RE: Improving Reply Rates (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message

Spellbinder83 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/18/2017 4:47:03 PM)

ORIGINAL: cloverodella
ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83
quote:


Frankly, I doubt the ones responding to that are actually women, but rather men posing as women to get their rocks off. Odds are they'll ask for money or never meet you IRL no matter how much they claim to want to.


She's real. She stopped talking to me and logged off as soon as I mentioned rewards.

quote:

Also, it's silly to take the advice of the one dominant man replying in this thread because it's what you want to hear. The women responding to the thread are the s-types you want to attract. You should be listening to them. But what do I know? I'm just submissive lady who would question a guy who says isn't experienced yet decides to call himself a master.

I'd listen to others if they would comment. Most here are subs. I'm looking for slaves. I did take their advice. It didn't work. I admit that at first I appeared intransient. I also made changes to my profile. This earned me a comliment and a friend today. And sincerely, what should I call myself?



Greta75 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/18/2017 6:56:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloverodella
Frankly, I doubt the ones responding to that are actually women, but rather men posing as women to get their rocks off. Odds are they'll ask for money or never meet you IRL no matter how much they claim to want to.



Yea, generally, that is the case. The ones who play along with "harsher words" usually don't turn out to be authentic. If OP managed to find a real person and engage in real life through his "harsher words" experiment. OP, Do let us know, and update on Positive experiences in this forum.

As notice LTE example of his real life example approach was still, he was saying nice things and trying to build rapport by telling her he agrees with her on whatever she wrote on her profile and he feels he is looking for the same things.



Greta75 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/18/2017 10:00:16 PM)

OP, I also do agree that your picture makes you look more like a submissive male than a dominant male. Base on the one you have in this forum.

You have a lovely smile and look like a friendly guy. I think that would work great for a vanilla site. But a picture looking more serious to place in this site might also make a difference.



Spellbinder83 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 8:48:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloverodella
Frankly, I doubt the ones responding to that are actually women, but rather men posing as women to get their rocks off. Odds are they'll ask for money or never meet you IRL no matter how much they claim to want to.



Yea, generally, that is the case. The ones who play along with "harsher words" usually don't turn out to be authentic. If OP managed to find a real person and engage in real life through his "harsher words" experiment. OP, Do let us know, and update on Positive experiences in this forum.

As notice LTE example of his real life example approach was still, he was saying nice things and trying to build rapport by telling her he agrees with her on whatever she wrote on her profile and he feels he is looking for the same things.

I'd post the convo, but CS has been down all day. If the person is either of those two, I don't know why they would bolt when I mention rewards. I'd stick around and try to scam me or jerk-off.



Spellbinder83 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 10:55:56 AM)


Spellbinder83 on 10/17/17 at 5:12 PM:
So you don't want rewards. What do you want? Extra beatings?
Spellbinder83 on 10/17/17 at 4:58 PM:
Do you deserve rewards?
Spellbinder83 on 10/17/17 at 4:44 PM:
Great. There's a bit of a commute for the things you like to do. I'm sure we can fit that in as a reward.
cuffedchika on 10/17/17 at 4:34 PM:
I dont see any deal breakers
Spellbinder83 on 10/17/17 at 4:28 PM:
I do not want to waste your time. Read my profile and let me know if there are any deal-breakers.
cuffedchika on 10/17/17 at 4:25 PM:
Sure
Spellbinder83 on 10/17/17 at 4:19 PM:
With a hitachi?
cuffedchika on 10/17/17 at 4:16 PM:
Love to be teased
Spellbinder83 on 10/17/17 at 4:00 PM:
Okay. I guess i'll tease you around your hole. I'm mean like that. We can gladly do mouth only.
cuffedchika on 10/17/17 at 3:56 PM:
Good, I sure do
Spellbinder83 on 10/17/17 at 3:47 PM:
Hey Chika, how are you? I love bj's. I knew I loved them before I had one. Do you really want to deny yourself?

(Her profile doesn't have much, but it does request that she be restricted to oral sex only.)



OsideGirl -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 11:05:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83

ORIGINAL: cloverodella
ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83
quote:


Frankly, I doubt the ones responding to that are actually women, but rather men posing as women to get their rocks off. Odds are they'll ask for money or never meet you IRL no matter how much they claim to want to.


She's real. She stopped talking to me and logged off as soon as I mentioned rewards.


Until you meet face to face - you won't know if "she's" real.

quote:

Also, it's silly to take the advice of the one dominant man replying in this thread because it's what you want to hear. The women responding to the thread are the s-types you want to attract. You should be listening to them. But what do I know? I'm just submissive lady who would question a guy who says isn't experienced yet decides to call himself a master.

