quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Anyway, back to the topic -- the point is that Arpaio was at war with the judiciary, and that's the attraction for Trump.

Having a president open attack and flaunt one branch of government is courting trouble.

At some point, he and the courts are likely to hit a stand-off, i.e., constitutional crisis.

That's what makes this pardon different from other controversial pardons.

I see... By pardoning that harmless old man who is a personal friend for a misdemeanor, the evil Nazi Russian robot president has destroyed the rule of law, like only an evil Nazi Russian robot can do... [:D]

Love your childish imagination btw, three-year-olds are cute

Remember when Obama really did openly attack and flaunt the constitution, and the other branches of government in ways that really were dangerous to the rule of law?

Obama is defying the Constitution on war - The Washington Post

Obama Administration Admits It Violated Judge's Order

Obama accused of defying court on drilling ban

Top 10 Ways Obama Violated The Constitution During His Presidency - The Obama administration has been the most lawless in U.S. history. Here are just a few examples to prove it.

Obama Defies Congress, Issues No-Deportation Order

Pardon one old man for a misdemeanor though... And it's the end of civilization as we know it

You drama queens really need to pull your heads out of your asses

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR
The hypocrisy of the left once again astounds me, for 8 years President Obama blamed everything under the sun on President Bush and the left not only agreed with him, they took up the cry and defended him.

Here we are not even a year out of Obama's second term, and the left throws a hissy fit every time someone brings up the past 8 years.

The economic crash and both wars were on Bush because they were his fault.
Note there was no economic crash during Obama's tenure and he made a sincere attempt to de-escalate the war.

'The people' rejected Obama's immigration policies out of ignorance-- that is the only way to describe anyone who seriously thinks terror and/or a fucking wall is a solution.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Anyway, back to the topic -- the point is that Arpaio was at war with the judiciary, and that's the attraction for Trump.

Having a president open attack and flaunt one branch of government is courting trouble.

At some point, he and the courts are likely to hit a stand-off, i.e., constitutional crisis.

That's what makes this pardon different from other controversial pardons.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

No, there are not going to be two standards by which we judge presidents.

One standard for all.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

No, there are not going to be two standards by which we judge presidents.

One standard for all.

I'm delighted to hear you say that " there are not going to be two standards by which we judge presidents. One standard for all" Bosco.

I recall you lambasting Obama for taking a golfing holiday every time he took a day or two off work. So precisely when can we look forward to you holding Trump to the exact same standard and lambasting him for his regular and (compered to Obama) lengthy golfing breaks each and every time he takes one?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

No, there are not going to be two standards by which we judge presidents.

One standard for all.

I'm delighted to hear you say that " there are not going to be two standards by which we judge presidents. One standard for all" Bosco.

I recall you lambasting Obama for taking a golfing holiday every time he took a day or two off work. So precisely when can we look forward to you holding Trump to the exact same standard and lambasting him for his regular and (compered to Obama) lengthy golfing breaks each and every time he takes one?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Anyway, back to the topic -- the point is that Arpaio was at war with the judiciary, and that's the attraction for Trump.

Having a president open attack and flaunt one branch of government is courting trouble.

At some point, he and the courts are likely to hit a stand-off, i.e., constitutional crisis.

That's what makes this pardon different from other controversial pardons.

Certainly Arpaio was at war with the Obama Justice department. But then, according to Holder, his people, didn't include white males did it?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

There's just so much that I can choose from. Let me see...let me see. Okay, let's just do one. Say...the judge who was on the council for the Hispanic racist hate group "La Raza". Translated directly to "The Race". Which, subsequently after having been outed nationally changed its name because donations started falling off. Now just assume you're a Hispanic in court for whatever reason and you find out your white judge is on the council of an organization named...oh you choose..."White Men"..."White Race"..."The Congressional White Caucus"...Or taught at a University in the "White Male Studies" program. Are you going to tell me you don't think that Hispanic guy should question the judge on bias?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

No, there are not going to be two standards by which we judge presidents.

One standard for all.

I'm delighted to hear you say that " there are not going to be two standards by which we judge presidents. One standard for all" Bosco.

I recall you lambasting Obama for taking a golfing holiday every time he took a day or two off work. So precisely when can we look forward to you holding Trump to the exact same standard and lambasting him for his regular and (compered to Obama) lengthy golfing breaks each and every time he takes one?

Conservatives pointed to the hypocrisy after leftists went howling mad over President Bush's golfing for eight years

Context matters

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Anyway, back to the topic -- the point is that Arpaio was at war with the judiciary, and that's the attraction for Trump.

