DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Made2Obey It's not that people object to Kaepernick voicing his opinion, that IS well within his rights as a citizen, no one is arguing against that. The problem is that he chose to do so in an inappropriate venue. Football should not be politicized. Much in the same manner that actors who choose to use their acceptance speech at the Oscars or Emmys should leave it to a more appropriate time and place. Kaepernick may have been making a point, but in doing so he was hurting football. Ever since he chose to politicize the game, whether for valid reasons or not, the ratings, attendance, and profits for the NFL have dropped significantly. The very game paying him millions of dollars has been harmed directly by his actions. There's no mystery as to why he hasn't been hired. If he was the best player in the league, (and he isn't even close) he would still be unemployed by the NFL as he has cost them more than he will ever be worth. It's not a message, it's economics. Kapaernick has every right to protest whenever, however, or wherever he chooses. He also has the responsibility to accept whatever comes from that protest. If an NFL owner doesn't want him on his team, that's the owner's choice. I have a friend on Facebook (which is the only reason we're connected) that has, once again, refused to watch the NFL because of protests have been allowed by his team by one or member of the team (Malcolm Jenkins of the Philadelphia Eagles). As a former Navy serviceman, he is offended by the protests.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|