quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: InfoMan


idealistically - it would also include aiding and abetting because it allows the city to provide illegals medical and financial support through healthcare and welfare, and theoretically it could also cover accessory and obstruction of justice because they are willingly not enforcing Federal Law, making them partially responsible for anything illegal that is done by those illegals.


Do you have a cite for this ignorant shit or do you just make it up as you go along?

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: InfoMan




8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324

do you just spout 'cite' and baseless insults as your go along?
seriously you haven't really contributed anything to the discussion.


My insultrs are not baseless. You have a history of posting bullshit.
You have no clue what you are talking about.
Thus far in this discussion I have pointed out your ignorance.
There are federal felonies and federal misdomeanors. You do not seem to know the difference.
The federal government requiring local law enforcement to work without compensation is unconstitutional.
You have stated other wise and I have asked you to provide validation. Thus far you have failed to do so.

quote:

In the 70's, when they dropped the speed limit to 55 Federal funding was withheld from states that didn't comply. Any public program that knowingly supports illegal alien could lose its funding. There is know comparison between no going along with a program which openly promotes violating the law.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

quote:

In the 70's, when they dropped the speed limit to 55 Federal funding was withheld from states that didn't comply. Any public program that knowingly supports illegal alien could lose its funding. There is know comparison between no going along with a program which openly promotes violating the law.

Yup, and Nevada told them to stick it up their ass, kinda. Going over 55 you got a ticket for "wasting energy" and it was like ten bucks and not s moving violation.

But anyway, if they want to be sanctuary cities, let them. Send all the immigrants and refugees and whatever else other countries empty out of their prisons.

Then they will learn and there might be some real conservatives again. Ever hear the phrase "If it ain't broke don't fix it" ? Then liberals come along and want to fix everything, they say they can do better. Yup some thirty year old yuppie straight out of college which is a liberal indoctrination center, knows better than the people who really built this country, and world in fact.

So these liberals, for some stupid reason that I am NEVER going to understand, just want to let people in the country. What the fuck ? You almost can't go anywhere in this world without some money, or maybe a job sponsor like on an H1B visa, or their equivalent.

I was pretty sure congress was given the power to control immigrtion but now I am not so sure. But if states have control, then Texas and Arizona have ever right to shoot anyone who crosses that lie.

It is one or the other.

Bottom line, let their officials let in every MF from anywhere, and when the place turns to hell, the government gets lynched. Problem solved, well part of it.

T^T

quote:

The Department of Homeland Security released its weekly “Declined Detainer Outcome Report,” which shines a spotlight on sanctuary cities where local police have released illegal immigrants even though federal authorities requested that they be detained until Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents can come get them.

The latest report, which covers February 4-10, shows that contrary to the myth sanctuary city proponents peddle—that those released are nonviolent—dozens who were released have been convicted of violent crimes, such as sexual assault, domestic battery, and cruelty toward children.

In total, ICE issued 2,825 detainer requests across the U.S. and 47 were declined.

quote:

Although cities and counties in New York and California accounted for nearly half of the refusals, communities in Colorado, Florida, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, Texas, Virginia, Washington and the District of Columbia also made the list.

The new report also highlights jurisdictions that have recently declared themselves sanctuary cities. Since January, Baltimore, Tulare, Calif.; Ithaca, N.Y.; Travis County, Texas; Iowa City, Iowa; and Boulder, Colo., have publicly announced their intentions to not honor ICE detainers.

The report noted that ICE field offices have been instructed to continue issuing detainers on all removable aliens in law enforcement custody regardless of prior non-cooperation. As a result, the report states, the number of issued detainers will increase over the next several reporting periods.

The report comes days after Attorney General Jeff Sessions threatened to pull federal funding from cities that refuse to comply with federal immigration law.

“Such policies cannot continue," he said Monday. "They make our nation less safe by putting dangerous criminals back on the street."

quote:

"New DHS Report Reveals Sanctuary Cities Are Releasing Violent Criminal Aliens"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Those who commit violent crimes are imprisoned and/or deported. Problem solved.

Next.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

"New DHS Report Reveals Sanctuary Cities Are Releasing Violent Criminal Aliens"

So, there were 47 declines out of 2825 detention requests. That works out to be a rate of 1.66% Is that what all the fuss is about? 1.66% noncompliance within a public sector bureaucracy? Looked at from the other side = 98.34% compliance. I wonder if the headline isn't over inflated. I should think that little punk ass Jeff Sessions would be grateful for that much cooperation.

quote:

Of the 47, 17 were convicted of felonies. Are we to believe that these convicted felons were simply set free? Where is the evidence for that?

Sometimes public agencies have been known to release news bulletins to suit their own particular agenda. Is Jeff Sessions lying just a little bit? The RW used to rail at the dishonesty of Washington. Now, they want us to accept the government's pronouncements as gospel. The times they are a changing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD


Problem not solved, violent criminals who are deported just come back


What is your solution?