RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


PeonForHer -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:25:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
Women's bodies were designed to conceive.



Mine wasn't.




Well then, you can't be a woman, can you?

[That was said with *heavy* irony.]




Danemora -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:28:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Danemora

A body might have been designed evolutionarily to conceive children. However things like medication (Google DES babies), infertility, or surgical removal of reproductive body parts makes conception difficult or impossible.
Yes, but those are later events which don't impact the "designed" criteria. To say your body wasn't designed for reproduction implies either significant genetic damage or simply never having a womb in the first place.



In the case of DES daughters, that change took place in the womb before the child was even born though. It wasnt a later in life change. So while the 'design criteria' is that females are designed to host babies, the criteria can be altered in a number of ways. An oddly shaped uterus, reproductive organs tilted off the appropriate axis by even fractions of millimeters, some hormone that should have been turned on in the mother during a certain period of fetal growth that wasnt, etc

So there are more reasons than just the crack you made about someone being trans




PeonForHer -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:39:03 AM)

NM. It's just too blatantly obvious. [:D]




Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:47:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Where did i point out that i think my way is the best way exactly?

Actually, in almost every post you make dear. You may not see it, but it is there.


I don't think so. I would think that what is best for me probably isn't best at all for most people. Maybe it just sounds best to you.



Omg, back peddle much? If you didn't think your way was the best way you wouldn't have felt the need to call out male subs and female Dommes. You wouldn't have used condescending language when referring to male subs. Nobody, not even you, uses condescension unless they think they know better. Stop playing dumb



Maybe i called them out because i don't think it's a good thing. Get it?



Because you obviously think you know better. GOT IT?





OsideGirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:50:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Danemora


In the case of DES daughters, that change took place in the womb before the child was even born though. It wasnt a later in life change.

So there are more reasons than just the crack you made about someone being trans



I'm a DES daughter, I have PCOS (a hereditary condition) and I carry the antibody that causes miscarriages (and I'm allergic to the treatment).

All of which were things that I was born with.

So, no, my body clearly wasn't intended to have children.




Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:50:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl
So what about women who can't have children, or women past child bearing, or protected/anal/safe sex, fertility treatments? I'm really confused why you think peen in vag sex to make da bebbies is all there is to life. Especially when any bdsm activities you yourself are involved in likely don't have the end goal of making babies.
Do you even have kids?


Yeah, pretty much.

I kind of saw it coming, but as soon as reproduction enters the argument it signals the point in the argument where either the tamakas of the world need to take something back or we start having ridiculous arguments about whether or not all non-reproductive sex is unnatural and homosexuals are on the same level as child molesters, etc. On a kink forum no less!

That kind of judgmental attitude isn't going to fly...


I love how basic facts become judgmental attitudes. You asked a specific question and you didn't like the honest, obvious answer. A man can fuck my ass all day and it isn't going to make a baby. Women's bodies were designed to conceive. Men's weren't.


And those born without the ability to conceive, are they mistakes? Do they not deserve a relationship or sex? Men can receive as well if not conceive(at least not yet). Prostate stimulation wouldn't feel so damn good if they weren't meant to receive.




Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:53:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl
So what about women who can't have children, or women past child bearing, or protected/anal/safe sex, fertility treatments? I'm really confused why you think peen in vag sex to make da bebbies is all there is to life. Especially when any bdsm activities you yourself are involved in likely don't have the end goal of making babies.
Do you even have kids?


Yeah, pretty much.

I kind of saw it coming, but as soon as reproduction enters the argument it signals the point in the argument where either the tamakas of the world need to take something back or we start having ridiculous arguments about whether or not all non-reproductive sex is unnatural and homosexuals are on the same level as child molesters, etc. On a kink forum no less!

That kind of judgmental attitude isn't going to fly...


I love how basic facts become judgmental attitudes. You asked a specific question and you didn't like the honest, obvious answer. A man can fuck my ass all day and it isn't going to make a baby. Women's bodies were designed to conceive. Men's weren't.

There's an inherent resistance in here to the concept that human beings are gendered in any way. I put it down to a fundamental inability to deal with reality. Ideas of gender as a social construction are generally championed by the less successful and the androgynous - primarily because they're failures along the various masculinity/femininity axes.

It's kind of like losing the game then pretending it doesn't exist. In many ways it's probably a self-delusional survival tactic - their brains protecting them from the pain of reality... however I think that, in the end, the price they pay won't be worth it.


