RE: NBC Fires Lauer

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: NBC Fires Lauer

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: NBC Fires Lauer

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/3/2017 2:00:22 PM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Please stop demonstrating you're ignorant of US discrimination and harassment laws. Please?

You say it's ignorant, but if you read even more deeply into the FAQ. They talk about the whole procedure where if they don't agree with you, it's serious enough to be harassment, it will be dismiss.
It seems to allow for "minor harassment". And the example that I gave will definitely be deemed as minor. But makes it a very uncomfortable and hostile environment for women, to be treated as sex objects and pressured to wear short skirts.

I'm saying you're ignorant of US discrimination and harassment laws. That is, you're not knowledgeable of the laws. You continue to demonstrate you don't understand the laws.

I'm a US Citizen. I work in the US. Every job I've ever had since college has required me to go through an orientation process, part of which included the company's anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies. People do get let go and/or otherwise punished for breaking these rules.

Let's take the Weinstein case. If his company didn't have rules against sexual harassment, letting him go over sexual harassment would be wrongful termination, and open the company up to lawsuits.

So, please stop trying to tell people how it is in the US when you are clueless as to how it actually is in the US.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 101

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/3/2017 4:54:12 PM

susie

Posts: 1699
Joined: 11/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: susie
No he was not being a bully. You obviously do not understand the word. I did not accept as you claim. I stood up for myself and answered back. I showed them that women are not weak and afraid. I actually gained their respect.

Making fun of you being flat chested is not the definition of bullying? You have teenage girls begging NHS to sponsor their breast enlargement because of being bullied and tease for having small breasts. It's called body shaming! You can go tell those teenage girls they are weak to succumb and real strong women tell men they got small dicks in response.

Love how you defend Muslims but trivalised real issues.

No wonder you support Islam and their female oppressing cult.

At what point did I talk about Muslims??
Where in my post did I even mention Muslims?

But for your info I have many friends who are Muslim. I also have many Christian friends and a lady who is a Budhist. I actually don't think of them by their religion, they are just my friends.

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 102

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/3/2017 5:59:07 PM

Wayward5oul

Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

Greta finds a way to turn everything into an anti Islamic rant.

(in reply to susie)

Profile

Post #: 103

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/3/2017 6:03:42 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

And has total disregard for facts.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Wayward5oul)

Profile

Post #: 104

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/3/2017 11:25:48 PM

Greta75

Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I'm saying you're ignorant of US discrimination and harassment laws. That is, you're not knowledgeable of the laws. You continue to demonstrate you don't understand the laws.

I'm a US Citizen. I work in the US. Every job I've ever had since college has required me to go through an orientation process, part of which included the company's anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies. People do get let go and/or otherwise punished for breaking these rules.

Let's take the Weinstein case. If his company didn't have rules against sexual harassment, letting him go over sexual harassment would be wrongful termination, and open the company up to lawsuits.

So, please stop trying to tell people how it is in the US when you are clueless as to how it actually is in the US.

So the only real problem here, is that, the women in the media talking about this are also US citizens and have experienced different from your experiences.

So are you saying your experiences is more legitimate than theirs?

And I am glad they are speaking out and bringing awareness, because men like you are trivializing the whole issue by claiming current laws are enough to protect.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 105

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 5:25:34 AM

susie

Posts: 1699
Joined: 11/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I'm saying you're ignorant of US discrimination and harassment laws. That is, you're not knowledgeable of the laws. You continue to demonstrate you don't understand the laws.

I'm a US Citizen. I work in the US. Every job I've ever had since college has required me to go through an orientation process, part of which included the company's anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies. People do get let go and/or otherwise punished for breaking these rules.

Let's take the Weinstein case. If his company didn't have rules against sexual harassment, letting him go over sexual harassment would be wrongful termination, and open the company up to lawsuits.

So, please stop trying to tell people how it is in the US when you are clueless as to how it actually is in the US.

So the only real problem here, is that, the women in the media talking about this are also US citizens and have experienced different from your experiences.

So are you saying your experiences is more legitimate than theirs?

And I am glad they are speaking out and bringing awareness, because men like you are trivializing the whole issue by claiming current laws are enough to protect.

It is not just in the US that have anti-discrimination and anti-harassment polices. Most companies (leaving out micro and self employed) here in the UK also include these in Company Manuals or Orientation processes.
I remember when I was younger David Cassidy came to London. No hotel would have him to stay for fear of his fans being disruptive to other residents. Instead they arranged for him to have a boat moored on the Thames. Even then young girls mostly under 18 were jumping into the river to try to get to the boat. I see that as the girls "throwing themselves" at him. I wonder, now that he is dead, how many women are going to claim he sexually assualted them.
I have worked in the media and have seen the lengths some women will go to in order to get close to an actor or presenter they like or think will help them get on in the media world. It was well known in the 70's that if you got close to certain DJ's you might get invited to meet your favourite group or pop star. It happened and it was different time and a different world back then. To drag things up 20 or 30 years later is beyond ridiculous.

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 106

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 7:31:27 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I'm saying you're ignorant of US discrimination and harassment laws. That is, you're not knowledgeable of the laws. You continue to demonstrate you don't understand the laws.
I'm a US Citizen. I work in the US. Every job I've ever had since college has required me to go through an orientation process, part of which included the company's anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies. People do get let go and/or otherwise punished for breaking these rules.
Let's take the Weinstein case. If his company didn't have rules against sexual harassment, letting him go over sexual harassment would be wrongful termination, and open the company up to lawsuits.
So, please stop trying to tell people how it is in the US when you are clueless as to how it actually is in the US.

