Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

Sensible gun control at last.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Sensible gun control at last. Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 9:12:05 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
The most important gun control measure to be passed is before Congress.
Before anyone's plans for gun control can work NICS has to be fixed.
The fix isn't that difficult they just don't do it.

Since maybe they worked up the nerve to do something let's do this, add 5
(maybe 10 yr ) to the penalty if a gun is used.

Be more aggressive in prosecuting possession crimes.
Virtually every thug arrested can do time for illegal position,
that is 10 years we won't have to worry about them.

Nation wide recognition of ccws just like marriage license
Currently about to pass the house

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 12:08:42 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
I agree. Now all we need to do is elect Judges and DA's that are serious in prosecuting gun crimes. No new laws are needed. Enforce the ones already on the books.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 2
[Awaiting Approval]
wickedsdesires


Posts: 274
Joined: 10/25/2008
Status: offline
[Awaiting Approval]
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 1:15:01 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

I agree. Now all we need to do is elect Judges and DA's that are serious in prosecuting gun crimes. No new laws are needed. Enforce the ones already on the books.

Possession of a firearm by a felon = 10 years. that would depopulate Chicago.
We might have to just put a wall around the city ala NY.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 1:31:04 PM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline
or Alabama, the land of pedophiles.

Yet there are fixes needed to NICS. They have even been discussed and some agreed to by the gun swingers

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 1:54:08 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"pedophilia" was one of mnottertroll's favorite themes. if you are indeed him, some things don't change do they?

if youre not, youre a pretty good disgusting imitation.

which is it?

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 2:03:58 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Possession of a firearm by a felon = 10 years. that would depopulate Chicago.


It might cut down on voter fraud there, too.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 3:17:43 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Possession of a firearm by a felon = 10 years. that would depopulate Chicago.


It might cut down on voter fraud there, too.





If being dead doesn't stop them being in jail won't.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 3:24:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
FR

Was just reading the post article comments on a news site.
I noticed that the lie that both the Texas and CO. shooters
were "good" guys till they started shooting.
In Tx he only got guns because NICS wasn't filled out properly.
He wasn't able to get the guns legally but the sales person didn't
get that info. My first suggestion would have stopped this.
In Co there was a court order to take his guns that wasn't enforced.
The guns that they did collect were illegal and should have had him
incarcerated instead of out shooting people.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 3:32:37 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3226
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
It helps if you post links. Just sayin.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 3:41:51 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3226
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
FR

I'm binge-watching Boston Legal, which has my all time favorite gun quote in one of the episodes.

"Damn liberals want to take all the guns. Nobody could shoot anybody. Then where the hell would we be?" -Denny Crane (Pro-gun and pro-shooting people attorney)

I think the House bill is a waste of time. There aren't 60 votes in the Senate to get it passed.

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 4:21:17 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

The most important gun control measure to be passed is before Congress.
Before anyone's plans for gun control can work NICS has to be fixed.
The fix isn't that difficult they just don't do it.

Since maybe they worked up the nerve to do something let's do this, add 5
(maybe 10 yr ) to the penalty if a gun is used.

Be more aggressive in prosecuting possession crimes.
Virtually every thug arrested can do time for illegal position,
that is 10 years we won't have to worry about them.

Nation wide recognition of ccws just like marriage license
Currently about to pass the house



We can agree here... but are you aware the the Missouri government refuses to give the Federal database information on who is licensed in Missouri to conceal and carry? Why!!! by the way you do know Alaska allows convicted felons to conceal and carry?... do you want those folks carrying guns in your town? Alaska law does not address high-capacity magazines, such as those used by the alleged Arizona shooter. So does that mean LAWS WILL HAVE TO BE CHANGED... or because it is legal in Alaska all states must allow it? Alaska has no waiting period for the purchase of a handgun, rifle or shotgun... just one state...how many different laws are there?... No my friend if your idea is to be implemented then there will have to be new laws along with it to address varying state laws

Butch

ps.... servantforuse got ya

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 4:38:13 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
The GOP’s Latest Gun Bill Would Be Catastrophic For Women Fleeing Abuse
A measure before the House this week would force states to recognize concealed carry permits issued elsewhere.

A potential nightmare situation for victims of domestic violence is brewing in the U.S. House, which is expected to vote this week on a bill that would allow many domestic abusers banned from carrying firearms in their home states to obtain concealed carry permits elsewhere.

The bill, from Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), allows anyone with a permit from one state to carry hidden, loaded firearms into all other states. It would allow people with permits from states with weak permitting rules to carry into states with strict rules, like New York and California. And if a state will issue a concealed carry permit to a nonresident, an applicant could get one and carry the weapon into any other state.

Opponents of the legislation, known as the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, warn that it would allow the states with the loosest permitting standards to define the laws of the nation and would undermine states’ rights to protect their own residents.

The National Rifle Association has called this legislation, which is expected to pass in the House, its “highest legislative priority.” It is likely to be the first gun bill to receive a vote since the back-to-back mass shootings in Las Vegas and Sutherland Springs, Texas.

