Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Milo Uninvited


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Milo Uninvited Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/20/2017 10:47:22 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I need to know for my shoes??? Wellies or hobnail slingbacks
Make up your mind ,


My vote is for the hobnail slingbacks, a smile and nothing else.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 5:24:58 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
FR

http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2017/02/20/breitbart-employees-demand-milo-yiannopoulos-fired/

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 5:51:16 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2017/02/20/breitbart-employees-demand-milo-yiannopoulos-fired/

Shush now dcnovice.

News such this could have serious and damaging effects on poor RM's so-fragile psyche. We all know of the deep seated attraction and love that characterises the relationship between those two hot blooded young blades, Milo Y and RM.

Heaven knows, RM is in a bad enough way as it is. This could be the last thing he needs.

_____________________________



(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 5:54:39 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I need to know for my shoes??? Wellies or hobnail slingbacks
Make up your mind ,


My vote is for the hobnail slingbacks, a smile and nothing else.


She can't do that, sport: that's what Milo will be wearing.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 7:38:35 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

why dont you look at the video

or you could link me to his addressing whatever slur...
or not

have a colouring book and some glitter pens....they smell of butthurt

An out of context quote which Milo has already adequately explained? One of the ongoing intellectual manoeuvres which leftists like yourself engage in is the deliberate misinterpretation of both your enemies and your allies. So, while Milo has already clearly explained this in the context of a late teen discovering his sexuality, the wilful misrepresentation of his statements by leftists is yet another avenue of dishonest attack upon an ideological opponent.

Milo jokes a lot and deliberately triggers the Left. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows exactly what he's talking about. I watched Milo's entire discussion with Joe Rogan when it came out. At no time was he advocating padeophilia. Anyone who claims he is, is a liar. Pure and simple. And every single news organisation which reports that he's advocating paedophilia is guilty of promoting fake news. This is why we now have a crisis of confidence in the media - because the media have turned their backs on the responsibility which is expected of them as a consequence of the protections which the fourth estate enjoys.

That you happen to be a liar is no surprise. To anyone. That large-scale media organisations are liars - something highlighted during the Sanders campaign - is grave cause for concern.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 7:43:33 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Then why are the nutsuckers violating his 1st amendment rights? His pedophilia is a nutsucker 'family value'.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 7:48:08 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
Now that Milo has lost his book deal, and had his conference invitation withdrawn ( Could it happen to a nicer, more deserving guy?) is it time to have a look at all those who enabled this monster?

And should we be asking those who find Milo's defence of paedophilia a bridge too far, where were you and why were you silent when he was inciting race hate, trans hate and stoking the flames of misogyny? Isn't pandering to those who incite hate in these areas also objectionable?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/21/milo-yiannopoulos-enablers-contempt-alt-right-bigotry

Every cloud has a silver lining they say. Hopefully Milo, upon finding himself sinking to those deepest depths of obscurity and pariahdom that he so richly deserves, he will re-discover and be re-united with the minute remains of his shredded and long-ago-abandoned ethics

_____________________________



(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:05:36 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10540
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

why dont you look at the video

or you could link me to his addressing whatever slur...
or not

have a colouring book and some glitter pens....they smell of butthurt

An out of context quote which Milo has already adequately explained? One of the ongoing intellectual manoeuvres which leftists like yourself engage in is the deliberate misinterpretation of both your enemies and your allies. So, while Milo has already clearly explained this in the context of a late teen discovering his sexuality, the wilful misrepresentation of his statements by leftists is yet another avenue of dishonest attack upon an ideological opponent.

Milo jokes a lot and deliberately triggers the Left. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows exactly what he's talking about. I watched Milo's entire discussion with Joe Rogan when it came out. At no time was he advocating padeophilia. Anyone who claims he is, is a liar. Pure and simple. And every single news organisation which reports that he's advocating paedophilia is guilty of promoting fake news. This is why we now have a crisis of confidence in the media - because the media have turned their backs on the responsibility which is expected of them as a consequence of the protections which the fourth estate enjoys.

That you happen to be a liar is no surprise. To anyone. That large-scale media organisations are liars - something highlighted during the Sanders campaign - is grave cause for concern.

So CPAC and National Review are liars ?

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:06:41 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Now that Milo has lost his book deal, and had his conference invitation withdrawn ( Could it happen to a nicer, more deserving guy?) is it time to have a look at all those who enabled this monster?

And should we be asking those who find Milo's defence of paedophilia a bridge too far, where were you and why were you silent when he was inciting race hate, trans hate and stoking the flames of misogyny? Isn't pandering to those who incite hate in these areas also objectionable?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/21/milo-yiannopoulos-enablers-contempt-alt-right-bigotry

Every cloud has a silver lining they say. Hopefully Milo, upon finding himself sinking to those deepest depths of obscurity and pariahdom that he so richly deserves, he will re-discover and be re-united with the minute remains of his shredded and long-ago-abandoned ethics


While tweaker organizes her Nazi brown shirt brigade...

