RE: Muslim Killings (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


WickedsDesire -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 7:55:41 AM)

I think i was clear wifey5 before comrade trump sacked the attorney general - quote me his tweet particular on that one, please. Are you telling me, us all, Obama made him do it, put his wee feeble grab em by the pussy claws up to it? Before he blamed the Attorney general, a feeble women his claws have not, would not dare, grab by her pussy....from not enforcing his edict?

I think America, given its carnage rate, unto its own people should have been top of the list...anyone care to disagree?
And Saudi Arabia second - but the man has hotels and business interest in that country

I am one of the few people to have seen some of you, am I not, and rarer we spoke - you would hug my knee nicely as I thrashed you two weeks into the future - where i would be awaiting - with my kitchen sink and pots and pans to thrash you two weeks back into your present state of an incorent mess of false information and an intellect numbering bare.





vincentML -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 8:09:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

His ban list of countries came from Obama's list of most dangerous Muslims countries. Except Obama was probably using that list to monitor Muslims more closely coming from those countries. Trump simply took the simpler way and just ban them all.

So I guess Saudi wasn't on the list.

Damn, I thought this was discussed in another thread. The source of that list is the Visa Waiver Program which addressed a reciprocal arrangement which allowed people to travel visa free between the States and certain countries. The named countries were exceptions, meaning their citizens had to apply for a visa at the US Embassies. It was not an outright ban.




tweakabelle -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 8:09:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

In many places they are all gone. You are a moron if you really believe that Afghanistan, for example, which is now 99% Muslim, has always been a Muslim country. Islam only started in the middle 600s!

In some, they are still being slaughtered, and not "just" Christians and Jews. Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists, all non-Muslims - gone.

Afghanistan? 1400 years ago? What! Did it even exist?

Still being slaughtered in some? Everybody is being slaughtered in the ME, including Muslims. What is the genesis of this strife? Is it the Islamic religion? Or can it be the British betrayal of the Arabs in 1918 and again by the Balfour Declaration? could it be by the continuing colonization and suppression of Palestine by the Zionists? The overthrow of the Iranian PM by CIA and MI6 in 1953? US troops in Saudi Arabia in 1991? The US unprovoked and illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003? The relentless drone strikes this past eight years? Our current troops on the ground in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, and Somalia?

Your Islamophobia blinds you to the realities of our world.

This.

While there are occasional isolated (and indefensible) Muslim attacks on the West, usually carried out by fanatical extremists, there are DAILY attacks by the West and its proxies in the Muslim world, all of it organised by Western Govts. This has been the situation for decades. There are no Muslim country's armies in the West, yet Western armies are to be found operating in numerous Muslim countries, and using drone warfare in more.

It makes one wonder who the aggressor is ...




Greta75 -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 8:15:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

His ban list of countries came from Obama's list of most dangerous Muslims countries. Except Obama was probably using that list to monitor Muslims more closely coming from those countries. Trump simply took the simpler way and just ban them all.

So I guess Saudi wasn't on the list.

Damn, I thought this was discussed in another thread. The source of that list is the Visa Waiver Program which addressed a reciprocal arrangement which allowed people to travel visa free between the States and certain countries. The named countries were exceptions, meaning their citizens had to apply for a visa at the US Embassies. It was not an outright ban.

Which is exactly as I said. I said that Obama was using that list to monitor Muslims more closely coming from those countries. Same thing as you said. Thus the visa requirements.
Trump just chooses the easier and safer way. Ban them all until he can figure out a better way to vet them thoroughly.




vincentML -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 8:17:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Blah blah hate blah blah hilary blah blah hate blah blah obama blah blah hate blah blah liberal blah blah muslims evil blah blah hate blah blah bullshit blah blah


THATS hysterical - on a thread in which a self-loathing pile of shit like you, attacks white people in a typical communist "guilt by association" propaganda smear because ONE LOON out of hundreds of millions, goes off of the deep end IN VIOLATION OF CHRISTIAN LAW AND COMMANDS

While, when Muslims kill, they are following Muslim law and commands

Love the comedy show here [sm=sharepopcorn.gif]

Oh Fuck! Christians violate Christian Law and Commands every freakin day in the States to kill, maim, rob, and fornicate adulterously. Where else are there as many mass killers who were reared as Christians?

Fear mongering, natavist, ignorant islamophobe [:'(]




Greta75 -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 8:18:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire
Are you telling me, us all, Obama made him do it, put his wee feeble grab em by the pussy claws up to it?

I am saying. Obama felt these were dangerous Muslim immigrants. Thus he wanted them to apply for visa so that he can vet who to give visas to. He used that as his method to control these dangerous immigrants.

