RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/4/2017 7:53:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic bless your heart, its strange because in the last month, the scrotus has just sunk himself, his tweets, his obvious lies, his own leaks, yet you believe this is all one man, not trump, but Bezos? or hillary...or obama... It would be more interesting, if you actually had anything to debunk the MSM "lies" You have nothing then [:D] You are just another typical leftist idiot sucking that 1% asshole no, its you that has nothing, no debunk, no evidence its bullshit, this grand jury will weigh out, soon. Like the other one will. Im anti 1% always have been so please go suck yourself a bigger dick. I do wonder if there is anything the ooze can do that will change your "loyalty" so what evidence have you got, about hillary, about obama being guilty , and about trump being innocent.????anything????, no nothing!!!!...as usual

WickedsDesire -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/4/2017 8:08:47 AM)
You are all effluent, and the stench is minging from the lot of you stinky pants

bigjb62 -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/4/2017 10:36:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 FR I'm glad Mueller convened a Grand Jury, now we'll see just how much heat the Dems will take when the investigation turns to President Obama. After all, Obama was the President when all of this so called Russian election interference took place. What exactly did the former President do to stop the Russians from interfering? Remember that investigations have a way of turning on the hand that holds the leash. Since the leftist are in bed with Mueller and Mueller is controlling which way the investigation goes. Why would the "Dems" have anything to worry about from this grand jury? On the other hand, if the Justice Department opened more investigations into what Clinton, Obama, and just about every other democrat on the hill have done, then we would see some proof of wrong doing and some actual "heat" put on the biggest & boldest crooks in government.

mnottertail -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/4/2017 10:50:58 AM)
why are the left always in bed with the nutsuckers? all these nutsuckers, comey, mueller, rosenstein, the nutsucker congress they are out to get themselves, I dont think the left is sleeping around with these retards.

MrRodgers -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/4/2017 11:52:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: outlier What will be interesting about the process of this bill is to see who votes for and against. This is going to be a clear indication of how much the members of congress are willing to stick out their necks to protect Trump. Are they loyal to Trump or to the party or to the law? We shall see. The law? You are insane. Mueller is a close personal friend of Jim Comey... Which says it all. The entire "TRUMP!!! RUSSIA!!!!!! [sm=tongue_smiley34.gif]" scam is nothing more than Hillary people making excuses for why their pussyhat party keeps losing And yes, a lot of establishment Republicans would hate to see their gravy train come to an end too Being a friend of Comey means nothing. I am sure W looked for a real liberal democrat to appt. to Dir. FBI. (2001-2013) There would be almost no news if there weren't such repub scandals as we've seen since Nixon. Which repub trash er...establishment will hate to see their 'gravy train' come to an end ? The grand jury will now get down to the real business of bringing in charges. I am sure soon as need be, the jury will be a bunch of leftist cronies too.

MrRodgers -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/4/2017 11:59:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX FR We all know that the Obama administration and the Clintons committed obvious crimes - does anyone care? Leftists (especially leftists in the media) only care about crimes (real or imaginary) by politicians if Republicans are accused Not a charge let alone conviction on the dems but we 'just know' they are all guilty of 'obvious crimes.' But evidence accumulating, grand jury now formed and you and the rightist media still claim this is all a hoax while there is nothing imaginary about it at all.

Musicmystery -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/4/2017 5:46:13 PM)
At least he acknowledged the possibility the crimes are real.

tweakabelle -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/5/2017 3:36:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Could you imagine leftist trash in the House or Senate holding an Obama or a Hillary on a short leash, despite all of their massive, ugly, and REAL scandals It will never happen - those Nazis march in lockstep They never allowed any real investigations into their REAL crimes to begin with As usual, BoscoX's ideology has clouded his judgement and caused severe memory failures. The Clinton Presidency was probably the most investigated Presidency ever, with no charges against the Clintons ever arising from any of the multiple investigations. For instance, the Senate's Whitewater investigation: "The Whitewater committee's hearings were much more extensive than those held previously by the Democrats, running for 300 hours over 60 sessions across 13 months, and taking over 10,000 pages of testimony and 35,000 pages of depositions from almost 250 people." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy#The_Kenneth_Starr_investigation There was also special prosecutor Starr's investigation, which likewise resulted in no Whitewater charges being laid against the Clintons. The House also initiated an investigation, with similar results. And Bosco is telling us that there were no "REAL investigations" against the Clintons ... Go figure. 15 people were convicted of crimes in connection with the Whitewater affair. While the Clintons were never charged, tried or convicted of anything, it certainly wasn't for lack of trying or investigating. Whatever the colour of your politics, it is simply a lie to claim that there were never "any real investigations" into their ~~REAL~~alleged crimes.

