bounty44
Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: longwayhome I don't need to get into an evidence competition with you, especially since your evidence mainly comprises internet opinion and all you are saying is that you remain unconvinced by what I have written. how very convenient for you, especially when you provide no evidence, and then relegate the evidence ive provided as "internet opinion" as opposed to synopses of actual studies. you are the only one providing "opinion." the only "body of research" that seems to disagree requires redefining the phrase "wage gap" in ways that make it other than a true "wage gap." you might do well to figure out something else to call it. quote:
"In fact, when researchers try to control for these differences, the wage gap virtually disappears. "A recent Glassdoor study that made an honest attempt to get beyond the superficial numbers showed that after controlling for age, education, years of experience, job title, employer, and location, the gender pay gap fell from nearly twenty-five cents on the dollar to around five cents on the dollar. In other words, women are making 95 cents for every dollar men are making, once you compare men and women with similar educational, experiential, and professional characteristics." "When we examined pay gaps by grade level for the GS population, we found that there was no significant gap between female and male salaries. However, more females were found in lower grades, which may be a reflection of differences in occupational distribution.[5] " "Many economists have examined how the pay gap changes after controlling for factors that influence pay. Most studies find that observable characteristics explain a large portion of the apparent gap in pay between male and female workers—with differences in occupation and experience having the largest effect. " "Farrell argues that comparable males and females have been earning similar salaries for decades, though the press has yet to notice. As long ago as the early 1980s, he writes, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics found that companies paid men and women equal money when their titles and responsibilities were the same." "Accounting for several observable characteristics shows women with the same skills and doing the same jobs as men are paid almost the same amount. Including other factors would probably further shrink the remaining difference. An apples-to-apples comparison shows women earn almost as much—and quite possibly just as much—as men for doing the same work. Aggregate differences in pay reflect different choices made by individual men and women." and on and on and on... those look like "opinions" to you, or conclusions from studies? quote:
•Men go into technology and hard sciences more than women. •Men tend to take more stressful jobs that are not "nine-to-five." •Men are more likely to work longer hours, and the pay gap widens for every hour past 40 per week. •Women are more likely to have "gaps" in their careers, primarily because of child rearing and child care. Less experience means lower pay. those look like "opinions" or results of studies? that look like sexism to you or choices people make? this is all very reminiscent of the title ix arguments when it comes to "equal representation" in sport, and how the radical feminists simply cannot accept that men and women are different when it comes to athletic participation and that women don't value it as much as men do. last try---if you have evidence of structural sexism that disadvantages women in terms of their pay, all else being equal, then share it. if you have evidence of structural sexism that disadvantages women in terms of the jobs they choose, then share that.
< Message edited by bounty44 -- 3/9/2017 2:48:16 AM >
|