I thought this was rather amusing (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


MasterJaguar01 -> I thought this was rather amusing (12/17/2017 7:38:35 AM)

I was doing a bit of research on what can constitute "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" as referenced in Article II of the Constitution.

Of course a Wiki page comes up in every Google search :)

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.

I just happened to notice the phrase: "unbecoming conduct".

Just ponder that for a moment with our current administration. I almost snarfed hot coffee.




BoscoX -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/17/2017 7:53:07 AM)

[image]http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01523/obama_1523079c.jpg[/image]

[image]http://www.isthatbaloney.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/obama-bows-saudi-king.jpg[/image]

[image]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/7d/b9/48/7db9486cb6bde864d3a370be76515c25.jpg[/image]




BoscoX -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/17/2017 8:25:27 AM)

[image]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/be/9e/07/be9e07d54122afe4f19b84ed0e0fdae6.jpg[/image]




CaptR -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/17/2017 12:32:18 PM)

I thought "unbecoming behavior" was a modern requirement for the job of politico on any level. Silly me.




JVoV -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/17/2017 4:22:58 PM)

Let's impeach Obama! And Hillary!




BamaD -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/17/2017 9:29:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

I was doing a bit of research on what can constitute "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" as referenced in Article II of the Constitution.

Of course a Wiki page comes up in every Google search :)

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.

I just happened to notice the phrase: "unbecoming conduct".

Just ponder that for a moment with our current administration. I almost snarfed hot coffee.

So perjury would make the cut?




MrRodgers -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/17/2017 10:33:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

Let's impeach Obama! And Hillary!

I've heard that.




MrRodgers -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/17/2017 10:37:29 PM)

You'd be surprised I think, if you read the history of impeachment even if a few articles were on some pretty egregious behavior. Should do an OP on it.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/18/2017 4:53:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

I was doing a bit of research on what can constitute "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" as referenced in Article II of the Constitution.

Of course a Wiki page comes up in every Google search :)

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.

I just happened to notice the phrase: "unbecoming conduct".

Just ponder that for a moment with our current administration. I almost snarfed hot coffee.

So perjury would make the cut?


I would think so. Impeachment covers ALL Civil Officers.

I am not sure if that covers the AG. He is a poster child for perjury.
Pence lied on TV a dozen times. (I wish he were under oath)
Reince Priebus lied on TV.
Ohh... Sean Spicer!


ok... The last two are not civil officers.




WhoreMods -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/18/2017 6:08:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

I was doing a bit of research on what can constitute "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" as referenced in Article II of the Constitution.

Of course a Wiki page comes up in every Google search :)

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.

I just happened to notice the phrase: "unbecoming conduct".

Just ponder that for a moment with our current administration. I almost snarfed hot coffee.

How are they defining unbecoming conduct?




BamaD -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/18/2017 3:30:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

I was doing a bit of research on what can constitute "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" as referenced in Article II of the Constitution.

Of course a Wiki page comes up in every Google search :)

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.

I just happened to notice the phrase: "unbecoming conduct".

Just ponder that for a moment with our current administration. I almost snarfed hot coffee.

So perjury would make the cut?


I would think so. Impeachment covers ALL Civil Officers.

I am not sure if that covers the AG. He is a poster child for perjury.
Pence lied on TV a dozen times. (I wish he were under oath)
Reince Priebus lied on TV.
Ohh... Sean Spicer!


ok... The last two are not civil officers.

Clinton was under Oath.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: I thought this was rather amusing (12/18/2017 7:19:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

I was doing a bit of research on what can constitute "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" as referenced in Article II of the Constitution.

Of course a Wiki page comes up in every Google search :)

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.

I just happened to notice the phrase: "unbecoming conduct".

Just ponder that for a moment with our current administration. I almost snarfed hot coffee.

So perjury would make the cut?


I would think so. Impeachment covers ALL Civil Officers.

I am not sure if that covers the AG. He is a poster child for perjury.
Pence lied on TV a dozen times. (I wish he were under oath)
Reince Priebus lied on TV.
Ohh... Sean Spicer!


ok... The last two are not civil officers.

Clinton was under Oath.


So was Sessions




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1054688