So the only real problem here, is that, the women in the media talking about this are also US citizens and have experienced different from your experiences.
So are you saying your experiences is more legitimate than theirs?
And I am glad they are speaking out and bringing awareness, because men like you are trivializing the whole issue by claiming current laws are enough to protect.

I'm not trivializing. You're projecting there.

I never claimed current laws are enough to protect. I do believe they are, though. I'm not in favor of anyone in power being able to wield undue influence, and/or get away with abuse or harassment. Had these women come forward back then, and had people stood up for them, it would have been dealt with years ago.

You think you know about US Anti-discrimination laws and anti-harassment laws, all the while demonstrating you don't.

Weinstein, et. al. wouldn't be in the news if what they did wasn't illegal when they did it. If it was legal, these women would be little more than whiners with no ground to stand on. I would have to wonder if they'd be committing a defamation crime. But, what the accused are alleged to have done was illegal when the allegedly did them. I'm hoping the statute of limitations doesn't prevent appropriate consequences from being applied to those found guilty.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 107

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 8:38:38 AM

Greta75

Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: susie
It is not just in the US that have anti-discrimination and anti-harassment polices. Most companies (leaving out micro and self employed) here in the UK also include these in Company Manuals or Orientation processes.
I remember when I was younger David Cassidy came to London. No hotel would have him to stay for fear of his fans being disruptive to other residents. Instead they arranged for him to have a boat moored on the Thames. Even then young girls mostly under 18 were jumping into the river to try to get to the boat. I see that as the girls "throwing themselves" at him. I wonder, now that he is dead, how many women are going to claim he sexually assualted them.
I have worked in the media and have seen the lengths some women will go to in order to get close to an actor or presenter they like or think will help them get on in the media world. It was well known in the 70's that if you got close to certain DJ's you might get invited to meet your favourite group or pop star. It happened and it was different time and a different world back then. To drag things up 20 or 30 years later is beyond ridiculous.

You are completely out of point now because you are talking about groupies who worship their idols. Women volunteering themselves to make themselves sexually available to a man they lust after. Consensual, in another words. Has nothing to do with this.

We are talking about women in corporations just trying get by day to day to do their jobs, does not deserve any smart remarks at all that sexualise them from their male employers.

I don't think what your boss said to you was appropriate. You don't mind it, but it's wrong. And it's not professional.

Someone needs to read RS guide to when is it appropriate to sexualise women!

(in reply to susie)

Profile

Post #: 108

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 8:43:23 AM

Greta75

Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I'm not trivializing. You're projecting there.

I never claimed current laws are enough to protect. I do believe they are, though.

Ok enough said. I am not projecting. You said it! You believe they are.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 109

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 9:44:40 AM

DaddySatyr

Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

I know I'm going to regret this, but I just have to ask ...

Greta, have you ever lived in this country? I'll even expand the definition to: "spent six months' time here, working (or not), paying rent/mortgage.

Have you ever vacationed, here? We'll define that as spent more than six days in a row.

Have you ever spent a "long weekend" here? We'll call that three or four days.

Seriously, I'm curious and I ask because I'm wondering upon what your knowledge of this country is based.

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 110

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 1:23:28 PM

Wayward5oul

Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

I know I'm going to regret this, but I just have to ask ...

Greta, have you ever lived in this country? I'll even expand the definition to: "spent six months' time here, working (or not), paying rent/mortgage.

Have you ever vacationed, here? We'll define that as spent more than six days in a row.

Have you ever spent a "long weekend" here? We'll call that three or four days.

Seriously, I'm curious and I ask because I'm wondering upon what your knowledge of this country is based.

It's not based on anything grounded in reality

(in reply to DaddySatyr)

Profile

Post #: 111

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 3:37:06 PM

JVoV

Posts: 3676
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline

She watches clips of Fox news online. That counts right?

(in reply to Wayward5oul)

Profile

Post #: 112

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 3:41:23 PM

NoirMetal

Posts: 508
Joined: 3/20/2017
Status: offline

I always thought he was a creeper.

Reminds me of Trevor Goodchild, in a stomach turning way. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/0e/a1/69/0ea1693f503a70202fffe1336d93b23b.jpg

_____________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQeNASx7ksM

(in reply to JVoV)

Profile

Post #: 113

RE: NBC Fires Lauer - 12/4/2017 5:14:28 PM

Greta75

Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
Greta, have you ever lived in this country? I'll even expand the definition to: "spent six months' time here, working (or not), paying rent/mortgage.

Have you ever vacationed, here? We'll define that as spent more than six days in a row.

Have you ever spent a "long weekend" here? We'll call that three or four days.

Seriously, I'm curious and I ask because I'm wondering upon what your knowledge of this country is based.

The longest I have spent vacationing in your country is 6 weeks, although, it was split between california, hawaii and Washington, never been to other states besides these ones. But no I have not lived there for 6 months.
And one of my brothers have lived there for 16 years, married an American woman and is practically spending the rest of his life there.

BTW, you do realise the flight from SG to US is like freaking long, so if anybody bothers to fly there, they are gonna spend way more than 6 days to make the flight time worth it.

And the other thing, America is made up of many tiny different "countries", so even within you Americans cannot agree with each other what America is about.

Take for example, when I said at one point of time, there is a big heroin problem and epidemic of Americans dying of heroin overdose. Quite a few Americans said it was totally bullshit and America does not have a Heroin problem at all. Which is like, serious bullshit when statistics said differently. And some Americans agree and felt it in their area.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)

Profile

Post #: 114