Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/28/2017 10:54:04 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

I may be mistaken, but I don't think he blew up that building with a gun.

I don't think so either. But he also doesn't seem to have been deterred by an armed citizenry.


I will give you that one.

Of course no one figured some guy would blow up a federal building with a truck bomb in the US.

On a side note, I just got the letter from ATF....


I have been granted approval to finish putting a WW2 Browning Automatic Rifle back to firing capability and my 1919 30 cal stinger (belt fed 30 cal machine gun with BAR stock.)

Long story short, I can legally order the new receivers and bolts.

Too bad I cant legally hunt hogs with them.


so are you just ill infomred or are you another propganda whore like the 3 stooges out here?





Commissions conclusions

The commission concluded that “federal, state, county and city officials were obviously given some kind of warning prior to the bombing,” but “how specific that warning was, we do not know.”

The report said the warning could have been “a general alert to be more vigilant,” as some government agencies have said and — with some agencies — “this may be true.”

“But with other government entities, the threat seems to have been more specific,” the commission said. “The presence of the bomb squad in the downtown area that morning and the page to the ATF agents telling them to not come into the office supports this conclusion.”

“We question why government agencies have tried to quash these reports,” the commission’s report said, as well as why those same agencies “have provided disinformation and have tried to discredit the witnesses. …”





MORE:




And now, even the new OKC museum contradicts the official theory of what happened on April 19.

Officials in charge at the time still refuse to discuss anything other than the manufactured spin: McVeigh and Nichols, as convicted by the courts, mixed up a large batch of ammonium nitrate fuel oil (ANFO—a mild explosive used by farmers to blow out stumps) and demolished several square blocks of downtown Oklahoma City with a devastating blast that could be heard miles away.

In reality, the ANFO story was born only 10 minutes after the blast when a high-ranking BATF official by the name of Harry Everhart witnessed the blast from nearby and called the BATF office in Dallas to excitedly announce, “Someone has just blown up the federal building in Oklahoma City with a truckload of ANFO!”

Some reporters and investigators, who have looked objectively at the bombing, now argue that neither Everhart nor anyone else could have correctly deduced in such a short time exactly what caused the explosion.

According to government documents released later, Ever hart was experienced in loading large amounts of ammonium nitrate fertilizer into a vehicle for use as a terrorist truck bomb, and his presence in the midst of the second worst terrorist attack in U.S. history looms suspicious to this day.

Records indicate that this ANFO explosives expert and his associates had destroyed at least eight vehicles in “test bombing experiments” at a secret range in the New Mexico desert in the 12 months prior to the OKC bombing.

Everhart and his fellow specialists even photographed and videotaped these truck bombs as they detonated.

Far from an anti government militia member, the vehicle bomb expert was Special Agent Everhart, an employee of the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms. And, according to federal government records obtained later, Everhart had been instrumental in obtaining the government funding to perform the ANFO bombing tests.

Everhart served on the National Response Team (NRT), a group of experienced bomb and arson investigators who respond to major bombing crime scenes throughout the United States.

He also served on a secret government project in 1994 that conducted tests using ANFO and C-4 to blow up cars and vans in a classified U.S. government experiment known as “Project Dipole Might.”

According to files, reports and photographs obtained from the Department of the Treasury through a Freedom of Information Act request, the U.S. government initiated a “comprehensive ANFO and C-4 vehicle bomb testing program” about a year before the OKC bombing. Records show the project was supervised and administered by the BATF, but was actually funded through a National Security Council (NSC) directive.

The Department of Treasury has confirmed the project was initiated under President Bill Clinton’s NSC staff shortly after he took office in 1993.

The intent of the Dipole Might experiments in 1994 includes making videos and computer models to “be displayed in a courtroom to aid in the prosecution of defendants” in vehicle bomb cases, according to government documents. The exact precedent and purpose of this activity is unclear. BATF agents started blowing up vans and cars in the spring of 1994 at the White Sands Missile Range in order to collect test data for post-blast forensics computer software packages to be issued out to National Response Team personnel when they respond to truck bombings.