Gun violence experts and victims’ advocates say the legislation is particularly alarming for domestic violence survivors, who are in more danger when their abusers are able to carry hidden firearms.

Under federal law, a person convicted of domestic violence or subject to certain protective orders is not allowed to own firearms. But the law is limited ― it only covers spouses, not dating partners or stalkers ― and dozens of states have passed their own laws that expand on federal legislation in the interest of keeping guns away from abusers.

Currently, each state sets its own rules about who is eligible to carry concealed weapons. In some states, law enforcement can prohibit a person from carrying a concealed gun at their discretion, such as if they believe the applicant lacks good character or doesn’t have a good reason to carry a loaded gun in public. In other states, officials are essentially required to issue a permit to anyone who meets basic requirements, such as passing a background check or completing safety training.

Some states offer significantly more protections to victims of domestic abuse, dating violence and stalking than others. In 28 states, for example, individuals convicted of stalking are not allowed to carry in public. But, as Everytown for Gun Safety counsel Courtney Zale explained to HuffPost, under concealed carry reciprocity, a stalker in one of those states could obtain a permit from Florida, which does not prohibit stalkers and issues permits to nonresidents through the mail. He could then use that permit to carry throughout the country.

In another example, an abuser who is convicted of sexually assaulting his girlfriend cannot currently legally carry a concealed firearm in Massachusetts. But under this bill, he could obtain a permit from nearby New Hampshire ― which issues permits to nonresidents and does not consider that offense prohibitory ― and carry his firearm back into his home state.

In 25 states and Washington, D.C., law enforcement can deny individuals a concealed carry permit if they have a history of red flags, such as repeated domestic disturbances. Under concealed carry reciprocity, a person could bypass state rules by applying for a permit from a state with less stringent standards.

Ruth Glenn, executive director for the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, said the House measure would effectively “zero out” countless state laws designed to protect victims of abuse. A person who is banned from carrying guns in his home state because of domestic violence could just apply for a permit from another state where he is still eligible because of more permissive laws, she said.

“The efforts that some states have made will be for naught,” Glenn said. “Domestic abusers are very crafty. If we think they don’t know about these laws and ways around them, we are sadly mistaken.”

If a woman in the U.S. is a victim of gun violence, it’s usually because of domestic abuse. More than half of women killed with guns in the U.S. between 2010 and 2014 were killed by intimate partners or family members. The research on this topic is unambiguous: Firearms make abusive relationships more dangerous. If abusers have access to guns, victims are five times more likely to be killed.

Even when they are not being used to kill and maim women, guns are often deployed as a tactic to control and terrorize victims. In addition, most mass shootings in the U.S. involve a male perpetrator targeting a family member or intimate partner.

Kim Gandy, president of the National Network to End Domestic Violence, said that when survivors relocate to escape their abusers, they often take into consideration a state’s firearms protections.

“Imagine fleeing to another state where you believe your abuser won’t be able to carry a gun, and then finding out that Congress says that he can bring his gun with him ― and he can hide it,” she said.

Susan B. Sorenson, a gun violence researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, said the House bill could endanger lives. There’s some evidence to back that up: A recent study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that states with weaker concealed carry laws were associated with 10.6 percent higher handgun homicide rates.

“If this law gets passed, it will be the state with the easiest permit requirements that will define the permitting requirements for every state,” said Adam Winkler, a gun policy expert and law professor at UCLA. “A state that is willing to give permits to people with a history of domestic violence will undermine the laws of many other states that are trying to restrict abusers.”






_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 4:43:40 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3226
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
The House is up for re-election every two years. May as well go as crazy as they can before they're kicked to the curb.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 5:22:14 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

The most important gun control measure to be passed is before Congress.
Before anyone's plans for gun control can work NICS has to be fixed.
The fix isn't that difficult they just don't do it.

Since maybe they worked up the nerve to do something let's do this, add 5
(maybe 10 yr ) to the penalty if a gun is used.

Be more aggressive in prosecuting possession crimes.
Virtually every thug arrested can do time for illegal position,
that is 10 years we won't have to worry about them.

Nation wide recognition of ccws just like marriage license
Currently about to pass the house



We can agree here... but are you aware the the Missouri government refuses to give the Federal database information on who is licensed in Missouri to conceal and carry? Why!!! by the way you do know Alaska allows convicted felons to conceal and carry?... do you want those folks carrying guns in your town? Alaska law does not address high-capacity magazines, such as those used by the alleged Arizona shooter. So does that mean LAWS WILL HAVE TO BE CHANGED... or because it is legal in Alaska all states must allow it? Alaska has no waiting period for the purchase of a handgun, rifle or shotgun... just one state...how many different laws are there?... No my friend if your idea is to be implemented then there will have to be new laws along with it to address varying state laws

Butch

ps.... servantforuse got ya

So you are claiming Alaska ignores Federal Law?
That is a separate issue that will need to be addressed, if true.
Comes under enforce already existing law.
Are you sure that it doesn't come under restoration of rights?
Without something like that it is a felony for a felon to posses a
firearm , 10 years in prison.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 5:24:41 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

The most important gun control measure to be passed is before Congress.
Before anyone's plans for gun control can work NICS has to be fixed.
The fix isn't that difficult they just don't do it.

