You can only have a positive response to humiliation if you are conflicted about your sexuality.
I don't really agree. It has nothing to do with that. But anything can be positive or humiliating depending on context. Even penetrative missionary sex can be humiliating. Even a french kiss can be humiliating. It's how it's framed. But there are things in sex, that if a man turn against you, when things sour, that they would have ammunition against you than other things in sex, so..., I believe for example, BJ is one of the biggest one.
And anyway, for me, I've just seen too many men who are angels when they love you, but fucking nasty when things sour and you break up. So for me, I am just very wary of who I play "humiliation" play with. I enjoy "humiliation" play as it would be all part of the "rape fantasies". I mean, what kind of rapist doesn't humiliate? And also consensual non-consensual plays. I seldom view someone playing in a consensual non-consensual role as a sweet and loving man. Sweet loving men don't play "non-consensual" role plays.
And I see no purpose in being with someone who truly believes I’m lying, cheating, worthless, etc.
That's a bit weird. You know, none of these words have ever been used in my humiliation plays.
My humiliation plays is more about a man making me cum when I said no to sex. (Of course he ignores the "Nos" and only stops when safe words are used)
The Humiliation comes from cumming despite not wanting sex with that person. Maybe more about "lying" that I don't want him?