Trump simply took over and continue with the list that Obama provided, and chose a different method of control, by simply banning.

Different President, different method of dealing with same problem.

And since Trump believes the vetting for Visa approval is not Terrorist-Proof yet, he simply wants a halt until he can implement a better vetting system.

So it's not Trump's fault that Obama did not put in countries where Trump has businesses in. He was simply using the intelligence that Obama has gathered and what countries Obama narrowed down to. And coincidentally, which actually makes sense. It's all the most unstable Islamic countries that Trump couldn't do business in. The stable ones wouldn't be in the list.




vincentML -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 8:22:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

His ban list of countries came from Obama's list of most dangerous Muslims countries. Except Obama was probably using that list to monitor Muslims more closely coming from those countries. Trump simply took the simpler way and just ban them all.

So I guess Saudi wasn't on the list.

Damn, I thought this was discussed in another thread. The source of that list is the Visa Waiver Program which addressed a reciprocal arrangement which allowed people to travel visa free between the States and certain countries. The named countries were exceptions, meaning their citizens had to apply for a visa at the US Embassies. It was not an outright ban.

Which is exactly as I said. I said that Obama was using that list to monitor Muslims more closely coming from those countries. Same thing as you said. Thus the visa requirements.
Trump just chooses the easier and safer way. Ban them all until he can figure out a better way to vet them thoroughly.

There is no easier and safer way than requiring a process of vetting that takes more than one year while getting your visa sorted. You just can't make the world go away. Trump and Bannion are catering to the alt-right, natavist fear mongers who make up their core constituency. The fear is manufactured for political gain and only the stupid fall for it.




Greta75 -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 8:24:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
There is no easier and safer way than requiring a process of vetting that takes more than one year while getting your visa sorted. You just can't make the world go away. Trump and Bannion are catering to the alt-right, natavist fear mongers who make up their core constituency. The fear is manufactured for political gain and only the stupid fall for it.

Well, we don't know what is the new and improved vetting system yet. I guess we will find out closer to date, end of the ban, to see what kind of improvements Trump will make to the vetting process.




mnottertail -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 9:03:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire
Are you telling me, us all, Obama made him do it, put his wee feeble grab em by the pussy claws up to it?

I am saying. Obama felt these were dangerous Muslim immigrants. Thus he wanted them to apply for visa so that he can vet who to give visas to. He used that as his method to control these dangerous immigrants.

Trump simply took over and continue with the list that Obama provided, and chose a different method of control, by simply banning.

Different President, different method of dealing with same problem.

And since Trump believes the vetting for Visa approval is not Terrorist-Proof yet, he simply wants a halt until he can implement a better vetting system.

So it's not Trump's fault that Obama did not put in countries where Trump has businesses in. He was simply using the intelligence that Obama has gathered and what countries Obama narrowed down to. And coincidentally, which actually makes sense. It's all the most unstable Islamic countries that Trump couldn't do business in. The stable ones wouldn't be in the list.

Uh, no. Anyone, even our friends and allies that have ever traveled there (Englanders, Norwegians and so on), muslim or xtian, and there are xtians in those countries, were not eligible for the waiver program.




mnottertail -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 9:04:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
There is no easier and safer way than requiring a process of vetting that takes more than one year while getting your visa sorted. You just can't make the world go away. Trump and Bannion are catering to the alt-right, natavist fear mongers who make up their core constituency. The fear is manufactured for political gain and only the stupid fall for it.

Well, we don't know what is the new and improved vetting system yet. I guess we will find out closer to date, end of the ban, to see what kind of improvements Trump will make to the vetting process.

Dont know if the ban will hold since it is unconstitutional. I am sure lawsuits are in the works if xtians from those countries are let in, and muslims denied.




BoscoX -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 9:04:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Afghanistan? 1400 years ago? What! Did it even exist?



Proving your extreme ignorance, yet once again [:D]

As for the context of the violence demanded of Muslims by the Quran, it is already explained in my post above:

quote:


The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by historical context contained in the surrounding text (although many Muslims choose to think of them that way). They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subject to interpretation as anything else in the Quran.

The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God. Most contemporary Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Their apologists cater to these preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.


Ask yourself why there are so many Muslim atrocities every day of the week, if their cult doesn't demand violence

List of Islamic Terror

One white person kills six Muslims, the left screams "AHA! SEE??? ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE KILLERS!!!"