BoscoX -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/5/2017 5:03:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Could you imagine leftist trash in the House or Senate holding an Obama or a Hillary on a short leash, despite all of their massive, ugly, and REAL scandals It will never happen - those Nazis march in lockstep They never allowed any real investigations into their REAL crimes to begin with As usual, BoscoX's ideology has clouded his judgement and caused severe memory failures. The Clinton Presidency was probably the most investigated Presidency ever, with no charges against the Clintons ever arising from any of the multiple investigations. For instance, the Senate's Whitewater investigation: "The Whitewater committee's hearings were much more extensive than those held previously by the Democrats, running for 300 hours over 60 sessions across 13 months, and taking over 10,000 pages of testimony and 35,000 pages of depositions from almost 250 people." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy#The_Kenneth_Starr_investigation There was also special prosecutor Starr's investigation, which likewise resulted in no Whitewater charges being laid against the Clintons. The House also initiated an investigation, with similar results. And Bosco is telling us that there were no "REAL investigations" against the Clintons ... Go figure. 15 people were convicted of crimes in connection with the Whitewater affair. While the Clintons were never charged, tried or convicted of anything, it certainly wasn't for lack of trying or investigating. Whatever the colour of your politics, it is simply a lie to claim that there were never "any real investigations" into their ~~REAL~~alleged crimes. You're a moron I wrote Hillary, clearly referring to the tarmac meeting where Obama sent his lackey to cut a deal over her 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2207 violations You're talking about rapist Bill's presidency

WhoreMods -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/5/2017 5:08:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Could you imagine leftist trash in the House or Senate holding an Obama or a Hillary on a short leash, despite all of their massive, ugly, and REAL scandals It will never happen - those Nazis march in lockstep They never allowed any real investigations into their REAL crimes to begin with As usual, BoscoX's ideology has clouded his judgement and caused severe memory failures. The Clinton Presidency was probably the most investigated Presidency ever, with no charges against the Clintons ever arising from any of the multiple investigations. For instance, the Senate's Whitewater investigation: "The Whitewater committee's hearings were much more extensive than those held previously by the Democrats, running for 300 hours over 60 sessions across 13 months, and taking over 10,000 pages of testimony and 35,000 pages of depositions from almost 250 people." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy#The_Kenneth_Starr_investigation There was also special prosecutor Starr's investigation, which likewise resulted in no Whitewater charges being laid against the Clintons. The House also initiated an investigation, with similar results. And Bosco is telling us that there were no "REAL investigations" against the Clintons ... Go figure. 15 people were convicted of crimes in connection with the Whitewater affair. While the Clintons were never charged, tried or convicted of anything, it certainly wasn't for lack of trying or investigating. Whatever the colour of your politics, it is simply a lie to claim that there were never "any real investigations" into their ~~REAL~~alleged crimes. You're a moron I wrote Hillary, clearly referring to the tarmac meeting where Obama sent his lackey to cut a deal over her 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2207 violations You're talking about rapist Bill's presidency You know, if you don't like people calling your ~~orange blob of shit~~boy a pedophile, you should probably knock it off with the rapist talk about Clinton.

BoscoX -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/5/2017 5:10:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods You know, if you don't like people calling your ~~orange blob of shit~~boy a pedophile, you should probably knock it off with the rapist talk about Clinton. It doesn't matter (or it shouldn't matter) to most normal people, what kind of garbage and stupidity lowlife trash like you spews

WhoreMods -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/5/2017 5:14:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods You know, if you don't like people calling your ~~orange blob of shit~~boy a pedophile, you should probably knock it off with the rapist talk about Clinton. It doesn't matter (or it shouldn't matter) to most normal people, what kind of garbage and stupidity lowlife trash like you spews [img]http://68.media.tumblr.com/f518f90b80e566216005a9d471217f67/tumblr_moeha83A5l1qhigt0o4_250.gif[/img]

mnottertail -> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump (8/5/2017 7:50:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX You're a moron I wrote Hillary, clearly referring to the tarmac meeting where Obama sent his lackey to cut a deal over her 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2207 violations You're talking about rapist Bill's presidency She violated the presidential records act? You have any credible citations, or do you mean Il Douchovitch raping 13 year olds? See, the Douchester is not a real nutsucker, or it would have been a boy in that motel room.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875