Salon Removes PRO-PEDOPHILIA Articles Written By Todd Nickerson From Its Website

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/salon-removes-pro-pedophilia-articles-written-todd-nickerson-website/

As I posted before - on the bright side for Milo, at least he will be welcomed at Berkley now

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:07:44 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

why dont you look at the video

or you could link me to his addressing whatever slur...
or not

have a colouring book and some glitter pens....they smell of butthurt

An out of context quote which Milo has already adequately explained? One of the ongoing intellectual manoeuvres which leftists like yourself engage in is the deliberate misinterpretation of both your enemies and your allies. So, while Milo has already clearly explained this in the context of a late teen discovering his sexuality, the wilful misrepresentation of his statements by leftists is yet another avenue of dishonest attack upon an ideological opponent.

Milo jokes a lot and deliberately triggers the Left. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows exactly what he's talking about. I watched Milo's entire discussion with Joe Rogan when it came out. At no time was he advocating padeophilia. Anyone who claims he is, is a liar. Pure and simple. And every single news organisation which reports that he's advocating paedophilia is guilty of promoting fake news. This is why we now have a crisis of confidence in the media - because the media have turned their backs on the responsibility which is expected of them as a consequence of the protections which the fourth estate enjoys.

That you happen to be a liar is no surprise. To anyone. That large-scale media organisations are liars - something highlighted during the Sanders campaign - is grave cause for concern.

So CPAC and National Review are liars ?

Everybody who disagrees with him about anything is a liar. If they weren't a liar, they'd agree with him.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:13:38 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
FR
The Right did the RIGHT thing by calling Milo out for his potential pedophilia encouragement comment. And taking action to make a strong stand that any potential encouragement of pedophilia is not acceptable. Although, I highly doubt Milo was encouraging pedophilia. But simply sharing some experiences of how some young boys found out they were gay by dabbling with older men. But I can see how his comments could encourage Pedophilia, although I do not believe that was his intention, to promote pedophilia as an acceptable practice.

I agree with Bosco that IF this was the Left. They wouldn't have done shit. Especially if it was a celebrity of the Left.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 2/21/2017 8:16:03 AM >

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:14:20 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

why dont you look at the video

or you could link me to his addressing whatever slur...
or not

have a colouring book and some glitter pens....they smell of butthurt

An out of context quote which Milo has already adequately explained? One of the ongoing intellectual manoeuvres which leftists like yourself engage in is the deliberate misinterpretation of both your enemies and your allies. So, while Milo has already clearly explained this in the context of a late teen discovering his sexuality, the wilful misrepresentation of his statements by leftists is yet another avenue of dishonest attack upon an ideological opponent.

Milo jokes a lot and deliberately triggers the Left. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows exactly what he's talking about. I watched Milo's entire discussion with Joe Rogan when it came out. At no time was he advocating padeophilia. Anyone who claims he is, is a liar. Pure and simple. And every single news organisation which reports that he's advocating paedophilia is guilty of promoting fake news. This is why we now have a crisis of confidence in the media - because the media have turned their backs on the responsibility which is expected of them as a consequence of the protections which the fourth estate enjoys.

That you happen to be a liar is no surprise. To anyone. That large-scale media organisations are liars - something highlighted during the Sanders campaign - is grave cause for concern.


You will have to link it...I havent seen it...

Teen is from 13-19...14 isnt late teen, so he wasnt a late teen, that he was molested in his own words, that he enjoyed it, isnt the problem.
I was very sexually aware from age 7. I was sucking cock at 14. I was very sexually active as a teen. I get that, totally.

It doesnt mean that the catholic priest who "taught" him how to suck cock wasnt against the law, That doesnt mean that what he "enjoyed" wasnt pedophilia.
That doesnt mean that any other teen would feel the same and it doesnt meant that its perfectly fine for any other teen.
That is the problem.
Where did I lie???
put it up

PS< CPAC is not a liberal, or progressive or leftist group. It was a con group that released the video, not the left.
Breitbart isnt liberal






_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:15:56 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
LOL, the nutsuckers want him to go to colleges and preach pedophilia to our youth, but cower when they are shown in the garish light of day as pedophiles themselves, and then violate his 1st amendment rights.