Yet in 2016, there were more than 1274 Islamic attacks in 50 countries, in which 11774 people were killed and 14303 were injured but we are to believe those people are mostly peaceful




WickedsDesire -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 9:10:47 AM)

you will call me magnificent sire from now on, or the loon with 3 cats - malady may chose and know your place at my knees in utter awe - do you know some people think i am kidding when i type stuff like that.....wicked waffle aside...i think my post was clear.

None of what you adreesed mess.

Now, he invoked this executive order - no president is above the constitution - worthless piece of garbage that it is.

So he shot down faggot Obama, a gentlemen who will not engage a feeble womens pussy with his crazed claws and yet he embraces that one in particular report from his-obama security team - which he declared as lies and deceit.....so i am deeply lost...and his next breath he sacked the attorney general for questioning the legality of it v the Americanshire Constitution

Now, i am not American this you know - and I know you are not - put you talk unadulterated steaming pish - un confuse me with your half wit




Greta75 -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 9:31:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Dont know if the ban will hold since it is unconstitutional. I am sure lawsuits are in the works if xtians from those countries are let in, and muslims denied.

The only militant organized group xtians that I can think of is The Lord's Army in Africa.

I bet if they started committing terrorism in the US or other Nations. They will be on the banned list too. Too bad they are only terrorizing their own little region in Africa to test the theory.




tamaka -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 9:47:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

In many places they are all gone. You are a moron if you really believe that Afghanistan, for example, which is now 99% Muslim, has always been a Muslim country. Islam only started in the middle 600s!

In some, they are still being slaughtered, and not "just" Christians and Jews. Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists, all non-Muslims - gone.

Afghanistan? 1400 years ago? What! Did it even exist?

Still being slaughtered in some? Everybody is being slaughtered in the ME, including Muslims. What is the genesis of this strife? Is it the Islamic religion? Or can it be the British betrayal of the Arabs in 1918 and again by the Balfour Declaration? could it be by the continuing colonization and suppression of Palestine by the Zionists? The overthrow of the Iranian PM by CIA and MI6 in 1953? US troops in Saudi Arabia in 1991? The US unprovoked and illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003? The relentless drone strikes this past eight years? Our current troops on the ground in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, and Somalia?

Your Islamophobia blinds you to the realities of our world.

quote:

he Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

Yeah, right. [8|] Put these in context with the battles that Mohammad was having with opposition forces in Mecca and you will see that they were prescriptions for the times and local events not for universal applicatiPut these in context with the battles that Mohammad was having with opposition forces in Mecca and you will see that they were prescriptions for the times and local events not for universal application. You have been drinking the kool aid of right wing extremists here and from Islamic extremists over there. You are echoing the cry of fear mongering, natavist Islamophobes. A foolish tool is what you are.



"...the Prophet’s teachings are valid and obligatory upon all of humankind. That is, his example and teaching was not simply for the people of Arabia at his time. Rather, it is just as valid and just as important for each and every Muslim today, whether he be in New York or Malaysia."




vincentML -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 1:48:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

In many places they are all gone. You are a moron if you really believe that Afghanistan, for example, which is now 99% Muslim, has always been a Muslim country. Islam only started in the middle 600s!

In some, they are still being slaughtered, and not "just" Christians and Jews. Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists, all non-Muslims - gone.

Afghanistan? 1400 years ago? What! Did it even exist?

Still being slaughtered in some? Everybody is being slaughtered in the ME, including Muslims. What is the genesis of this strife? Is it the Islamic religion? Or can it be the British betrayal of the Arabs in 1918 and again by the Balfour Declaration? could it be by the continuing colonization and suppression of Palestine by the Zionists? The overthrow of the Iranian PM by CIA and MI6 in 1953? US troops in Saudi Arabia in 1991? The US unprovoked and illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003? The relentless drone strikes this past eight years? Our current troops on the ground in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, and Somalia?

Your Islamophobia blinds you to the realities of our world.

quote:

he Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

Yeah, right. [8|] Put these in context with the battles that Mohammad was having with opposition forces in Mecca and you will see that they were prescriptions for the times and local events not for universal applicatiPut these in context with the battles that Mohammad was having with opposition forces in Mecca and you will see that they were prescriptions for the times and local events not for universal application. You have been drinking the kool aid of right wing extremists here and from Islamic extremists over there. You are echoing the cry of fear mongering, natavist Islamophobes. A foolish tool is what you are.



"...the Prophet’s teachings are valid and obligatory upon all of humankind. That is, his example and teaching was not simply for the people of Arabia at his time. Rather, it is just as valid and just as important for each and every Muslim today, whether he be in New York or Malaysia."

By whose proclamation?




heavyblinker -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 2:31:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
Everyone who knew Bissonette said he was extremely outspoken and was constantly praising and defending Trump and other far-right politicians.

