RE: LGBTK? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:39:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

She's just pissed because I met you in real life and I deleted her BS email unread.



I am not pissed that you deleted my email unread. I don't get pissed over nonsense like that.

And why would i be pissed that you met Lucy? That makes no sense.

The fact that you think that is rather absurd.




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:48:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them.
And you have no idea about my strength of character...
none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives)
WIthout proof, without cause and without truth


Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood.


again, but you have zero proof, no back up, no nothing, im sorry, but you have nothing, will never have anything but willful ignorance.
you are so sad and lacking in credibility about me, female dominants or my posts.
as your past 8 posts to me have proven.






Like i said before, which you don't seem to grasp, the way you represent yourself here day in and day out confirms what i am saying. I understand your ignorance makes you uncapable of seeing it. There's nothing i can do to help you with that.


Ive been posting here for 10 years, Im not changing because you cannot handle my english idioms, syntax or expressions.
This forum is just a pleasure for me, not business, not legal, not academic, not strict. You have not shown one speck of anything to prove your dumb ignorance. Again
Its really pointless, but as you want to play silly games so bad. no matter your response, I will continue to seek some fact amongst your sad attempts.
I cant accept your opinion as valid because of what you are. Willfully ignorant.



I didn't expect any more from you.




Lucylastic -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:50:22 PM)

I didnt expect anything better from you, you are piss poor at proving your ass umptions




LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:50:26 PM)

Then, why did you bother to write me???







LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:51:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I didnt expect anything better from you, you are piss poor at proving your ass umptions

No!! *She* has an M/s dynamic that has lasted a whole year!!!




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:52:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I didnt expect anything better from you, you are piss poor at proving your ass umptions

No!! *She* has an M/s dynamic that has lasted a whole year!!!



It's a new relationship. How is your stalker relationship going?




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:53:49 PM)

Is that relevant???




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:54:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Then, why did you bother to write me???




You should have read the email if you wanted to know.






tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:56:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

Is that relevant???



Sure. If she wants to criticize my relationships, i can discuss hers.




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:00:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I didnt expect anything better from you, you are piss poor at proving your ass umptions


ass umptions... such a foolish thing you are.




LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:08:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I didnt expect anything better from you, you are piss poor at proving your ass umptions

No!! *She* has an M/s dynamic that has lasted a whole year!!!



It's a new relationship. How is your stalker relationship going?


Do you mean the stalker that you and other people supported???

It's going quite well, thank you. I probably haven't had an 'in person' encounter in a year.. just the stupid online shit.

However, why are you treating me any differently than any other person who has been the recipient of a criminal assault?



Your slip is showing!!




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:09:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

Is that relevant???



Sure. If she wants to criticize my relationships, i can discuss hers.

Stalking or being on the receiving end is NOT a relationship.
Your question is not relevant.
In fact, it's rather repugnant.




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:10:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I didnt expect anything better from you, you are piss poor at proving your ass umptions

No!! *She* has an M/s dynamic that has lasted a whole year!!!



It's a new relationship. How is your stalker relationship going?


Do you mean the stalker that you and other people supported???

It's going quite well, thank you. I probably haven't had an 'in person' encounter in a year.. just the stupid online shit.

However, why are you treating me any differently than any other person who has been the recipient of a criminal assault?



Your slip is showing!!



I never supported anyone. Great job you did there with that relationship you dominated. How quickly did you have to go running to hubby for help?

I don't wear slips.

And every time you 'play' with someone would be considered a criminal assault. Burning and cutting and beating people... not good.




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:12:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

Is that relevant???



Sure. If she wants to criticize my relationships, i can discuss hers.

Stalking or being on the receiving end is NOT a relationship.
Your question is not relevant.
In fact, it's rather repugnant.



No, it's totally relevant. If you can't handle the heat... well, you know.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:18:46 PM)

It's apples and oranges.

Stalking isn't a relationship.
So to compare it with a relationship is a non sequitur strawman argument.


Edited for spelling.




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:23:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

It's apples and oranges.

Stalking isn't a relationship.
So to compare it with a relationship is a non-sequateur strawman argument.


No... it was her relationship that she dominated that turned into a total fiasco for her. She needs to step up to the plate and take responsibility. Now please, let this 'dominant woman' handle this herself. Or do you sense she needs your help? I mean, this is just a simple online interaction. Do you think it's too much for her?




Lucylastic -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:25:57 PM)

If you cant handle the heat, You lie, over and over and over.
You attacked me for not looking after my husband, (while he was in the hospital getting a chemo treatment, )
not knowing the first fucking thing about it.
Ive never attacked your relationship, or your orientation
Just your lies and ignorance.
YOU cant handle the heat, you had to take a week or so off....
mandated?
I ask because the posts are gone.




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:28:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

If you cant handle the heat, You lie, over and over and over.
You attacked me for not looking after my husband, (while he was in the hospital getting a chemo treatment, )
not knowing the first fucking thing about it.
Ive never attacked your relationship, or your orientation
Just your lies and ignorance.
YOU cant handle the heat, you had to take a week or so off....
mandated?
I ask because the posts are gone.



I haven't lied at all.




LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:32:59 PM)

No one by Dominance alone, can do this.

To answer your question... Three years. Took me three years for me to 'ask hubby' for help.

AND, I was wrong.

If I ever had the chance back, made a different decision... I'd have done that. Had I just taken that opportunity...

If I, my family, my community and gotten those three years back...




tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 7:34:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

No one by Dominance alone, can do this.

To answer your question... Three years. Took me three years for me to 'ask hubby' for help.

AND, I was wrong.

If I ever had the chance back, made a different decision... I'd have done that. Had I just taken that opportunity...

If I, my family, my community and gotten those three years back...



Karma is a bitch, isn't she?

And boy... you are a slow learner, aren't you?




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875