Since maybe they worked up the nerve to do something let's do this, add 5
(maybe 10 yr ) to the penalty if a gun is used.

Be more aggressive in prosecuting possession crimes.
Virtually every thug arrested can do time for illegal position,
that is 10 years we won't have to worry about them.

Nation wide recognition of ccws just like marriage license
Currently about to pass the house



We can agree here... but are you aware the the Missouri government refuses to give the Federal database information on who is licensed in Missouri to conceal and carry? Why!!! by the way you do know Alaska allows convicted felons to conceal and carry?... do you want those folks carrying guns in your town? Alaska law does not address high-capacity magazines, such as those used by the alleged Arizona shooter. So does that mean LAWS WILL HAVE TO BE CHANGED... or because it is legal in Alaska all states must allow it? Alaska has no waiting period for the purchase of a handgun, rifle or shotgun... just one state...how many different laws are there?... No my friend if your idea is to be implemented then there will have to be new laws along with it to address varying state laws

Butch

ps.... servantforuse got ya

So you are claiming Alaska ignores Federal Law?
That is a separate issue that will need to be addressed, if true.
Comes under enforce already existing law.
Are you sure that it doesn't come under restoration of rights?
Without something like that it is a felony for a felon to posses a
firearm , 10 years in prison.


I agree with most of what you are saying... I just wanted to point out it may not be wise to allow some registered gun owners to possess guns in your state... unless laws were changed not just enforced.

Go ahead and search for Alaska's laws... a felon may own a firearm after 10 years...for instance.... they can have mags with a thousand rounds if they can figure out how to do it... In Alaska they is no waiting for a background check... out the door you go. In Alaska there is no proper registration or permit required to possess a firearm.


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 5:24:52 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

The most important gun control measure to be passed is before Congress.
Before anyone's plans for gun control can work NICS has to be fixed.
The fix isn't that difficult they just don't do it.

Since maybe they worked up the nerve to do something let's do this, add 5
(maybe 10 yr ) to the penalty if a gun is used.

Be more aggressive in prosecuting possession crimes.
Virtually every thug arrested can do time for illegal position,
that is 10 years we won't have to worry about them.

Nation wide recognition of ccws just like marriage license
Currently about to pass the house



We can agree here... but are you aware the the Missouri government refuses to give the Federal database information on who is licensed in Missouri to conceal and carry? Why!!! by the way you do know Alaska allows convicted felons to conceal and carry?... do you want those folks carrying guns in your town? Alaska law does not address high-capacity magazines, such as those used by the alleged Arizona shooter. So does that mean LAWS WILL HAVE TO BE CHANGED... or because it is legal in Alaska all states must allow it? Alaska has no waiting period for the purchase of a handgun, rifle or shotgun... just one state...how many different laws are there?... No my friend if your idea is to be implemented then there will have to be new laws along with it to address varying state laws

Butch

ps.... servantforuse got ya

We don't have an artificial waiting period either, lots of states don't.
What are you leaving out.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 5:27:00 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

The most important gun control measure to be passed is before Congress.
Before anyone's plans for gun control can work NICS has to be fixed.
The fix isn't that difficult they just don't do it.

Since maybe they worked up the nerve to do something let's do this, add 5
(maybe 10 yr ) to the penalty if a gun is used.

Be more aggressive in prosecuting possession crimes.
Virtually every thug arrested can do time for illegal position,
that is 10 years we won't have to worry about them.

Nation wide recognition of ccws just like marriage license
Currently about to pass the house



We can agree here... but are you aware the the Missouri government refuses to give the Federal database information on who is licensed in Missouri to conceal and carry? Why!!! by the way you do know Alaska allows convicted felons to conceal and carry?... do you want those folks carrying guns in your town? Alaska law does not address high-capacity magazines, such as those used by the alleged Arizona shooter. So does that mean LAWS WILL HAVE TO BE CHANGED... or because it is legal in Alaska all states must allow it? Alaska has no waiting period for the purchase of a handgun, rifle or shotgun... just one state...how many different laws are there?... No my friend if your idea is to be implemented then there will have to be new laws along with it to address varying state laws

Butch

ps.... servantforuse got ya

So you are claiming Alaska ignores Federal Law?
That is a separate issue that will need to be addressed, if true.
Comes under enforce already existing law.
Are you sure that it doesn't come under restoration of rights?
Without something like that it is a felony for a felon to posses a
firearm , 10 years in prison.


I agree with most of what you are saying... I just wanted to point out it may not be wise to allow some registered gun owners to possess guns in your state... unless laws were changed not just enforced.

As I pointed out unless your information is flawed there are already law that cover this.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 5:31:33 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD



As I pointed out unless your information is flawed there are already law that cover this.



Whos law? that is Alaska LAW... states rights ya know

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Sensible gun control at last. - 12/6/2017 5:35:24 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I'm not saying there cannot be a law that requires states to honor all others states gun laws... but it would not be sensible law as you say... at least that part of what you are proposing. The rest is just fine

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Sensible gun control at last. Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

7.338