I'd listen to others if they would comment. Most here are subs. I'm looking for slaves. I did take their advice. It didn't work. I admit that at first I appeared intransient. I also made changes to my profile. This earned me a comliment and a friend today. And sincerely, what should I call myself?


You do realize that the difference between "sub" and "slaves" is a matter of opinion, right? You're acting like there's some sort of standard test that makes that determination. There isn't. It's all about the individual, not the title. You also seem to think that "sub" or "slave" is determined by sexual acts.

While you might be getting more responses, you're most likely not getting quality responses. You're appealing to the men posing as women and the fantasists. You just had a bunch of S type women who are in successful relationships, your target audience, tell you what they find appealing.

But, hey, come back in a month and tell us how many you've actually met in real life.





Spellbinder83 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 11:44:18 AM)

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83

ORIGINAL: cloverodella
ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83
quote:


You do realize that the difference between "sub" and "slaves" is a matter of opinion, right?

I thought they were very different.
quote:

You're acting like there's some sort of standard test that makes that determination. There isn't. It's all about the individual, not the title. You also seem to think that "sub" or "slave" is determined by sexual acts.

No, just level of involvement in the lifestyle.
quote:

While you might be getting more responses, you're most likely not getting quality responses. You're appealing to the men posing as women and the fantasists. You just had a bunch of S type women who are in successful relationships, your target audience, tell you what they find appealing.

I'd continue to use their advice, but I tried it and had zero success. So I tried LTE's style. Yes, I've had scammers, but I've also had a few real women. And believe it or not, one lists hair pulling under dislikes.
quote:

But, hey, come back in a month and tell us how many you've actually met in real life.

Probably zero. Hell, I doubt i will walk in a month. Are you rooting for me to fail?



ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 11:54:23 AM)

Hey dickwad, did you have her permission to post that to the public forum?



ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 11:56:35 AM)

quote:

I thought they were very different.

yeah, well guess what, you were wrong.

quote:

No, just level of involvement in the lifestyle.

Guess what? You're wrong again.



LadyPact -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 12:06:27 PM)

<FR>

Dude, here's the thing.

You're probably messed up. You crave control because you don't have any in your own life due to the stroke.






stef -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 12:18:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83

Probably zero. Hell, I doubt i will walk in a month. Are you rooting for me to fail?

I think she's rooting for you to get a clue.



OsideGirl -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 12:33:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83


I thought they were very different.
They're subjective terms. Period.
quote:


No, just level of involvement in the lifestyle.
Well, I live in a TPE 24/7 relationship and I label myself as sub. So, your opinion doesn't fit me.

quote:

Yes, I've had scammers, but I've also had a few real women.
And again...until you meet face to face - you have no idea if it's female or "real".

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83

Probably zero. Hell, I doubt i will walk in a month. Are you rooting for me to fail?

I think she's rooting for you to get a clue.


Bingo!








LadyPact -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 12:46:11 PM)

OMG!! People are listening to Artie on the forum now!!!




Spellbinder83 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 1:03:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Hey dickwad, did you have her permission to post that to the public forum?

No. She logged and hasn't spoken to me. Since you're so upset, I'm guessing you think she's real. And that was very rude. You people have subjected me to a lot of abuse and I don't resort to name-calling. You were new at some point.



Spellbinder83 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 1:10:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

<FR>

Dude, here's the thing.

You're probably messed up. You crave control because you don't have any in your own life due to the stroke.


My mind is fine. I crave control because I got a taste and enjoyed it. Otherwise, I wouldn't be here.



stef -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 1:13:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

OMG!! People are listening to Artie on the forum now!!!

Maybe they're mesmerized by his juggs?



stef -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 1:16:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Spellbinder83

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Hey dickwad, did you have her permission to post that to the public forum?

No. She logged and hasn't spoken to me. Since you're so upset, I'm guessing you think she's real. And that was very rude.

Less rude than dragging them into this drama without their permission. It speaks volumes to your integrity, or lack thereof.

quote:

You people have subjected me to a lot of abuse and I don't resort to name-calling. You were new at some point.

You people?



OsideGirl -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 1:19:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

OMG!! People are listening to Artie on the forum now!!!



Yeah, that was my thought too.



Spellbinder83 -> RE: Improving Reply Rates (10/19/2017 1:20:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef
Less rude than dragging them into this drama without their permission. It speaks volumes to your integrity, or lack thereof.

I made a mistake.
quote:


You people?

Don't apologize for your language.



Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.2724609