Okay, so let me get this straight. Muslims who follow an Ideology that teaches them to kill infidels and actually do kill infidels, is not Islam's fault at all.


That's not what Islam teaches.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
But a Trump fan, who Trump never told any of his fans to kill Muslims, and on top of he is a Christian and Jesus definitely never told him to kill Muslims, as far as I know, the bible never show Jesus encouraging the killing of other religious groups, but it's Trump's fault.

Lib crazy logic.


He didn't tell them to kill Muslims but he actively promotes racism and xenophobia through his behavior and now through policy.




BoscoX -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 2:45:25 PM)

FR

Iranian backed suicide attackers strike Saudi ship

So... If Islam and the Koran doesn't promote violence - why are suicide attacks seemingly the norm for Muslims.

Answer? They do promote violence, obviously.

quote:



Quran

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."

Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."

Quran (2:207) - "And there is the type of man who gives his life to earn the pleasure of Allah..." This would not be in the Quran if it were not permissible.

Quran (61:10-12) "O ye who believe! Shall I lead you to a bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty? That ye believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons: That will be best for you, if ye but knew! He will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity: that is indeed the Supreme Achievement." This verse was given at the battle Uhud and uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

The dark-eyed virgins are mentioned in several places as well, including verses 44:54 and 52:20. For those who swing the other way, there are "perpetual youth" verse 6:17, otherwise known as "boys" in verses 52:24 and 76:19.

Quran (17:33) "And do not kill anyone which Allah has forbidden, for a just cause." An important verse that is used by martyrdom bombers to not only justify their own deaths, but that of other bystanders who might be believers as well. The end justifies the means, with the goal being the defeat of the kafir and the establishment of Islamic rule.
Hadith and Sira
Sahih Bukhari (52:54) - The words of Muhammad: "I would love to be martyred in Allah's Cause and then get resurrected and then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred and then get resurrected again and then get martyred." This is why modern-day Jihadists often say that they love death.

Sahih Bukhari (52:46) - "Allah guarantees that He will admit the Mujahid in His Cause into Paradise if he is killed, otherwise He will return him to his home safely with rewards and war booty."

Sahih Muslim (20:4678) - During the battle of Uhud, Muhammad was desperate to push men into battle. He promised paradise for those who would martyr themselves, prompting a young man who was eating dates to throw them away and rush to his death.

Sahih Muslim (20:4655) - A man asks Muhammad "which of men is the best?" Muhammad replies that it is the man who is always ready for battle and flies into it "seeking death at places where it can be expected." (The next most saintly man in Islam is the hermit who lives in isolation "sparing men from his mischief.")

Sahih Muslim (20:4681) - "Surely, the gates of Paradise are under the shadows of the swords." After hearing Muhammad say that martyrdom leads to paradise, a young man pulls his sword and breaks the sheath (indicating that he has no intention of returning) then flings himself into battle until he is killed.

Sahih Muslim (20.4635) - Muhammad: "Nobody who enters Paradise will (ever like to) return to this world even if he were offered everything on the surface of the earth (as an inducement) except the martyr who will desire to return to this world and be killed ten times for the sake of the great honor that has been bestowed upon him." (also Bukhari 52:53)

Sahih Muslim (55:93) - A lengthy parable told by Muhammad, in which a boy chooses to die in order to spread religion, thus legitimizing the practice.

Sahih Bukhari (64:211) - I said to Salama bin Al-Akwa`, "For what did you give the Pledge of allegiance to Allah's Messenger on the day of Al-Hudaibiya?" He replied, "For death (in the Cause of Islam.)

Jami' At-Tirmidhi, Vol. 3, No. 1663, p. 410 - Al-Miqdam bin Ma'diykarib narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: "There are six things with Allah for the martyr... he is married to seventy-two wives among Al-Huril-'Ayn [virgins] of Paradise..." This hadith verse attributes the origination of the '72 virgins' teaching to Muhammad himself.
Notes
Each week, there are about ten attempted suicide bombings - all by Muslims. The reason why these Muslims are prone to self-detonation has nothing to do with genetics, desperation or suicide. It is the ideology that promotes martyrdom by promising paradise to those who lose their lives for Allah.

A suicide bombing is really an act of homicide. When apologists in the West say that Islam is against suicide bombings by pointing to hadith that oppose killing oneself (such as Bukhari (23:446)), they are being disingenuous. Many Muslims in the Arab world, who are less concerned about public relations, celebrate and revere suicide bombers, knowing that martyrdom in battle is glorified by their religion. As the Ayatollah Khomeini put it, "The purest joy in Islam is to kill and be killed for Allah."