Why the NSC would fund such a BATF project—despite the rarity of the crime—has not been explained.

Nor has it been explained as to what specific threat-assessment information the government had when it decided to engage in such a project, just a few months before officials claimed a Ryder truck laden with ammonium nitrate fertilizer exploded in front of the Murrah building.

The only major ANFO vehicle bombing in U.S. history, prior to OKC, occurred in August 1970 at the University of Wisconsin, in Madison, Wis.

Contrary to media reports, the World Trade Center bomb of February 1993 was composed of urea nitrate, not ANFO, according to the FBI.

Despite only one known case in almost 25 years, why did Clinton’s NSC anticipate a need for detailed information regarding ANFO vehicle bomb attacks a few months prior to the Oklahoma City blast?

Treasury’s own official documents reveal the intensity of interest. In fact, a brief summary of “Project Dipole Might” is featured in BATF’s 1994 Annual Report to Congress.

There were enough clandestine characters hanging around Oklahoma City to fill a James Bond movie during the days prior to the crime.

BATF’s paid informant Carol Howe had provided information that the Murrah building was one of three potential targets.

On April 6, Cary Gagan gave U.S. marshals in Denver the information that “a federal building would be blown up in either Denver or Oklahoma City within two weeks.” He had not only personally delivered timers and blasting caps to a Middle Eastern group, but had sat in on a meeting where the blueprints of the Murrah Building were on display.

Then, 38 minutes before the blasts on April 19, the Department of Justice in Washington received an anonymous telephone call warning that the Murrah Building was about to be blown up but took no action.

After a morning of reporting that “multiple bombs” had been found in the Murrah debris—a report publicly confirmed by the Gov. Frank Keating—and that rescue operations had been halted for two hours while these unexploded bombs were removed, news people suddenly began to spin the government yarn about an ANFO bomb being responsible for the enormous damage.

One of the problems with that theory was the fact that the columns remained standing directly across the sidewalk from the truck as opposed to those that had collapsed more than 50 feet away. A retired air force brigadier general with 30 years experience compiled an irrefutable report on this subject, which showed exactly where the charges were placed inside the building.

It was so irrefutable that the prosecution refused to allow him to testify at the Denver trial as it would have destroyed any ANFO theory that the government had already sold to the American people.

On May 23, 1995, only 34 days after the explosions, the federal government stonewalled all attempts to examine the building’s remaining structure and carried out an ordered
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/okc_bombshell.html


what a bunch of propaganda whores on this board.


nobody imagined anyone would fly a plane into the world trade center either


I certainly couldnt imagine it





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/28/2017 10:59:27 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 2:07:20 AM   
HaveRopeWillBind


Posts: 514
Joined: 7/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

what a bunch of propaganda whores on this board.


nobody imagined anyone would fly a plane into the world trade center either


I certainly couldnt imagine it





The author Tom Clancy imagined it in his 1994 book, "Debt of Honor." In which the plot involved flying a 747 into the Capitol building during a joint session of Congress. He even pointed out in that novel that pound for pound jet fuel has more explosive potential than Dynamite. After 9/11 members of the attack team who were not aboard the aircraft and therefore survived, freely admitted that Clancy's novel was the inspiration for their method of attack. Afterward Clancy did not write for some time.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 3:01:02 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: HaveRopeWillBind


The author Tom Clancy imagined it

Tom clancy also imagined that a revolver had a thumb safety.



in his 1994 book, "Debt of Honor." In which the plot involved flying a 747 into the Capitol building during a joint session of Congress. He even pointed out in that novel that pound for pound jet fuel has more explosive potential than Dynamite.


No it does not.


After 9/11 members of the attack team who were not aboard the aircraft and therefore survived, freely admitted that Clancy's novel was the inspiration for their method of attack.

Cite please.


Afterward Clancy did not write for some time.

