|
jlf1961 -> And they wonder why they lost to Trump? (12/13/2017 5:49:19 AM)
|
quote:
Nancy Pelosi Lies To Twitter About National Reciprocity
Nancy Pelosi isn’t exactly a freshman congresswoman. She’s been in office for a long, long time, from well before the days of Twitter and Facebook. However, she’s also someone who plays almost exclusively to her base.
A prime example of this is a tweet she put out following the House’s vote on HR 38, the bill that would grant national reciprocity for concealed carry holders.
source
I didnt much like her when she was speaker of the house, and considering the Dems seem hell bent on regulating everything possible (one New York Dem introduced a bill to make it mandatory for auto industry to put motion detectors in the back seat of cars to prevent parents from leaving kids in the car) but this moron has really taken the cake with a flat out lie.
To be honest, considering the fact that these people cant even stick to the Department of Justice statistics on gun crime and inflate numbers by counting accidents and suicides to make a point, not to mention that the Dems wrote the back ground check law that was flawed from the beginning, they have to pull this crap.
At one time the Democrat party actually had some ethical standards (as did the GOP) but they are quickly losing credibility in everything they once stood for.
Face reality, the picked a woman to run for President that did not even have enough self value to tell a cheating bastard who was getting blow jobs in the oval office to hit the bricks.
Then to turn and condemn Trump for the stuff he said on that Access Hollywood tape? Jesus, she couldnt even tell her husband he was a fucking asshole for his repeated cheating on her.
Then we get dems like Pelosi, who cant even admit that 1) she is part of the party that fucked up in the first place on back ground checks, and 2) Clearly has no clue about the regulations that HER party helped pass in the original and subsequent National Firearms Acts.
Of course, there is the nice little habit of Democrat party to throw people under the bus when states redraw districts and do it right, and suddenly the Democrat party decides not to spend money in a race 'that is already lost.'
Look at what they did to Charles Stenholm, a dem from my state. The congressional district was redrawn to reflect changes in population, and because Stenholm actually listened to people, he did not always vote the party line. So when there was a race in the new district, they cut his campaign funds right after he won the primary and lost the district.
A district that even after being redrawn should have been a shoe in victory for the Dems, with 60% of the registered voters being democrats.
With a party like this, we can pretty much count on a fucked up, deadlocked congress for the next decade, unless they actually start thinking about telling the truth, using actual facts, and stop with the hypocrisy.
|
|
|
|