Felchgobbler Gobbles was felching the pedophile bigly, YUGELY, just the other day.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:43:13 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

Rumblings: Liberals Had Huge Scorched Earth Plan to Take Down Milo — #NeverTrumpers May Have Paid for Research

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/rumblings-liberals-huge-scorched-earth-plan-take-milo-nevertrumpers-may-paid-research/


_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:43:39 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
You will have to link it...I havent seen it...
You haven't seen it because you're not interested in facts, you're interested in censorship, slurs and smearing someone's character. Milo's statement in response can be seen on his Facebook page. You're quite capable of looking that up for yourself - I refuse to spoon-feed you and encourage your intellectual laziness.


quote:

Teen is from 13-19...14 isnt late teen, so he wasnt a late teen, that he was molested in his own words, that he enjoyed it, isnt the problem.
I was very sexually aware from age 7. I was sucking cock at 14. I was very sexually active as a teen. I get that, totally.

It doesnt mean that the catholic priest who "taught" him how to suck cock wasnt against the law, That doesnt mean that what he "enjoyed" wasnt pedophilia.
That doesnt mean that any other teen would feel the same and it doesnt meant that its perfectly fine for any other teen.
That is the problem.
Where did I lie???
put it up
Milo's jokes about his own experience are entirely his own prerogative. He has that right - like any other survivor of sexual abuse. Although, given that he's male, I'm sure you'll find a way to vilify him anyway. After all, in your world, women who are victims of sexual abuse are appparently justified in doing all sorts of things - including lying about who the perpetrator was.

quote:


PS< CPAC is not a liberal, or progressive or leftist group. It was a con group that released the video, not the left.
Breitbart isnt liberal

The video has been up on Youtube for over 6 months. Nobody "released" the video, it was publicly available. You are lazy, uninformed and stupid.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 8:56:25 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
You will have to link it...I havent seen it...
You haven't seen it because you're not interested in facts, you're interested in censorship, slurs and smearing someone's character. Milo's statement in response can be seen on his Facebook page. You're quite capable of looking that up for yourself - I refuse to spoon-feed you and encourage your intellectual laziness.


quote:

Teen is from 13-19...14 isnt late teen, so he wasnt a late teen, that he was molested in his own words, that he enjoyed it, isnt the problem.
I was very sexually aware from age 7. I was sucking cock at 14. I was very sexually active as a teen. I get that, totally.

It doesnt mean that the catholic priest who "taught" him how to suck cock wasnt against the law, That doesnt mean that what he "enjoyed" wasnt pedophilia.
That doesnt mean that any other teen would feel the same and it doesnt meant that its perfectly fine for any other teen.
That is the problem.
Where did I lie???
put it up
Milo's jokes about his own experience are entirely his own prerogative. He has that right - like any other survivor of sexual abuse. Although, given that he's male, I'm sure you'll find a way to vilify him anyway. After all, in your world, women who are victims of sexual abuse are appparently justified in doing all sorts of things - including lying about who the perpetrator was.

quote:


PS< CPAC is not a liberal, or progressive or leftist group. It was a con group that released the video, not the left.
Breitbart isnt liberal

The video has been up on Youtube for over 6 months. Nobody "released" the video, it was publicly available. You are lazy, uninformed and stupid.




oh good god, I knew you simply wouldnt link it...
just open your mouth an spew your bullshit.
No, Ive actually worked with more than a few straight AND gay men and their abuse, One, all the way up to supreme court of canada, so you can just fuck off with your accusations.
Your attempts to villify me like that is beyond pathetic, and ignorant.
but a typical dickhole response I expect from you.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 9:01:13 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
oh good god, I knew you simply wouldnt link it...
No. Like most Leftists, you like to have your opinions spoon-fed to you. You're incapable of thinking for yourself. It's time for you to start.

quote:


just open your mouth an spew your bullshit.
No, Ive actually worked with more than a few straight AND gay men and their abuse, One, all the way up to supreme court of canada, so you can just fuck off with your accusations.
Your experience is irrelevant. You're vilifying a man for the crime of joking about his own sexual abuse. You hate men and you're an abuser. It's very clear.

quote:


Your attempts to villify me like that is beyond pathetic, and ignorant.
but a typical dickhole response I expect from you.
I've characterised you correctly and appropriately. You simply lack the intelligence, intellectual honesty and perception necessary to engage in a debate about any topic which isn't Coronation Street.




_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 9:32:49 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
oh good god, I knew you simply wouldnt link it...
No. Like most Leftists, you like to have your opinions spoon-fed to you. You're incapable of thinking for yourself. It's time for you to start.

quote:


just open your mouth an spew your bullshit.
No, Ive actually worked with more than a few straight AND gay men and their abuse, One, all the way up to supreme court of canada, so you can just fuck off with your accusations.
Your experience is irrelevant. You're vilifying a man for the crime of joking about his own sexual abuse. You hate men and you're an abuser. It's very clear.

quote:


Your attempts to villify me like that is beyond pathetic, and ignorant.
but a typical dickhole response I expect from you.
I've characterised you correctly and appropriately. You simply lack the intelligence, intellectual honesty and perception necessary to engage in a debate about any topic which isn't Coronation Street.