CAIR's Jamal Badawi, often held up as an example of moderate Islam, says "Suicide out of despair is not acceptable…Giving one’s life in a military situation is different and can be heroic if there is no other way of resisting…Killing civilians should be avoided if possible, but not everyone out of uniform is a civilian.” (Thousands of civilians are killed by suicide bombers across the globe each year).

Another prominent CAIR figure, founder Omar Ahmad, actually praised suicide bombers to a youth convention in 1999: "Fighting for freedom, fighting for Islam, that is not suicide. They kill themselves for Islam."

As for the argument that innocent Muslims are often casualties, the prominent Sunni cleric, Omar Bakri explains that "Allah will also accept as martyrs those killed by mistake."

The highly esteemed, Yousef al-Qaradawi lays out the case for suicide bombing, even when innocent Muslim civilians are affected: "Muslim clerics, or most of them, have agreed that it is permissible to kill Muslims if the army that attacks the Muslims hides behind them, that is, uses them as barricades or human shields... There was no choice but to sacrifice some [of the Muslims] in order to defend the entire [Muslim] community... Therefore, if it is permitted to kill innocent Muslims who are under coercion in order to protect the greater Muslim community, it is the more so permissible to kill non-Muslims in order to liberate the land of the Muslims from its occupiers and oppressors."

A 2014 fatwa by the mainstream OnIslam.net site states that suicide operations are actually an "obligatory form of Jihad that has nothing to do with terrorism or suicide." It quotes Sheikh Faysal Mawlawi, deputy chairman of European Council for Fatwa and Research, who calls suicide bombings "a sacred duty carried out in form of self-defense and resisting aggression and injustice. So whoever is killed in such missions is a martyr, may Allah bless him with high esteem." (The same scholar encourages "every Palestinian" to this act of violence for the sake of religion).

The Quran's version of paradise is not the ultimate communion with God that is portrayed in Christianity, but the ultimate gratification of earthly desires. Gluttony (47:15, 52:17-22, 56:18-29) and sex (44:54, 55:54-58, 55:70-77, 56:36, 78:31-33) are emphasized almost exclusively - with hints of the pleasure Muslims will have laughing at (83:34) and taunting (40:70:73) non-believers as they suffer in Hell.

While Christian theologians study spiritual transformation and moral perfection, their Muslim counterparts speak of eternal erections and the ability to eat endlessly without excretion.

There is a good reason why Islam's crude vision of the hereafter sounds like more like something a teenage boy would dream up. Muhammad was trying to inspire males of that age to sacrifice themselves in battle. His shrewd strategy of painting paradise in the most prolifically decadent terms - an endless orgy of sex, food, and aesthetic comfort - continues to motivate suicide bombers, convinced that eternal gratification lies just on the other side of martyrdom.



[Although not really a suicide bombing, the story of Amalda de Rocas is an interesting note. A Christian teenage girl, she was captured by the Turkish armies that were sent to conquer Cyprus in 1570 for no other reason than that they were not Muslim. During the campaign, the Muslims slaughtered entire towns (after promising them safe passage) and captured about 2,400 children for transport back to the robust sex slave market in Islamic Turkey.

Amalda, one of the older girls, realized the hell that awaited them, and threw a burning torch into a powder keg, blowing up the ship and sparing several hundred Christian children the indignity of sexual exploitation at the hands of the Muslims of the day.

It is probably unfair to even mention Amalda's noble and desperate act in the same breath with the homicidal mass-murder sprees of Muhammad's modern-day Fedayeen, who heap misery onto innocent people simply for the purpose of achieving a gluttonous paradise for themselves... but it is a point of interest.]

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/suicide-bombing.aspx





mnottertail -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 2:50:31 PM)

So if guns dont kill people why are there so many gun deaths in the united states? Fuck them Saudis. W left Iran the winner in his destruction of the Middle East. Fixed point in time. Thats over. Cant take that one back.




jlf1961 -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 3:10:44 PM)

Gee, Bosco, how about:

Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. John 15.

Of course there were a ton of Christian Martyrs, and we know to be a martyr, you basically have to die.

The Crusaders were 'holy' warriors, and if they died, they had a guaranteed place in heaven, all sins absolved, no chance at hell and all that.

Guess that is different because they were christians, right?




Nnanji -> RE: Muslim Killings (1/31/2017 3:15:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

How 'bout those Islamophobic Canadians, huh? [:D]

How about those hypocritical piece of shit faux christians that think this is something to be amused about.

I'm going to have to defer to your knowledge of what a piece of shit is.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875