of another ruling few.

Voting for different overlords every few years serves to prove the point, not disprove it.

Moreover it becomes clear the revolution did not accomplish what is purported, and merely put new words to SSDD governance.

The attached words change, the end result does not, you are slaves to your overlords and have no control over the rules you must live under.

Those in power know how to retain that power and use every deceptive measure to insure it. The evidence is irrefutable and damning who is in control.


All U.S. presidents bar one are directly descended from a medieval English king

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2183858/All-presidents-bar-directly-descended-medieval-English-king.html#ixzz4NvJMZSLh



Both Clintons and the Bushes all directly descended from brit royalty.


and we should turn a blind eye?

Had the original 13th amendment not magically vaporized none of them would be eligible to run for office.

The logical question that follows is who would have an undisputed interest in vaporizing an amendment that removed any all aristocracy their posterity and or descendents from holding office in the US?








mnottertail -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/23/2016 10:14:37 AM)

The DailyMail? Get something credible like the National Enquirer, or InfoWars or EEYULEEYULdotcom or Tinfoilerswithoutstraightjacketsdotcom




WhoreMods -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/24/2016 4:56:17 AM)

At least it isn't David Irving...




Real0ne -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/24/2016 7:14:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

The DailyMail? Get something credible like the National Enquirer, or InfoWars or EEYULEEYULdotcom or Tinfoilerswithoutstraightjacketsdotcom




Your level of dipshittedness is so hard to find in the world they even write songs about it!

"Listen in awe and you'll hear him.... Bark at the moon..... Hey, bark at the moon"


Must be very painful seeing your meal ticket exposed and on the edge of slipping away






mnottertail -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/24/2016 9:27:03 AM)

your groveling and shiteating is noisome. Factless hallucinatory retarded slobbering is not proof of anything to you.

we can add another area in life that you have no knowledge of. Genealogy.





blnymph -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/25/2016 1:54:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:

What you are telling us is that this country the US, was colonized by the European royals and their offspring. Next question.

...

All U.S. presidents bar one are directly descended from a medieval English king

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2183858/All-presidents-bar-directly-descended-medieval-English-king.html#ixzz4NvJMZSLh



Both Clintons and the Bushes all directly descended from brit royalty.


and we should turn a blind eye?

Had the original 13th amendment not magically vaporized none of them would be eligible to run for office.

The logical question that follows is who would have an undisputed interest in vaporizing an amendment that removed any all aristocracy their posterity and or descendents from holding office in the US?






The logical question that follows is rather how such "research" can be done when written birth records in Europe were only introduced in the late 16th century by the Council of Trent (meaning that protestants started those even later). So tracing back American presidents "directly" to King John of England (early 13th c.) will face the little problem of bridging a few centuries without any birth and marriage records with ... what?

This is ridiculously absurd.

P.S. It should have been released in a 1st of April issue.




blnymph -> RE: Roots: Bill and Hillary Take America back home in style! (10/26/2016 11:25:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
...
How All Presidents Are Related To King John

In my attempts to expose the genealogical “royal” bloodline – the passing of pure blood type as opposed to mere genealogical “family tree” relation – I came across a researcher from Ancestry.com named Tim Dowling. On his site, and reproduced below, Mr. Dowling has connected the trees of all U.S. Presidents to the Plantagenet King John circa 12oo A.D.

DIRECTIONS: To see the full charts or tree for each president, click on the “Relationship to King John” link below, and then on the next page click either the “tree” link or the link below that which looks like this:

Ancestry of George Washington, President up to John of England, King

This presentation will hopefully satisfy those who were not satisfied with my previous presentation of mere cousin relationships between all U.S. Presidents, which can partially be found at this link: http://www.geni.com/blog/look-whos-related-george-washington-and-all-the-presidents-325451.html

Please click on the links in this chart for detailed geneology connections to the “royal” blood, and remember…

“It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”
...
–Jewels of the Crown – “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”
...

34 of the 44 previous presidents have been direct genetic descendants from just one person, Charlemagne- the brutal eighth century King of the Franks and 19 of them directly descended from King Edward III of England. In fact, the presidential candidate with the most royal genes has won every single American election.
...




This is, as shown above, fairytales and nonsense, even if called royal nonsense.

Since the Carolingians as well as the Plantagenets died out centuries before Columbus set sail, there are, by nature, also none of their descendants in the US.

The link you gave leads to a page of ... well, not historians at all. Their attitude towards that subject is a rather fanciful one.

They love filling gaps in the records - and there are gaps centuries wide - just by linking family names for instance. But this method is no proof of anything. Every Scot may tell you that not every "Mac" is descendant of a clan chief. Names are derived from place names, professions, loyalties asf. Names exist not once but dozens of times without their bearers being relatives.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.109375