RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/4/2017 7:53:09 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

bless your heart,
its strange because in the last month, the scrotus has just sunk himself, his tweets, his obvious lies, his own leaks, yet you believe this is all one man, not trump, but Bezos?
or hillary...or obama...

It would be more interesting, if you actually had anything to debunk the MSM "lies"

You have nothing then

You are just another typical leftist idiot sucking that 1% asshole

no, its you that has nothing, no debunk, no evidence its bullshit, this grand jury will weigh out, soon.
Like the other one will.
Im anti 1% always have been so please go suck yourself a bigger dick.
I do wonder if there is anything the ooze can do that will change your "loyalty"

so what evidence have you got, about hillary, about obama being guilty , and about trump being innocent.????anything????, no nothing!!!!...as usual

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/4/2017 8:08:47 AM

WickedsDesire

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

You are all effluent, and the stench is minging from the lot of you stinky pants

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/4/2017 10:36:50 AM

bigjb62

Posts: 124
Joined: 11/23/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR

I'm glad Mueller convened a Grand Jury, now we'll see just how much heat the Dems will take when the investigation turns to President Obama. After all, Obama was the President when all of this so called Russian election interference took place. What exactly did the former President do to stop the Russians from interfering?

Remember that investigations have a way of turning on the hand that holds the leash.

Since the leftist are in bed with Mueller and Mueller is controlling which way the investigation goes. Why would the "Dems" have anything to worry about from this grand jury?
On the other hand, if the Justice Department opened more investigations into what Clinton, Obama, and just about every other democrat on the hill have done, then we would see some proof of wrong doing and some actual "heat" put on the biggest & boldest crooks in government.

(in reply to subrob1967)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/4/2017 10:50:58 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

why are the left always in bed with the nutsuckers? all these nutsuckers, comey, mueller, rosenstein, the nutsucker congress they are out to get themselves, I dont think the left is sleeping around with these retards.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to bigjb62)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/4/2017 11:52:49 AM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: outlier

What will be interesting about the process of this bill
is to see who votes for and against. This is going to
be a clear indication of how much the members of
congress are willing to stick out their necks to protect
Trump.

Are they loyal to Trump or to the party or to the law?
We shall see.

The law? You are insane. Mueller is a close personal friend of Jim Comey... Which says it all.

The entire "TRUMP!!! RUSSIA!!!!!! " scam is nothing more than Hillary people making excuses for why their pussyhat party keeps losing

And yes, a lot of establishment Republicans would hate to see their gravy train come to an end too

Being a friend of Comey means nothing. I am sure W looked for a real liberal democrat to appt. to Dir. FBI.
(2001-2013)

There would be almost no news if there weren't such repub scandals as we've seen since Nixon.

Which repub trash er...establishment will hate to see their 'gravy train' come to an end ?

The grand jury will now get down to the real business of bringing in charges. I am sure soon as need be, the jury will be a bunch of leftist cronies too.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/4/2017 11:59:36 AM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

FR

We all know that the Obama administration and the Clintons committed obvious crimes - does anyone care?

Leftists (especially leftists in the media) only care about crimes (real or imaginary) by politicians if Republicans are accused

Not a charge let alone conviction on the dems but we 'just know' they are all guilty of 'obvious crimes.'

But evidence accumulating, grand jury now formed and you and the rightist media still claim this is all a hoax while there is nothing imaginary about it at all.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/4/2017 5:46:13 PM

Musicmystery

Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

At least he acknowledged the possibility the crimes are real.

(in reply to MrRodgers)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/5/2017 3:36:41 AM

tweakabelle

Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Could you imagine leftist trash in the House or Senate holding an Obama or a Hillary on a short leash, despite all of their massive, ugly, and REAL scandals

It will never happen - those Nazis march in lockstep

They never allowed any real investigations into their REAL crimes to begin with

As usual, BoscoX's ideology has clouded his judgement and caused severe memory failures.

The Clinton Presidency was probably the most investigated Presidency ever, with no charges against the Clintons ever arising from any of the multiple investigations. For instance, the Senate's Whitewater investigation:
"The Whitewater committee's hearings were much more extensive than those held previously by the Democrats, running for 300 hours over 60 sessions across 13 months, and taking over 10,000 pages of testimony and 35,000 pages of depositions from almost 250 people."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy#The_Kenneth_Starr_investigation
There was also special prosecutor Starr's investigation, which likewise resulted in no Whitewater charges being laid against the Clintons. The House also initiated an investigation, with similar results. And Bosco is telling us that there were no "REAL investigations" against the Clintons ... Go figure.

15 people were convicted of crimes in connection with the Whitewater affair. While the Clintons were never charged, tried or convicted of anything, it certainly wasn't for lack of trying or investigating.