Excuse me? I have several men falling over themselves to get at me, have 3 kids, a masters degree and am attractive by many people's standards. Where does my failure lie on the feminine axis other than not being a sycophant follower of your limited worldview?




Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:56:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
He asked about what about a women's biology makes her thrive as a submissive. I answered him with the fact that a women's biology waa designed to receive (no matter what position your in) in order to fulfill the biological function she was designed for.

What has babies, or being able to have one, got to do being submissive??
That's the biggest load of bullshit I've heard for a long time.

One has no bearing on the other.
Why do I say that??
Because one is a mindset, the other is purely a physical ability.
....and they don't always meet.



Oh god, we agree on something.





OsideGirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 9:56:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
Women's bodies were designed to conceive.



Mine wasn't.




Well then, you can't be a woman, can you?

[That was said with *heavy* irony.]


Don't make me come over there...... [;)]




Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:08:01 AM)

Awareness, I have a video for you
Straight White Male




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:20:56 AM)

quote:

Without it, they're empty vessels, waiting to be filled by their future owner.

No sorry, I just don't buy that, however, we are getting into psychological areas here, and I do not know the proper terminology, so this will likely just devolve into a semantic dispute over the appropriateness of my choice of words, so I am just going to leave it at that.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:22:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

surely each fulfils something in the other. A slave fulfils herself by keeping her Master happy but surely by the same token, what is a Master without a slave to guide and fulfil and at the same time, fulfil himself ?

Well one would have thought that was obvious, but apparently "true" slaves do it purely to fulfill their Masters and get nothing out of it themselves. Well, at least according to some on here.


They get something out of it but it doesn't come from themselves... it comes from their Master.


I disagree




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:23:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Where did i point out that i think my way is the best way exactly?

Actually, in almost every post you make dear. You may not see it, but it is there.


I don't think so. I would think that what is best for me probably isn't best at all for most people. Maybe it just sounds best to you.


Well you do dear, and no what you describe as best for you does not sound best to me, it sounds quite horrible to me.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:26:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

then the society will descend into Bacchanalian anarchy

Sounds good to me.
Societies without laws are where the strong enforce their will upon the weak. Are you happy to become a possession?


Oh dear, you don't even understand your own simile. A Baccchanlian anarchy does not imply a society without laws. But really, thanks for trying.
They're words. They have meanings. If you don't understand them, that's entirely your own problem.


LOL
Irony, thy name is Awareness. [:D]




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:37:14 AM)

FR
For what it is worth, all the discussion about women who are unable to conceive in no way counters the argument tamaka made. The problem with tamaka's argument is that it is simply illogical, her conclusion simply does not follow from her premise.
Female hyenas are also biologically designed to receive and conceive, and yet the females are the dominant ones in a hyena pack, thus there is clearly no inherent relationship between dominance and being a receiver/conceiver.

The simple fact is that there is no demonstrable fact to prove a natural (as opposed to societal) inclination towards either dominance or submission in any gender, and thus it is foolish to make such a claim.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:39:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Where did i point out that i think my way is the best way exactly?

Actually, in almost every post you make dear. You may not see it, but it is there.


I don't think so. I would think that what is best for me probably isn't best at all for most people. Maybe it just sounds best to you.


Another thought regarding this. You are being disingenuous here. You have stated your belief that you fear for the future of society if submissive men are tolerated, thus you do in fact believe that what is good for you is good for all.




OsideGirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:48:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

FR
For what it is worth, all the discussion about women who are unable to conceive in no way counters the argument tamaka made. The problem with tamaka's argument is that it is simply illogical, her conclusion simply does not follow from her premise.
Female hyenas are also biologically designed to receive and conceive, and yet the females are the dominant ones in a hyena pack, thus there is clearly no inherent relationship between dominance and being a receiver/conceiver.

The simple fact is that there is no demonstrable fact to prove a natural (as opposed to societal) inclination towards either dominance or submission in any gender, and thus it is foolish to make such a claim.


I agree. Throughout history there have been matri-focused societies.

I don't think it's a gender thing. It's a personality thing.

But, I do find it irritating when people try to invalidate my relationship with M simply because they view conception as validity point.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:56:11 AM)

quote:

But, I do find it irritating when people try to invalidate my relationship with M simply because they view conception as validity point.

But nobody has tried to do so.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 10:57:12 AM)

FR
Another open question.
For those who find submissive men "weak and pathetic" or a danger to society, well how do you view dominant women?




Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 11:00:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

FR
Another open question.
For those who find submissive men "weak and pathetic" or a danger to society, well how do you view dominant women?

They were called enablers up thread




Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875