|
UllrsIshtar -> RE: slut tasks... slutty things for a baby girl to do. (12/12/2016 10:12:52 AM)
|
~FR~
Ya know, this is exactly why I don't get the whole age play/little thing AT ALL.
I mean, if somebody is a 'baby' or a 'little' with a regressed age of <10, how on Earth would they be doing 'slutty' things?
Maybe it's just me, but 'baby' and 'child' are not terms I in any way associate with 'slutty'. So playing at somebody being a young child, and then having them do adult stuff anyways is just plain weird to me, and borderline creepy.
Age play also seems to be the only type of role play with a non-adult/sexual theme which includes sex anyways. Pony players don't come here regularly to find sexy tasks for their pony. Neither do puppy players, because in both cases, ponies and puppies don't do slutty things, they do pony and puppy things instead. Yet with age players, that line of taking an adult who has a now -by virtue of the roleplay- nonsexual child's role, and sexualizing them anyways seems to be exactly the goal... and no offense, but I've got somewhat of a hard time with that.
To the point that I some times don't play in our local club when there's too many littles around. We have a somewhat regular group of littles which will get together and doing coloring books, or play with children's toys, which I'd be fine with on the surface, except that they insist that while they're in their little role, they REALLY are the age they feel they regressed to, and should be treated and addressed as such, the same way transgender are the gender they present as. But even though those littles supposedly really are children/babies at the time of the role play, they still have that same sexualization of the babies/children they're supposed to be, which I can't really manage to have my own 'sexy/slutty' time around. I just wouldn't do what I do in a dungeon around 3 year olds. Period. So if you age playing means that I should make an actual effort to see you as an actual 3 year old (instead of as an adult pretending to be a 3 year old, which would be hard enough as it is), then you just made it totally impossible for me to do anything at all I came to the dungeon to do. Add to that the sexualization and now what you've got is me seeing 3 year old (regressed adults) sexually 'abused' and somehow I'm starting to have a hard time not stepping in and interrupting the scene to 'save' them, even though what they're doing is usually super mild compared to the shit I came to the dungeon to do. [:D]
I have a hard enough time as it is why anybody would want to roleplay age play, or age regression (unlike pony or puppy play, which I totally get) but then adding overt sexualization in the mix while in age regression? I cannot wrap my head around it, nor get over my feelings of intent discomfort around it.
And I do think there is a distinction between calling an adult female 'baby' as a term of endearment while doing sexy stuff with her, versus roleplaying that said adult female is really a baby/child/regressed in age and then doing sexy stuff with her. It's the second I have a hard time with, not the first, so OP if you meant the first one (profile and post aren't clear) please understand that this is not directed at you personally.
Age players, am I totally missing something obvious on this subject that any of you care to explain? Anybody else have the same issues around age play?
|
|
|
|