Like most of the dumbarse dipshits here you wont link to anything and believe that you are right. And get ridiculous when you arent.
you got your talking point from facebook...but im the one that is being spoon fed?
lolololololol

My experience isnt irrelevant
sorry and all that, But I bet I have worked with more male victims of sexual abuse in person than you ever will reading online.
Im not vilifying him for his abuse, please show me where I did that?
you talk absolute slime again.

Im so not qualified to talk about coronaation street, I havent seen it in 35 years.
However I was in court with my abused male "friend" less than ten years ago. so you can go fuck yourself.
I most certainly do not hate men, only misogynist anal flaps like yourself.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 9:38:11 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
oh good god, I knew you simply wouldnt link it...
No. Like most Leftists, you like to have your opinions spoon-fed to you. You're incapable of thinking for yourself. It's time for you to start.

quote:


just open your mouth an spew your bullshit.
No, Ive actually worked with more than a few straight AND gay men and their abuse, One, all the way up to supreme court of canada, so you can just fuck off with your accusations.
Your experience is irrelevant. You're vilifying a man for the crime of joking about his own sexual abuse. You hate men and you're an abuser. It's very clear.

quote:


Your attempts to villify me like that is beyond pathetic, and ignorant.
but a typical dickhole response I expect from you.
I've characterised you correctly and appropriately. You simply lack the intelligence, intellectual honesty and perception necessary to engage in a debate about any topic which isn't Coronation Street.




Like most of the dumbarse dipshits here you wont link to anything and believe that you are right. And get ridiculous when you arent.
you got your talking point from facebook...but im the one that is being spoon fed?
lolololololol
No, you fucking moron, I got the STATEMENT from the Facebook profile of the very guy you're fucking vilifying, you thick-as-pig-shit bint. Christ, how the fuck do you live with a mind that incompetent?

quote:

My experience isnt irrelevant
sorry and all that, But I bet I have worked with more male victims of sexual abuse in person than you ever will reading online.
Im not vilifying him for his abuse, please show me where I did that?
you talk absolute slime again.
He joked about his abuse, you claim his joke advocates paedophilia. You're engaging in a collective vilification of a political opponent by promoting a lie.

quote:

Im so not qualified to talk about coronaation street, I havent seen it in 35 years.
Suuuuuure you haven't. *drily* Because someone with your esteemed character is clearly above petty gossip.

quote:


However I was in court with my abused male "friend" less than ten years ago. so you can go fuck yourself.
I most certainly do not hate men, only misogynist anal flaps like yourself.
"I'm a good person because I went to court with someone who suffered!!!! I'm amazing!"

You're a fucking victim-hood leech engaging in self-aggrandising self-promotion on the back of people who've actually suffered. You are fucking disgusting.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Milo Uninvited - 2/21/2017 9:48:48 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Now that Milo has lost his book deal, and had his conference invitation withdrawn ( Could it happen to a nicer, more deserving guy?) is it time to have a look at all those who enabled this monster?

And should we be asking those who find Milo's defence of paedophilia a bridge too far, where were you and why were you silent when he was inciting race hate, trans hate and stoking the flames of misogyny? Isn't pandering to those who incite hate in these areas also objectionable?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/21/milo-yiannopoulos-enablers-contempt-alt-right-bigotry

Every cloud has a silver lining they say. Hopefully Milo, upon finding himself sinking to those deepest depths of obscurity and pariahdom that he so richly deserves, he will re-discover and be re-united with the minute remains of his shredded and long-ago-abandoned ethics


While tweaker organizes her Nazi brown shirt brigade...

Salon Removes PRO-PEDOPHILIA Articles Written By Todd Nickerson From Its Website

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/salon-removes-pro-pedophilia-articles-written-todd-nickerson-website/

As I posted before - on the bright side for Milo, at least he will be welcomed at Berkley now

What has your post got to do with either (i) this thread or (ii) my post? As far as I can tell the answer is nothing in both cases.

Milo's current predicament has absolutely nothing to do with whatever the content of Salon magazine or its website is. Nor does Salon's content have any bearing on anything I put in my post.

Your argument seems to be one of the more childish arguments available - Salon did X action, therefore all leftists do X action, therefore RWNJs like me can do Y action. So you are just raving away as usual. No relevance, no evidence relating to the topic, no logical connections, not even an organised sensible sentence/argument structure - just the incoherent babbling of an hysterical looney RWNJ who has long ago lost the plot.

You need professional help aqap. Nurse! Triple his meds!

_____________________________



(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Milo Uninvited Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.107