MrRodgers -> RE: Goddess ScaryMary and her Church (12/14/2017 6:34:38 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote:
ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Big, profitable and Tax Free I think that was what the temple of Set split from Lavey's bunch over, wasn't it? Lavey, whatever else you could say against him, was very opposed to tax free status for religions, while Aquino didn't think that there was any point being part of a church that paid taxes. Yes, Aquino seems to have been real capitalist. They both were, to be fair, it was just that LaVey was obsessed that the Pope and Pat Robertson should be paying tax as part of his general anti-christian bias. I always find the spectacle of somebody so hugely libertarian in everything else he said insisting that religions (or anybody else, for that matter) should be paying taxes very funny indeed. I am not in total disagreement, there are many transactions that deserve no tax code subsidy. Why should the childless subsidize the child bearing ? Why should labor taxes subsidize investment capital ? Why should cults based on religious beliefs...be tax free and their revenue tax deductible ? Most are emotional or greed and hardly pragmatic. Some counties (at least a few) have lower rates than the US and allows no deductions at all.
|
|
|
|