Having a president open attack and flaunt one branch of government is courting trouble.

At some point, he and the courts are likely to hit a stand-off, i.e., constitutional crisis.

That's what makes this pardon different from other controversial pardons.

I see... By pardoning that harmless old man who is a personal friend for a misdemeanor, the evil Nazi Russian robot president has destroyed the rule of law, like only an evil Nazi Russian robot can do... [:D]

Love your childish imagination btw, three-year-olds are cute

Remember when Obama really did openly attack and flaunt the constitution, and the other branches of government in ways that really were dangerous to the rule of law?

Obama is defying the Constitution on war - The Washington Post

Obama Administration Admits It Violated Judge's Order

Obama accused of defying court on drilling ban

Top 10 Ways Obama Violated The Constitution During His Presidency - The Obama administration has been the most lawless in U.S. history. Here are just a few examples to prove it.

Obama Defies Congress, Issues No-Deportation Order

Pardon one old man for a misdemeanor though... And it's the end of civilization as we know it

You drama queens really need to pull your heads out of your asses

There's just so much that I can choose from. Let me see...let me see. Okay, let's just do one. Say...the judge who was on the council for the Hispanic racist hate group "La Raza". Translated directly to "The Race". Which, subsequently after having been outed nationally changed its name because donations started falling off. Now just assume you're a Hispanic in court for whatever reason and you find out your white judge is on the council of an organization named...oh you choose..."White Men"..."White Race"..."The Congressional White Caucus"...Or taught at a University in the "White Male Studies" program. Are you going to tell me you don't think that Hispanic guy should question the judge on bias?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Anyway, back to the topic -- the point is that Arpaio was at war with the judiciary, and that's the attraction for Trump.

Having a president open attack and flaunt one branch of government is courting trouble.

At some point, he and the courts are likely to hit a stand-off, i.e., constitutional crisis.

That's what makes this pardon different from other controversial pardons.

I see... By pardoning that harmless old man who is a personal friend for a misdemeanor, the evil Nazi Russian robot president has destroyed the rule of law, like only an evil Nazi Russian robot can do... [:D]

Love your childish imagination btw, three-year-olds are cute

Remember when Obama really did openly attack and flaunt the constitution, and the other branches of government in ways that really were dangerous to the rule of law?

Obama is defying the Constitution on war - The Washington Post

Obama Administration Admits It Violated Judge's Order

Obama accused of defying court on drilling ban

Top 10 Ways Obama Violated The Constitution During His Presidency - The Obama administration has been the most lawless in U.S. history. Here are just a few examples to prove it.

Obama Defies Congress, Issues No-Deportation Order

Pardon one old man for a misdemeanor though... And it's the end of civilization as we know it

You drama queens really need to pull your heads out of your asses

There's just so much that I can choose from. Let me see...let me see. Okay, let's just do one. Say...the judge who was on the council for the Hispanic racist hate group "La Raza". Translated directly to "The Race". Which, subsequently after having been outed nationally changed its name because donations started falling off. Now just assume you're a Hispanic in court for whatever reason and you find out your white judge is on the council of an organization named...oh you choose..."White Men"..."White Race"..."The Congressional White Caucus"...Or taught at a University in the "White Male Studies" program. Are you going to tell me you don't think that Hispanic guy should question the judge on bias?

Can't do it this way and you know it. Once a judge, then he's held only to the same standards as every other judge.

His background otherwise and race having making distinction in getting a judgeship, then his rulings deserve no public ridicule as the a final impartial arbiter jsame as all of the right wing, racist, capitalist fascists judges.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Exactly when did obama publicly pardon anyone before they had been sentenced for the offense they had been found guilty of????

quote:

t isnt always Left or Right

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR
The hypocrisy of the left once again astounds me, for 8 years President Obama blamed everything under the sun on President Bush and the left not only agreed with him, they took up the cry and defended him.

Here we are not even a year out of Obama's second term, and the left throws a hissy fit every time someone brings up the past 8 years.

The economic crash and both wars were on Bush because they were his fault.
Note there was no economic crash during Obama's tenure and he made a sincere attempt to de-escalate the war.

'The people' rejected Obama's immigration policies out of ignorance-- that is the only way to describe anyone who seriously thinks terror and/or a fucking wall is a solution.

You just keep saying that. Once you lefties get all the statues you can officially go after the history books. You'll be a hero for your mumsey.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Oh poor thing. Butthurt and ignit. Oh well, sorry for you.