Whatever the colour of your politics, it is simply a lie to claim that there were never "any real investigations" into their ~~REAL~~alleged crimes.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 8/5/2017 3:46:25 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/5/2017 5:03:47 AM

BoscoX

Posts: 11371
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Could you imagine leftist trash in the House or Senate holding an Obama or a Hillary on a short leash, despite all of their massive, ugly, and REAL scandals

It will never happen - those Nazis march in lockstep

They never allowed any real investigations into their REAL crimes to begin with

As usual, BoscoX's ideology has clouded his judgement and caused severe memory failures.

The Clinton Presidency was probably the most investigated Presidency ever, with no charges against the Clintons ever arising from any of the multiple investigations. For instance, the Senate's Whitewater investigation:
"The Whitewater committee's hearings were much more extensive than those held previously by the Democrats, running for 300 hours over 60 sessions across 13 months, and taking over 10,000 pages of testimony and 35,000 pages of depositions from almost 250 people."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy#The_Kenneth_Starr_investigation
There was also special prosecutor Starr's investigation, which likewise resulted in no Whitewater charges being laid against the Clintons. The House also initiated an investigation, with similar results. And Bosco is telling us that there were no "REAL investigations" against the Clintons ... Go figure.

15 people were convicted of crimes in connection with the Whitewater affair. While the Clintons were never charged, tried or convicted of anything, it certainly wasn't for lack of trying or investigating.

Whatever the colour of your politics, it is simply a lie to claim that there were never "any real investigations" into their ~~REAL~~alleged crimes.

You're a moron

I wrote Hillary, clearly referring to the tarmac meeting where Obama sent his lackey to cut a deal over her 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2207 violations

You're talking about rapist Bill's presidency

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to tweakabelle)

Profile

Post #: 29

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/5/2017 5:08:29 AM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Could you imagine leftist trash in the House or Senate holding an Obama or a Hillary on a short leash, despite all of their massive, ugly, and REAL scandals

It will never happen - those Nazis march in lockstep

They never allowed any real investigations into their REAL crimes to begin with

As usual, BoscoX's ideology has clouded his judgement and caused severe memory failures.

The Clinton Presidency was probably the most investigated Presidency ever, with no charges against the Clintons ever arising from any of the multiple investigations. For instance, the Senate's Whitewater investigation:
"The Whitewater committee's hearings were much more extensive than those held previously by the Democrats, running for 300 hours over 60 sessions across 13 months, and taking over 10,000 pages of testimony and 35,000 pages of depositions from almost 250 people."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy#The_Kenneth_Starr_investigation
There was also special prosecutor Starr's investigation, which likewise resulted in no Whitewater charges being laid against the Clintons. The House also initiated an investigation, with similar results. And Bosco is telling us that there were no "REAL investigations" against the Clintons ... Go figure.

15 people were convicted of crimes in connection with the Whitewater affair. While the Clintons were never charged, tried or convicted of anything, it certainly wasn't for lack of trying or investigating.

Whatever the colour of your politics, it is simply a lie to claim that there were never "any real investigations" into their ~~REAL~~alleged crimes.

You're a moron

I wrote Hillary, clearly referring to the tarmac meeting where Obama sent his lackey to cut a deal over her 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2207 violations

You're talking about rapist Bill's presidency

You know, if you don't like people calling your ~~orange blob of shit~~boy a pedophile, you should probably knock it off with the rapist talk about Clinton.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 30

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/5/2017 5:10:42 AM

BoscoX

Posts: 11371
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

You know, if you don't like people calling your ~~orange blob of shit~~boy a pedophile, you should probably knock it off with the rapist talk about Clinton.

It doesn't matter (or it shouldn't matter) to most normal people, what kind of garbage and stupidity lowlife trash like you spews

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to WhoreMods)

Profile

Post #: 31

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/5/2017 5:14:10 AM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

You know, if you don't like people calling your ~~orange blob of shit~~boy a pedophile, you should probably knock it off with the rapist talk about Clinton.

It doesn't matter (or it shouldn't matter) to most normal people, what kind of garbage and stupidity lowlife trash like you spews

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 32

RE: Bipartisan Moves To Protect Mueller From Trump - 8/5/2017 7:50:35 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

You're a moron

I wrote Hillary, clearly referring to the tarmac meeting where Obama sent his lackey to cut a deal over her 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2207 violations

You're talking about rapist Bill's presidency

She violated the presidential records act? You have any credible citations, or do you mean Il Douchovitch raping 13 year olds? See, the Douchester is not a real nutsucker, or it would have been a boy in that motel room.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 33