RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 8:13:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Donald Trump will still be violating the Constitution as soon as he’s sworn in

Continuance of the current Trump empire means that it will be rife with opportunities for quid pro quos and other illegalities. Most immediately, if those businesses continue to receive foreign government payments, Trump will be in violation of the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution from his first day as president.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/13/donald-trump-will-still-be-violating-the-constitution-as-soon-as-hes-sworn-in/?utm_term=.27c545d61157

So...given all the concern about legal matters in these threads . . . anyone care about this one?

It's OK if the President does it?


Hypocrite much




tamaka -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 8:17:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Donald Trump will still be violating the Constitution as soon as he’s sworn in

Continuance of the current Trump empire means that it will be rife with opportunities for quid pro quos and other illegalities. Most immediately, if those businesses continue to receive foreign government payments, Trump will be in violation of the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution from his first day as president.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/13/donald-trump-will-still-be-violating-the-constitution-as-soon-as-hes-sworn-in/?utm_term=.27c545d61157

So...given all the concern about legal matters in these threads . . . anyone care about this one?

It's OK if the President does it?


If a corporation receives money it is not the same as an individual (Trump) receiving the money. The corporation is a separate legal entity.




WhoreMods -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 8:53:52 AM)

Really? And there was me thinking that the 'States had introduced legislation that made corporations individuals in legal terms?




Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 9:19:06 AM)

Citizens United is a frequent source of double talk here.




Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 12:00:24 PM)

Trump’s Threat to the Constitution

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/opinion/trumps-threat-to-the-constitution.html?_r=0




Wayward5oul -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 12:44:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Donald Trump will still be violating the Constitution as soon as he’s sworn in

Continuance of the current Trump empire means that it will be rife with opportunities for quid pro quos and other illegalities. Most immediately, if those businesses continue to receive foreign government payments, Trump will be in violation of the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution from his first day as president.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/13/donald-trump-will-still-be-violating-the-constitution-as-soon-as-hes-sworn-in/?utm_term=.27c545d61157

So...given all the concern about legal matters in these threads . . . anyone care about this one?

It's OK if the President does it?


If a corporation receives money it is not the same as an individual (Trump) receiving the money. The corporation is a separate legal entity.


Oh geebus...




BoscoX -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 1:10:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Trump’s Threat to the Constitution

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/opinion/trumps-threat-to-the-constitution.html?_r=0


New York Times publisher vows to 'rededicate' paper to reporting honestly

THAT didn't last long.




tamaka -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 1:32:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

Really? And there was me thinking that the 'States had introduced legislation that made corporations individuals in legal terms?


Exactly... the corporation receiving the money is a separate 'Person' from Trump himself.




Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/20/2016 6:50:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Donald Trump will still be violating the Constitution as soon as he’s sworn in

Continuance of the current Trump empire means that it will be rife with opportunities for quid pro quos and other illegalities. Most immediately, if those businesses continue to receive foreign government payments, Trump will be in violation of the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution from his first day as president.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/13/donald-trump-will-still-be-violating-the-constitution-as-soon-as-hes-sworn-in/?utm_term=.27c545d61157

So...given all the concern about legal matters in these threads . . . anyone care about this one?

It's OK if the President does it?


If a corporation receives money it is not the same as an individual (Trump) receiving the money. The corporation is a separate legal entity.


Oh geebus...

Except to the Supreme Court when they want to bend election law.




Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/21/2016 6:29:02 AM)



Conflicts on top of conflicts: Another “emoluments clause” that should bar Donald Trump from office
If Congress ever wants to impeach Trump, which violation will it pick first? Another constitutional problem emerges

http://www.salon.com/2016/12/21/conflicts-on-top-of-conflicts-another-emoluments-clause-that-should-bar-donald-trump-from-office/




Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/21/2016 7:09:23 AM)

Donald Trump Has Broken the Constitution - The Atlantic

The President-Elect is a figure out of authoritarian politics, not the American tradition.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/donald-trump-has-broken-the-constitution/507146/




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875