Bullshit


The Hunt for Red October (1984)
. Red Storm Rising (1986)
Patriot Games (1987)
The Cardinal of the Kremlin (1988)
Clear and Present Danger (1989)
The Sum of All Fears (1991)
Without Remorse (1993)
Debt of Honor (1994)
Executive Orders (1996)
Strategies for Submarine Warfare (1996)
Rainbow Six (1998)
Red Rabbit (2002)
Teeth of the Tiger (2003)
Dead or Alive (2010,
Against All Enemies (2011,
Locked On (2011,
Search and Destroy (2012,
Threat Vector (2012,
Command Authority (2013,



(in reply to HaveRopeWillBind)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 4:07:02 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Real0ne fleet of drones...cars trucks aside.

Yes Masterbrentc here it is http://www.collarchat.com/m_5013364/tm.htm


London attack: Who was Khalid Masood?

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 7:49:21 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD


On one hand gun control is not even relevant to terrorism,

What crime statutes are the accessories to the san bernardino terrorist attack being prosecuted under?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 10:34:31 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD


On one hand gun control is not even relevant to terrorism,

What crime statutes are the accessories to the san bernardino terrorist attack being prosecuted under?


Gun control does absolutely nothing to deter terrorism. It doesn't stop them, it doesn't keep them from getting weapons. The only effect it has is creating kill zones (or as the left calls them "gun free zones") to gather more helpless people in one place.


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 10:47:39 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: BamaD
ORIGINAL: thompsonx



On one hand gun control is not even relevant to terrorism,

What crime statutes are the accessories to the san bernardino terrorist attack being prosecuted under?


Gun control does absolutely nothing to deter terrorism.

I never said they did dumbass. That is your ignorant way of deflecting the discussion down a dirt road. Laws have the effect of punishing one after the fact not stoping the act.
Laws against murder do nothing to deter murders.
Laws against stealing do nothing to deter stealing.
Laws against you making stupid statements do nothing to prevent you from saying stuplid shit.
Answer the question I posted dumbass.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 12:02:59 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: BamaD
ORIGINAL: thompsonx



On one hand gun control is not even relevant to terrorism,

What crime statutes are the accessories to the san bernardino terrorist attack being prosecuted under?


Gun control does absolutely nothing to deter terrorism.

I never said they did dumbass. That is your ignorant way of deflecting the discussion down a dirt road. Laws have the effect of punishing one after the fact not stoping the act.
Laws against murder do nothing to deter murders.
Laws against stealing do nothing to deter stealing.
Laws against you making stupid statements do nothing to prevent you from saying stuplid shit.
Answer the question I posted dumbass.


Murder.

I told you that if you returned to incivility it would lead to putting you on hide. It has bye.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 4:48:44 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: BamaD
ORIGINAL: thompson



On one hand gun control is not even relevant to terrorism,

What crime statutes are the accessories to the san bernardino terrorist attack being prosecuted under?


Gun control does absolutely nothing to deter terrorism.

I never said they did dumbass. That is your ignorant way of deflecting the discussion down a dirt road. Laws have the effect of punishing one after the fact not stoping the act.
Laws against murder do nothing to deter murders.
Laws against stealing do nothing to deter stealing.
Laws against you making stupid statements do nothing to prevent you from saying stuplid shit.
Answer the question I posted dumbass.


Murder.

I told you that if you returned to incivility it would lead to putting you on hide. It has bye.


It apprears that the 'alligator' has run out of balls.
This is what you always do when you are confronted with inconvenient facts.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 5:13:33 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
FR

I hope nobody's having a go at guns on this thread. The words 'Guns' and 'freedom' mean exactly the same thing - and they're both lovely!

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 3/29/2017 5:15:10 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

I hope nobody's having a go at guns on this thread. The words 'Guns' and 'freedom' mean exactly the same thing - and they're both lovely!


Someone has found the vickers brandy stash

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire - 4/1/2017 4:52:44 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

I may be mistaken, but I don't think he blew up that building with a gun.

I don't think so either. But he also doesn't seem to have been deterred by an armed citizenry.



Or the fact that bombs were illegal at the time

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 92
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Yet another Gun nut runs amok in Americashire Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.539