RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


smartasawhips -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 11:17:47 AM)

There's adult language, and then there's just being a rude little boy. It'd be nice to be able to carry on an intelligent conversation, without throwing around baseless accusations and calling childish names. As a rightwing nut job, I seem capable of expressing myself without resorting to the tactics of the earlier mentioned five year olds.




Musicmystery -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 11:21:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: smartasawhips

It's the liberal left who refuse to accept that President Trump, is indeed the president. And like a bunch of five year olds, they have gone kicking and screaming and dragging their heels. It's all become about what the liberals in the House and Senate want to express on a personal level, rather than the people they are supposed to be representing. It's time to grow a set and do what's right for this country, and stop stomping feet because of hurt feelings!

Bullshit.

There's no doubt Trump is president. And there's no doubt American citizens have the right--maybe even the duty--to protest and make their voices and criticism heard.

To dismiss this is "hurt feelings" ignores reality. This election was a train wreck on both sides. That's history now. What the president is doing is front and center. And you can bet Hilary would have had lots of criticism. Or Sanders. Just as Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Bush, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Ford, Kennedy . . .




smartasawhips -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 11:31:36 AM)

Wicked, why bother to even answer your question? You'll just come up with some other really assinine names to call me. But I am like the man who was kicked by a jackass. I consider the source. But, I may consider that I have a bit of the masochist in me yet......hence, here I go. As far as I am concerned, there is ZERO difference between the left liberals, liberals, or the alt left.


By the way, I don't think that jobbie, shizo and shittery are actual words.




smartasawhips -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 11:38:15 AM)

MusicMystery,

Of course people have the right to have their voices heard , and to protest PEACEFULLY. That is their 1st amendment right. What they don't have the right to do, is destroy public or private property because they can't control themselves and act like reasonable adults.




mnottertail -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 11:56:03 AM)

Arrest those people then.
People also have the right to protect themselves, they dont have the right to go on murder rampages.
catching on?




WickedsDesire -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 12:37:29 PM)

smartasawhipsofcompleteshittery perhaps brain poverty amuses I. Fuk, you are utterly bereft of a deranged singular incompetent 1 wattage. ...a one watter - who knew they existed: you are the exception to the rule. I am simply enthralled as to how many times someone can make a complete howling cunt of themselves, and be blissfully unaware of the wreck of a human they boast to be…such is the poverty within. Sterling work indeed you bucket of jobbie poison and general clueless bint of screetching waffle.

So is it alt left, liberals, cry baby liberals? The difference, do tell me you as you commie stretched pussy, blootered with red feeble spunk froth that shat itself completely the first two times, and tries to grasp the fundamentals of I, and common sense, and my humongous cockery.




Musicmystery -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 1:05:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: smartasawhips

MusicMystery,

Of course people have the right to have their voices heard , and to protest PEACEFULLY. That is their 1st amendment right. What they don't have the right to do, is destroy public or private property because they can't control themselves and act like reasonable adults.

I don't think that's in question. And in fact, people will face legal consequences for so doing.

That's far removed from what you were claiming previously.

And, all over America, people are indeed protesting peacefully.

At one near here, marchers were even thanking the police for being out to help control traffic (and the protestors were on the sidewalks, not in the streets).




MrRodgers -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 6:57:28 PM)

The issue at hand is the hypocritical, spineless, partisan congress.

They would already be setting up committees to go after Hillary. But no, they fall right in line with Trump's fiasco actually thinking his base (now about 35% and falling) could vote them out 11/18 and all but McCain or Graham hide in their corners while even Ryan...folds like a wet suit.

As I write, they simply want Trump to rubber stamp their destruction of Soc. Sec, medicare, medicaid while adding to corp. welfare, let wall street set up TARP II, add to subsidies and the MIC and add another corp. fascist. to the SCOTUS.

After that 12/18, Trump may...may...pay a price.

Look, they don't even care what Flynn did or said, they want the leakers. Damn anybody to release shit on the repubs. What a miserable political party it is now.




smartasawhips -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 8:21:00 PM)

Wicked,

I wash my hands of Your idiocy. You don't have the ability to carry on any reasonable discussion, much less one where Your brain actually engages at all. Have a lovely weekend!




smartasawhips -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/17/2017 8:23:07 PM)

Musicmystery,

Really? People are protesting peacefully? Then things are just magically setting themselves on fire and being destroyed, right?




Musicmystery -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 7:03:10 AM)

I see the sock circus is in town.

Yes, people are protesting peacefully in many places. That there's crime here and there doesn't mean everyone is in the streets committing crime. Only morons and their socks think silly bullshit like that.




BoscoX -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 7:10:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I see the sock circus is in town.

Yes, people are protesting peacefully in many places. That there's crime here and there doesn't mean everyone is in the streets committing crime. Only morons and their socks think silly bullshit like that.


That's what you see? Then you are blind and deaf, as well as an idiot. News reports have alt left radicals:

Busting heads and committing arson, even attempted murder, blocking roads to include emergency vehicles, assassinating police officers, camping out in front of the homes of politicians as an implied threat to their families, mobbing opposition speeches and the inauguration, mobbing town halls to intimidate opposition politicians, trying to destroy one of the president's children by ruining her career, assaulting her with her babies on an airplane...

And more.




Musicmystery -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 7:11:56 AM)

Again, instances don't equal all, or even most, and if you think so, you're ridiculously stupid.




mnottertail -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 7:16:36 AM)

I know people here are unfamiliar with the concept that words have meanings in the English language, as well as the fact that there are words that actually express ideas.

Some of the imbeciles who point out an incident here and a happenstance there need to look up two words, and drill them and the resulting concept into their head.

Anecdote.
Synecdoche.

English is your friend, comrade nutsuckers.




Lucylastic -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 7:33:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: smartasawhips

Musicmystery,

Really? People are protesting peacefully? Then things are just magically setting themselves on fire and being destroyed, right?

how many have been arrested for violence, how many have been arrested for arson and destruction of property????
300? 400?
how many buildings, how many storefronts.
Its amazing how many people on the right ignore the "victims" of what is going on, will get pissy about property but not lives affected that sparked the anger.




thompsonx -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 10:05:20 AM)

ORIGINAL: smartasawhips

MusicMystery,

Of course people have the right to have their voices heard , and to protest PEACEFULLY. That is their 1st amendment right. What they don't have the right to do, is destroy public or private property because they can't control themselves and act like reasonable adults.


It would appear from the above that you have never had access to a history book written for someone beyond the fifth grade. This country started with a riot.
Google:
The boston masacre?
The boston tea party?
The civil war?
Violent protest are as amerikan as apple pie.




BoscoX -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 10:13:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: smartasawhips

Musicmystery,

Really? People are protesting peacefully? Then things are just magically setting themselves on fire and being destroyed, right?

how many have been arrested for violence, how many have been arrested for arson and destruction of property????
300? 400?
how many buildings, how many storefronts.
Its amazing how many people on the right ignore the "victims" of what is going on, will get pissy about property but not lives affected that sparked the anger.



Is your point that some violence is acceptable? You are another total idiot. If it were the other way around you would inconsolable with rage at the arson, violence and threats - death threats, rape threats etc.

Threatening, intimidating mobs hanging out in front of peoples' houses, even attacking people.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 10:52:41 AM)

swearyman even I know brains must be cleaved open with hefty sticks, and occasional, vicious, and brutal knobkerrie-ing. Evoking blunt force trauma words and word play, and, an attempt made at correcting the malnourished brain sprockets of abject poverty - festering with fake news and erratic shitery, as it gleefully boasts of its superiority minus one singular fact..blissfully unaware of what a complete fuddery it is…..

Bionic Bigfoot Fight Scene - Featuring Andre The Giant - Six Million Dollar Man https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SZMn_711s4




Lucylastic -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 12:47:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: smartasawhips

Musicmystery,

Really? People are protesting peacefully? Then things are just magically setting themselves on fire and being destroyed, right?

how many have been arrested for violence, how many have been arrested for arson and destruction of property????
300? 400?
how many buildings, how many storefronts.
Its amazing how many people on the right ignore the "victims" of what is going on, will get pissy about property but not lives affected that sparked the anger.



Is your point that some violence is acceptable? You are another total idiot. If it were the other way around you would inconsolable with rage at the arson, violence and threats - death threats, rape threats etc.

Threatening, intimidating mobs hanging out in front of peoples' houses, even attacking people.


do you have anything but strawmen, how sad.




thompsonx -> RE: Yet more outlandish, republican hypocrisy. (2/18/2017 3:46:38 PM)


ORIGINAL: BoscoX
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


Is your point that some violence is acceptable?


Is it your point that the founders did not find violence to be a useful tool in their endeavors?


Threatening, intimidating mobs hanging out in front of peoples' houses, even attacking people.

Wasn't it dumb don's possie who published the room numbers of his opposition within the party durring the convention?
Wasn't it dumb don's possie who threatened to take their guns/muskets to washington if he were not appointed president?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.589844E-02